Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 157

Preparation of legislative and congressional districting plans by the Legislative Reference Bureau and the Government Accountability Board

Topics: Bills, Legislative, Government Accountability Board, Legislative Reference Bureau, Redistricting

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jul 29, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

The Wisconsin Constitution requires the legislature to redistrict legislative districts according to the number of inhabitants at its next session following each decennial federal census. The legislature also reapportions congressional districts pursuant to federal law.

This bill creates a new procedure for the preparation of legislative and congressional redistricting plans. The bill requires the Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB) and the Government Accountability Board (GAB) to jointly develop standards for legislative and congressional districts based on population requirements under the Wisconsin Constitution and the U.S. Constitution and requirements under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. One of the standards must be electoral competitiveness of the districts. The bill then directs the LRB and the GAB to draw redistricting plans for submission to the legislature for approval in accordance with the standards. Under the bill, no later than January 1 of the second year following the decennial federal census, the LRB and the GAB must deliver to the majority leader of the senate and speaker of the assembly identical bills embodying a plan of legislative and congressional districting.

Read the full summary

The bill requires either the assembly or the senate to expeditiously introduce and bring a bill to a vote not less than seven days after the date of introduction. The vote must be under a procedure or rule permitting no amendments, except those of a purely corrective nature. If a bill is approved by the first house in which it is considered, the bill must expeditiously be brought to a vote in the second house under a similar procedure or rule.

If neither of the bills delivered by the LRB and the GAB is approved by the assembly and the senate, the LRB and the GAB must then prepare identical bills embodying a second plan of legislative and congressional redistricting. The LRB and the GAB must deliver the bill to the majority leader of the senate and the speaker of the assembly no later than 21 days after the date of the vote by which the senate or assembly failed to approve the first bill. This second bill must be expeditiously introduced and brought to a vote not less than seven days after the date of introduction, in the same manner as prescribed for the initial bill.

If the second bill is not approved by the assembly and the senate, the same procedure applies for the preparation of a third plan by the LRB and the GAB and legislative consideration of a third plan. The bill does not provide any procedure for the preparation and submission of a fourth plan by the LRB and the GAB. It is important to note that the procedure established under the bill for legislative consideration of any legislative or congressional districting plan is a rule of proceeding under the Wisconsin Constitution and, as such, would not be legally enforceable in a court of law if the assembly or senate failed to follow the procedure.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. All 4 are Democrats.

13 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (13)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 21, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Aug 17, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Jul 29, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  5. Jul 29, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jul 29, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Risser, S. Coggs, Wirch and T. Cullen;Cosponsored by Representatives Hulsey, Sinicki, Young, Roys, Ringhand, Bernard Schaber, Pocan, Clark, Fields, Berceau, Hintz, Pope-Roberts and Barca

  2. Jul 29, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Aug 17, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 21, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate