Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
permitting an employer to refuse to employ or to bar or terminate from employment an individual who has been convicted of a felony and who has not been pardoned for that felony and preempting cities, villages, towns, and counties from adopting provisions concerning employment discrimination based on arrest or conviction record that prohibit activity that is allowed under the state fair employment law.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
The current state fair employment law, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits
discrimination in employment based on arrest or conviction record. That law
specifies, however, that it is not employment discrimination because of conviction
record to refuse to employ or to terminate from employment an individual who has
been convicted of a felony, misdemeanor, or other offense, the circumstances of which
substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job. This bill specifies that
it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record for an employer to
refuse to employ or to bar or terminate from employment an individual who has been
convicted of a felony and who has not been pardoned for that felony, whether or not
the circumstances of the felony substantially relate to the circumstances of the
particular job.
Under current constitutional and statutory home rule provisions, a city or
village may determine its own local affairs subject only to the Wisconsin Constitution
and to any enactment of the legislature that is of statewide concern and that affects
every city or village with uniformity. This bill states that the prohibition against
discrimination in employment based on arrest or conviction record under the state
fair employment law is a matter of statewide concern, requiring uniform
enforcement at the state, county, and municipal levels. As such, the bill prohibits any
county, city, village, or town from adopting any provision concerning employment
discrimination based on arrest or conviction record that prohibits any activity that
is allowed under the state fair employment law.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs
Passed 5–0 Nov 2, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 28, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Darling, Lazich, Zipperer, Moulton and Galloway;Cosponsored by Representatives Kleefisch, LeMahieu, Jacque, Craig, Knodl, Pridemore, Ziegelbauer, Thiesfeldt, Nass, Endsley, Petersen, Kuglitsch, Litjens, T. Larson and Stroebel
- Sep 28, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs
- Oct 12, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 24, 2011 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Nov 1, 2011 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1