Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 173

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

the disclosure of electronic juvenile court records to law enforcement agencies and providing a penalty.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the director of state courts has established an automated

information system, known as the Consolidated Court Automation Programs

(CCAP), that contains information about cases filed in the circuit courts in this state,

including cases filed in the courts assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the

Juvenile Justice Code (juvenile courts). Records of the juvenile court, however, are

confidential and may not be opened to inspection, nor may their contents be

disclosed, except under certain statutory exceptions or by an order of the juvenile

court. Currently, those exceptions include an exception that requires a juvenile court

to disclose its records on the request of a law enforcement agency to review those

records for the purpose of investigating alleged criminal gang activity.

This bill permits the juvenile court to transfer to a law enforcement agency the

electronic records of the juvenile court, permits the director of state courts to use

CCAP to facilitate that transfer of those electronic records, and requires the director

of state courts to determine what types of information from those electronic records

may be transferred to a law enforcement agency. In addition, the bill requires a law

enforcement agency to keep any information from those records transferred to the

agency confidential and permits a law enforcement agency to use or allow access to

that information only for the purpose of investigating alleged criminal or delinquent

activity. Also, the bill requires an individual who is allowed access to any information

from those electronic records to keep the information confidential and to use and

further disclose the information only for the purpose of investigating alleged

criminal or delinquent activity. Finally, the bill provides for a forfeiture of not more

than $5,000 for any person who intentionally discloses information in violation of the

bill.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Darling (R) , Lazich (R) , Olsen (R) , Wanggaard (R)

14 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , Brooks (R) , Carpenter (D) , Jacque (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kestell (R) , Knodl (R) , Petersen (R) , Richards (D) , Strachota (R) , Stroebel (R) , Vos (R) , Ziegelbauer (I)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 17, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Aug 30, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Darling, Lazich, Olsen and Wanggaard;Cosponsored by Representatives Vos, Bernier, Brooks, Jacque, Kaufert, Kestell, Knodl, Petersen, Strachota, Stroebel and Ziegelbauer

  2. Aug 30, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Sep 15, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 19, 2011 · Senate

    Representative Ballweg added as a cosponsor

  5. Jan 19, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Darling

  6. Jan 31, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor

  7. Feb 1, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  8. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Darling

  9. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  11. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  14. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 2 adopted

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  19. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  22. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  23. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  24. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Representative Richards added as a cosponsor

  25. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  26. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:51 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  27. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  28. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  30. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  31. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  33. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    LRB correction

  34. Mar 21, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-21-2012

  35. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  36. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-9-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 270

  37. Apr 12, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-23-2012