Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
authorizing towns to challenge certain city or village annexation procedures.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Currently, town territory that is contiguous to any city or village may be
annexed to that city or village under several methods if, in general, some of the city's
or village's territory is in the same county as the territory to be annexed, unless both
the town and county boards approve of the proposed annexation, and the city or
village agrees to make limited payments to the town based on property taxes that the
town levied on the annexed territory.
One of the methods of annexation is direct annexation by unanimous approval.
If a petition for direct annexation by unanimous approval signed by all of the electors
residing in the territory and the owners of all of the real property in the territory is
filed with the city or village clerk and the town clerk of all of the involved towns, along
with a scale map and legal description of the property to be annexed, the governing
body of the city or village may, generally, annex the property by a two-thirds vote of
the body. Such an annexation, however, is subject to Department of Administration
advisory review as if the annexation petition were for direct, but not unanimous,
annexation or annexation by referendum. In addition, such an annexation is limited
under current law to town land that is contiguous to the annexing city or village.
Under current law, a town may not challenge in court, on any grounds, any
direct annexation by unanimous approval as well as several other types of
annexations. This bill changes current law by repealing the provision that prohibits
a town from challenging in court direct annexation by unanimous approval.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Feb 17, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 15, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lasee, Kedzie, Moulton and Holperin;Cosponsored by Representatives A. Ott, Bernier, Bies, Brooks, Craig, Kerkman, Kestell, LeMahieu, Murtha, Pridemore, Spanbauer, Tauchen and Vruwink
- Jun 15, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs
- Jun 29, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 30, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 9, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Lasee
- Feb 7, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 16, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1