Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
the disclosure of electronic juvenile court records to law enforcement agencies and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the director of state courts has established an automated
information system, known as the Consolidated Court Automation Programs
(CCAP), that contains information about cases filed in the circuit courts in this state,
including cases filed in the courts assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the
Juvenile Justice Code (juvenile courts). Records of the juvenile court, however, are
confidential and may not be opened to inspection, nor may their contents be
disclosed, except under certain statutory exceptions or by an order of the juvenile
court. Currently, those exceptions include an exception that requires a juvenile court
to disclose its records on the request of a law enforcement agency to review those
records for the purpose of investigating alleged criminal gang activity.
This bill permits the juvenile court to transfer to a law enforcement agency the
electronic records of the juvenile court, permits the director of state courts to use
CCAP to facilitate that transfer of those electronic records, and requires the director
of state courts to determine what types of information from those electronic records
may be transferred to a law enforcement agency. In addition, the bill requires a law
enforcement agency to keep any information from those records transferred to the
agency confidential and permits a law enforcement agency to use or allow access to
that information only for the purpose of investigating alleged criminal or delinquent
activity. Also, the bill requires an individual who is allowed access to any information
from those electronic records to keep the information confidential and to use and
further disclose the information only for the purpose of investigating alleged
criminal or delinquent activity. Finally, the bill provides for a forfeiture of not more
than $5,000 for any person who intentionally discloses information in violation of the
bill.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 17, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Aug 30, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Darling, Lazich, Olsen and Wanggaard;Cosponsored by Representatives Vos, Bernier, Brooks, Jacque, Kaufert, Kestell, Knodl, Petersen, Strachota, Stroebel and Ziegelbauer
- Aug 30, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations
- Sep 15, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 19, 2011 · Senate
Representative Ballweg added as a cosponsor
- Jan 19, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Darling
- Jan 31, 2012 · Senate
Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor
- Feb 1, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Darling
- Feb 16, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 16, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Representative Richards added as a cosponsor
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:51 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 16, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 19, 2012 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 21, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-21-2012
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012
- Apr 10, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-9-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 270
- Apr 12, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-23-2012