Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 125

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

liability of cities, villages, towns, and counties for damages caused by an insufficiency or want of repair of a highway.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, cities, villages, towns, and counties are immune from claims

arising out of the performance of a discretionary duty, or duty that requires a

governmental entity to use judgment or discretion in carrying out the duty. Cities,

villages, towns, and counties are liable for damages of up to $50,000 arising out of

the performance of a nondiscretionary duty.

Also under current law, cities, villages, towns, and counties are liable for

damages of up to $50,000 to a person or property resulting from an insufficiency or

want of repair of a highway, which includes shoulders, sidewalks, and bridges.

Cities, villages, towns, and counties are also liable for damages resulting from the

accumulation of snow or ice that has existed on a highway for at least three weeks.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court in

Morris v. Juneau County

, 219 Wis. 2d 544

(1998), held that the statutory provision imposing liability on cities, villages, towns,

and counties for highway defects is an exception to the more general provision

granting immunity to cities, villages, towns, and counties from liability arising out

of the performance of discretionary duties.

Finally, under current law, if the negligence or deliberate wrongdoing of a

person contributes to the creation of a highway defect that results in damages to a

person or property, the negligent or wrongdoing person is primarily liable and the

city, village, town, or county is secondarily liable only if the negligent person or the

person who committed the wrongdoing does not satisfy the judgment, and the city,

village, town, or county is otherwise liable for the damages.

This bill eliminates the specific immunity exception under which cities,

villages, towns, and counties may be held liable for an insufficiency or want of repairs

of a highway. This bill does not affect the immunity exception under which cities,

villages, towns, and counties may be held liable for damages of up to $50,000 for the

accumulation of snow or ice that has existed on a highway for at least three weeks.

The bill also eliminates secondary liability for cities, villages, towns, and counties.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Galloway (R) , Grothman (R) , Lasee (R) , Lazich (R)

11 cosponsors

Bernier (R) , Brooks (R) , Jacque (R) , Kaufert (R) , Knudson (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Litjens (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Strachota (R) , Vos (R) , Weininger (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Nov 1, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 36

Passed 60–36 Jan 26, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 10, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Grothman, Galloway, Lasee and Lazich;Cosponsored by Representatives Jacque, Brooks, Bernier, Kaufert, Knudson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Spanbauer, Strachota, Vos and Weininger

  2. Jun 10, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Jun 29, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jul 7, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 4, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Nov 1, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Nov 1, 2011 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  8. Nov 1, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Nov 1, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-2-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  12. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 21, Noes 11

  13. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Nov 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  16. Dec 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  17. Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-26-2012 by committee on Rules

  18. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  19. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Mason, Vruwink, Pasch, C. Taylor, Ringhand, Zamarripa, Doyle, Hulsey, Bernard Schaber, Danou, Sinicki, Zepnick, Kessler, Hebl, Pope-Roberts, Clark, Seidel, Roys, Barca, Molepske Jr, E. Coggs, Hintz, Bewley, Pocan, Billings, Richards and Jorgensen

  21. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 36

  22. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Jan 27, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-13-2012

  28. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012

  29. Mar 22, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 132

  30. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-4-2012