Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 224

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

exception to local levy limits for the village of Shorewood.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Generally under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,

village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not increase its levy by a

percentage that exceeds its "valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of

either zero percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized

value due to new construction, less improvements removed. The base amount of a

political subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the actual levy for

the immediately preceding year.

Because of an error by the village of Shorewood assessor in reporting the

valuation of Tax Incremental District (TID) Number 1 in the village, should the

village impose its intended 2011 levy, the resulting tax rate would lead to the

collection of higher than intended revenues for TID Number 1. If the village reduces

its levy and resulting tax rate, however, the levy will be less than initially intended

and the levy limit for 2012 would be based at the reduced levy for 2011. Under this

bill, the levy limits applicable to the village of Shorewood are increased by: 1) for

2012, the amount by which the village reduces its levy from the amount it would have

levied in 2011 if not for an error in the valuation of the village's TID Number 1 to

compensate for that error, and 2) for 2012 and 2013, a combined amount equal to the

amount of funds applied from the village's general fund in 2011 to replace funds that

would have been levied if not for the error in valuation. The actual levy limit increase

amounts are determined by the Department of Revenue.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Darling (R)

3 cosponsors

Kerkman (R) , Pasch and E. Coggs , Taylor (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 26, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 93, Noes 0, Paired 2

Passed 93–0 Nov 3, 2011 official source full page

Aye · 93

Not voting · 3

Full history

  1. Oct 6, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Darling;Cosponsored by Representative Kerkman

  2. Oct 6, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue

  3. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Senator Taylor added as a coauthor

  4. Oct 20, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 20, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-27-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  7. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 31, Noes 0

  16. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-1-2011 by committee on Rules

  20. Nov 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:10 A.M. on 11-03-2011 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 18

  21. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Representatives Pasch and E. Coggs added as cosponsors

  23. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 93, Noes 0, Paired 2

  26. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Nov 4, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  28. Nov 8, 2011 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-8-2011

  29. Nov 8, 2011 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-8-2011

  30. Nov 11, 2011 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-9-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 63

  31. Nov 11, 2011 · Senate

    Published 11-23-2011