Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 177

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

jurisdiction in matters relating to domestic abuse restraining orders and injunctions, child abuse restraining orders and injunctions, and harassment restraining orders and injunctions.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a court may entertain a civil action only when the court has

jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action and over the persons who are served

in the action. Jurisdiction is conferred by the U.S. Constitution, the Wisconsin

Constitution, and by statute.

This bill clarifies when a court has subject matter and personal jurisdiction in

certain actions for restraining orders or injunctions in cases of domestic abuse, child

abuse, or harassment. Under the bill, a court has jurisdiction of the subject matter

to entertain those actions regardless of whether the alleged abuse or harassment

occurred within the state. Under the bill, a court has personal jurisdiction over a

person who is in another state if any of the following applies:

1. The abuse or harassment has an effect in Wisconsin.

2. A petition for a restraining order or injunction has been filed in Wisconsin

and the person does not appear, respond, or file a response or motion asserting lack

of jurisdiction as a defense.

3. If the petitioner or the person resides in Wisconsin or the petitioner is

temporarily living in Wisconsin and the abuse or harassment has an effect in

Wisconsin.

4. Jurisdiction is otherwise permitted under the U.S. Constitution or the

Wisconsin Constitution.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Harsdorf (R) , Kedzie (R) , Wanggaard (R)

22 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Brooks (R) , Danou (D) , Jacque (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Krug (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Milroy (D) , Nass (R) , Nygren (R) , Petrowski (R) , Pocan (D) , Roys (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Steineke (R) , Strachota (R) , T. Larson (R) , Van Roy (R) , Wynn (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1

Passed 4–1 Jan 17, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Sep 7, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Wanggaard, Kedzie, Carpenter and Harsdorf;Cosponsored by Representatives Loudenbeck, Roys, Steineke, Nass, Petrowski, A. Ott, Pocan, Danou, Wynn, Brooks, Milroy, Strachota, Nygren, Kerkman, Jacque, Spanbauer, Krug, T. Larson, Kaufert, Ballweg, Van Roy and Kleefisch

  2. Sep 7, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs

  3. Sep 29, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 29, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard

  6. Jan 10, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  8. Jan 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  9. Jan 17, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1