Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 15

Collection and analysis of motor vehicle traffic stop information and law enforcement training standards

Topics: Administration, Department of: Agency and general functions, Data processing, Discrimination, Justice Assistance, Office of, Legislature: Finance, Joint Committee on, Minority groups, Motor vehicle: Regulation, Police, Reports

Became law

The governor signed it on Jun 23, 2011. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 2, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 19 to 0

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 61 to 36

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 29

Latest entry in the official record, Jun 24, 2011: “Published 6-29-2011”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, as created in 2009 Wisconsin Act 28 (the biennial budget act), law enforcement officers must collect, at each motor vehicle traffic stop made after December 31, 2010, all information specified by rule promulgated by the Office of Justice Assistance (OJA) in the Department of Administration (DOA). This information must then be submitted by the law enforcement agency to OJA. OJA must analyze this information to determine whether the number of motor vehicle stops and searches involving racial minorities is disproportionate compared to nonminorities. OJA was required to submit its proposed rules to the Legislative Council staff by February 1, 2010. The biennial budget act also required DOA to submit a report to the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) that includes certain information related to the development of a traffic stop information collection system. System development cannot begin until JCF approves the report.

This bill repeals the statutory provisions of the biennial budget act relating to the collection and analysis of traffic stop information and requires that, if the development of a traffic stop information system has already commenced, this system development must terminate on the effective date of the bill.

Read the full summary

Current law, as created in the biennial budget act, also requires law enforcement training programs to provide training designed to prevent racial profiling or race-based discrimination as a basis for detaining, searching, or arresting a person. The bill also repeals this training requirement.

Who's behind it

7 senators are its ⁠. 6 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

22 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 29 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (22)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Feb 22, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 19 to 0 · Feb 23, 2011 · 14 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 19, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 58 to 36 · May 17, 2011 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (58)

No (36)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 58, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 36 · May 17, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 61 to 36 · Jun 8, 2011 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (61)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Jun 24, 2011

    The new law was published.

  2. Jun 23, 2011

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 29.

  3. Jun 22, 2011

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jun 8, 2011

    The Assembly passed it too, 61 to 36.

  5. Mar 1, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 1, 2011

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 23, 2011

    The Senate passed it, 19 to 0.

  8. Feb 23, 2011

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  9. Feb 22, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  10. Feb 16, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Feb 14, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Feb 3, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs,.

  13. Feb 3, 2011

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  14. Feb 2, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.

  15. Feb 2, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 2, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lazich, Wanggaard, Grothman, Schultz, Leibham, Jauch and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Bernier, Jacque, Mursau, Thiesfeldt, Nass, Farrow, Brooks, LeMahieu, Vos, Ziegelbauer, Petersen, Kerkman, Ripp, Kooyenga, Bies, Strachota, Kleefisch, Kestell and Marklein

  2. Feb 2, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  3. Feb 3, 2011 · Senate

    Representative Spanbauer added as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 3, 2011 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Transportation and Elections and rereferred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, pursuant to Senate Rule 46 (2)(c)

  5. Feb 14, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 14, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Feb 14, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Feb 16, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  9. Feb 22, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Feb 22, 2011 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  11. Feb 22, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Feb 22, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-23-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Feb 23, 2011 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor

  14. Feb 23, 2011 · Senate

    Senator Cowles added as a coauthor

  15. Feb 23, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  16. Feb 23, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Feb 23, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  18. Feb 23, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 19, Noes 0

  19. Feb 23, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Mar 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  21. Mar 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  22. May 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2011 by committee on Rules

  23. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  24. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  25. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Clark and Barca

  26. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36

  27. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. May 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 58, Noes 36

  29. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  30. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Jun 9, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  32. Jun 17, 2011 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 6-17-2011

  33. Jun 22, 2011 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 6-22-2011

  34. Jun 23, 2011 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 6-22-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 29

  35. Jun 24, 2011 · Senate

    Published 6-29-2011

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote