Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 232

Eliminating the ability for the Department of Health Services to alter Medical Assistance eligibility, provider payment methods, and other Medical Assistance program procedures by policy and eliminating the requirement to request a waiver regarding Medical Assistance program eligibility

Topics: Health Services, Department of: Health, Legislature: Finance, Joint Committee on, Medical assistance, Reports, Studies

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 12, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Currently, the Department of Health Services (DHS) administers the Medical Assistance (MA) program, which is a joint federal and state program that provides health services to individuals who have limited resources. Some services are provided through programs that operated under a waiver of federal Medicaid laws (MA waiver programs). Current law requires DHS to study potential changes to the MA state plan and to waivers of federal Medicaid law for certain purposes, including increasing the cost effectiveness and efficiency of care for the MA program and MA waiver programs and improving the health status of individuals who receive benefits under the MA program or an MA waiver program. If DHS determines that revision of existing statutes or rules would be necessary to advance any of the purposes for which the study was conducted, DHS may propose a policy to do any of the following:

require cost sharing from program benefit recipients up to the maximum allowed by the federal government; authorize providers to deny care or services if a program benefit recipient is unable to share costs; modify existing benefits or establish various benefits packages and offer different packages to different groups of recipients; revise provider reimbursement models for particular services; mandate that program benefit recipients enroll in managed care; restrict or eliminate presumptive eligibility; impose restrictions on providing benefits to individuals who are not citizens of the United States; set standards for establishing and verifying eligibility requirements; develop standards and methodologies to assure accurate eligibility determinations and redetermine continuing eligibility; and reduce income levels for purposes of determining eligibility. Before implementing a policy that conflicts with a state statute, DHS must submit to the Joint Committee on Finance under the committee's passive review process the proposed amendment to the state MA plan or proposed waiver of federal Medicaid law and estimates of the projected cost savings associated with the amendment or waiver request. If the proposed state MA plan amendment or waiver request is not rejected by the committee, DHS must submit to the federal government the amendment or waiver request, if necessary, to the extent necessary to implement its policy. If the federal government does not allow the amendment or does not grant the waiver, DHS may not implement the policy.

Read the full summary

Current law also requires DHS to request a waiver from the federal government to allow the department to implement eligibility standards, methodologies, and procedures under the state MA plan or federal Medicaid law waivers that are more restrictive than those in place on March 23, 2010. If the federal government does not approve the waiver request before December 31, 2011, DHS must reduce, on July 1, 2012, following the procedures under federal law, income levels to 133 percent of the federal poverty line for adults who are not pregnant or disabled for the purposes of determining eligibility, to the extent permitted under federal law.

This bill eliminates the requirement for DHS to conduct the study. DHS is not authorized, under the bill, to create a policy that would override elements of the MA program or MA waiver programs. The bill also eliminates the requirement for DHS to request a waiver to implement more restrictive eligibility standards, methodologies, and procedures for the MA program or MA waiver programs than those in place on March 23, 2010, and also removes the requirement that DHS reduce income eligibility levels on July 1, 2012, if that waiver is not approved by the federal government.

Who's behind it

11 senators are its ⁠. All 11 are Democrats.

20 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 31 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (20)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Senate vote to take it up right away

Failed, 15 to 17 · Nov 2, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue and take up, Ayes 15, Noes 17”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 12, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue.

  3. Oct 12, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 12, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Shilling, Vinehout, Miller, C. Larson, King, Lassa, Hansen, Risser, S. Coggs and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Pasch, Richards, Milroy, Bernard Schaber, Zamarripa, Roys, Pope-Roberts, Fields, Ringhand, Doyle, C. Taylor, Jorgensen, Sinicki, Staskunas, Hebl, Berceau, Turner, Grigsby, Seidel and Pocan

  2. Oct 12, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue

  3. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue and take up, Ayes 15, Noes 17

  4. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote