Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 127

Aggravating factors for a court to consider when sentencing persons

Topics: Children: Abuse and neglect, Court: Procedure, Sentences and penalties, Women

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 10, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 10, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Oct 25, 2011

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 13, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 273

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 12, 2012: “Published 4-23-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law requires courts to consider specific factors when sentencing people convicted of certain crimes. For instance, if a person is convicted of first or second degree sexual assault of a child and the person was the child's parent, guardian, or temporary caregiver or another person legally responsible for the child's welfare, the sentencing court must consider as an aggravating factor that the convicted person was responsible for the welfare of the child. Under this bill, if a person is convicted of a crime involving an act of domestic abuse and the crime was committed in the presence of a child, the sentencing court must consider as an aggravating factor that the convicted person committed the crime in the presence of a child.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. All 3 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 19, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 22, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 12, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 10, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 273.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 22, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 22, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  7. Jan 13, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Dec 15, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Nov 18, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  10. Oct 28, 2011

    The Assembly received it.

  11. Oct 25, 2011

    The Senate passed it.

  12. Oct 19, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  13. Oct 4, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jul 5, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Jun 30, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Jun 28, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Jun 10, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  18. Jun 10, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 10, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Kapanke and Darling;Cosponsored by Representatives Bernier, Kaufert, A. Ott, E. Coggs, Spanbauer, Krug and Mursau

  2. Jun 10, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Jun 28, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 30, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jul 5, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Oct 4, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Oct 24, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-25-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Oct 28, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Nov 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  18. Dec 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  19. Jan 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  20. Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  21. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  22. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  23. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  24. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:49 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  25. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  26. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  28. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  29. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  31. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-23-2012

  32. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  33. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-9-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 273

  34. Apr 12, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-23-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote