Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 230

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

an exemption from the prevailing wage law for a public works project that is not less than 85 percent privately funded in which the completed facility is dedicated to the state or a local governmental unit for conservation, recreational, or educational purposes.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, laborers, workers, mechanics, and truck drivers employed

on the site of certain state or local projects of public works (generally single-trade

projects whose estimated cost of completion is $48,000 or more and multiple-trade

projects whose estimated cost of completion is $100,000 or more): 1) must be paid at

the rate paid for a majority of the hours worked in the person's trade or occupation

in the county in which the project is located, as determined by the Department of

Workforce Development; and 2) may not be required or permitted to work a greater

number of hours per day and per week than the prevailing hours of labor, that is, no

more than 10 hours per day and 40 hours per week, unless they are paid 1.5 times

their basic rate of pay (commonly referred to as "overtime pay") for all hours worked

in excess of the prevailing hours of labor (prevailing wage law).

This bill exempts from the prevailing wage law a project of public works in

which not less than 85 percent of the estimated cost of project completion is privately

funded, the completed facility is dedicated to the state or a local governmental unit

without compensation for ownership by the state or local governmental unit, and the

completed facility is used for conservation, recreational, or educational purposes.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Cowles (R) , Galloway (R) , Grothman (R) , Kedzie (R) , Schultz (R)

33 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , August (R) , Bernier (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Craig (R) , Endsley (R) , Jacque (R) , Kapenga (R) , Kestell (R) , Klenke (R) , Knodl (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Marklein (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Nass (R) , Nygren (R) , Petrowski (R) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Rivard (R) , Severson (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Steineke (R) , Strachota (R) , T. Larson (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tiffany (R) , Tranel (R) , Van Roy (R) , Williams (R) , Wynn (R)

Full history

  1. Oct 12, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Schultz, Galloway, Cowles, Grothman and Kedzie;Cosponsored by Representatives Marklein, Knodl, August, Bernier, Bies, Brooks, Craig, Jacque, Kapenga, Kestell, Klenke, Kooyenga, T. Larson, Mursau, Murtha, Nass, Nygren, A. Ott, Petrowski, Petryk, Ripp, Rivard, Severson, Spanbauer, Steineke, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Tiffany, Van Roy, Williams, Wynn, Zamarripa and Endsley

  2. Oct 12, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Oct 14, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 19, 2011 · Senate

    Representative Zamarripa withdrawn as a cosponsor

  5. Dec 20, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1