Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 202

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

elimination of compensatory and punitive damages for acts of employment discrimination or unfair honesty or genetic testing.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current fair employment law, a person alleging discrimination in

employment or unfair honesty or genetic testing may file a complaint with the

Department of Workforce Development (DWD) seeking action that will effectuate

the purpose of the fair employment law, including reinstating the employee,

providing back pay, and paying costs and attorney fees. In addition, the fair

employment law permits DWD or a person who has been discriminated against or

subjected to unfair honesty or genetic testing to bring an action in circuit court to

recover compensatory and punitive damages caused by the act of discrimination or

unfair honesty or genetic testing after the completion of all administrative

proceedings before DWD and the Labor and Industry Review Commission

concerning the violation. If the circuit court finds that a defendant has committed

an act of discrimination or unfair honesty or genetic testing, the circuit court must

order the defendant to pay to the person discriminated against compensatory and

punitive damages in an amount that the circuit court finds appropriate, subject to

certain limitations, as follows:

1. If the defendant employs 100 or fewer employees, $50,000.

2. If the defendant employs more than 100 but fewer than 201 employees,

$100,000.

3. If the defendant employs more than 200 but fewer than 501 employees,

$200,000.

4. If the defendant employs more than 500 employees, $300,000.

This bill eliminates the awarding of compensatory and punitive damages to

persons who have been discriminated against in employment or subjected to unfair

honesty or genetic testing. Under the bill, DWD may still award to such a person

back pay, costs, and attorney fees.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Darling (R) , Galloway (R) , Grothman (R) , Kedzie (R) , Lasee (R) , Moulton (R) , Zipperer (R)

26 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Craig (R) , Endsley (R) , Honadel (R) , Kapenga (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Knilans (R) , Knodl (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Litjens (R) , Petersen (R) , Pridemore (R) , Rivard (R) , Severson (R) , Steineke (R) , Strachota (R) , Stroebel (R) , T. Larson (R) , Tauchen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Vos (R)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Oct 26, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15

Passed 17–15 Nov 2, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Refused to suspend the rules, Ayes 55, Noes 37

Passed 55–37 Nov 3, 2011 official source full page

Aye · 55

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 58, Noes 37

Passed 58–37 Feb 16, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 58

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 60, Noes 35

Passed 60–35 Feb 21, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 60

Full history

  1. Sep 27, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Grothman, Galloway, Darling, Lasee, Kedzie, Zipperer and Moulton;Cosponsored by Representatives Litjens, LeMahieu, Pridemore, Thiesfeldt, Honadel, Brooks, Knodl, Kleefisch, T. Larson, Kooyenga, Rivard, Kapenga, Steineke, Severson, Petersen, Stroebel, Vos, Knilans, Craig, A. Ott, Kaufert, Tauchen, Bies, Kuglitsch, Endsley and Strachota

  2. Sep 27, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Oct 12, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Nov 1, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-2-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15

  10. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Taylor, Hansen, Miller, S. Coggs, C. Larson, Holperin and Carpenter

  13. Nov 3, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time

  14. Nov 3, 2011 · Senate

    Passed, Ayes 17, Noes 16

  15. Nov 3, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Read

  18. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend the rules, Ayes 55, Noes 37

  19. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2012 by committee on Rules

  21. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 58, Noes 37

  24. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 60, Noes 35

  25. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-1-2012

  28. Mar 29, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-29-2012

  29. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-5-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 219

  30. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012