Senate Bill 234
Preaccreditation and accreditation of private schools participating in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program and the choice program for eligible school districts, certificates of occupancy for participating private school buildings, verification of income eligibility for pupils to participate in the programs, fees and tuition charged to pupils attending participating private schools, and standards of conduct for administrators of participating private schools
Topics: Milwaukee: School, Parochial and private educational institutions, Public Instruction, Department of, Religion and society, Revenue, Department of, School: Attendance, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Became law
The governor signed it on Nov 4, 2011. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 13, 2011
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Oct 25, 2011
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 65 to 27
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 47
Latest entry in the official record, Nov 7, 2011: “Published 11-18-2011”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP), the state pays all or a portion of the costs for an eligible pupil who resides within the city of Milwaukee to attend a participating private school. A pupil is eligible to participate in the MPCP if, among other requirements, the total family income of the pupil does not exceed 300 percent of the federal poverty level.
2011 Wisconsin Act 32 (the biennial budget act), created a parental choice program for eligible school districts (program). Under the program, the state pays all or a portion of the costs for an eligible pupil who resides within the eligible school district to attend a participating private school. A pupil is eligible to participate in the program if, among other requirements, the total family income of the pupil does not exceed 300 percent of the federal poverty level.
Read the full summary Show less
Current law requires a private school participating in the MPCP or the program to submit the names, social security numbers, and addresses of the applicant pupil's parents or legal guardians to the Department of Public Instruction (DPI). DPI must then forward this information to the Department of Revenue (DOR), which must determine whether the pupil is eligible to participate in the MPCP or the program on the basis of family income. This bill requires the private school to provide the names of the parents or legal guardians residing in the same household as the pupil and whether the parents or legal guardians are married. The bill defines family income as federal adjusted gross income of the parents or legal guardians residing in the same household as the pupil for the tax year preceding the school year for which family income is being verified or, if not available, for the tax year preceding the tax year preceding the school year for which family income is being verified. The bill clarifies that DOR does not make a determination about the pupil's eligibility to participate in the program on the basis of family income, but verifies whether the pupil is eligible to participate on the basis of family income. If DOR is unable to verify the pupil's eligibility, DOR must notify DPI, which must utilize an alternative process to determine whether the pupil is eligible.
Under current law, a private school participating in the MPCP or the program may only reject an applicant who is eligible to participate in the MPCP or the program if the school has too few available spaces. This bill provides that a pupil whose eligibility to participate in the program on the basis of family income has been verified by the DOR or by DPI but who is rejected because there are too few spaces may be admitted to a participating private school in the following school year as long as the pupil continues to reside in the city of Milwaukee or an eligible school district.
The bill also provides that DPI may not require verification in that following school year of the pupil's eligibility to participate on the basis of family income.
Under current law, a private school located in the city of Milwaukee may participate in the MPCP if it complies with certain requirements; among the requirements, the private school must obtain accreditation from an approved accrediting organization by December 31 of the third school year following the first school year in which the private school participated in the MPCP. Similarly, a private school located in an eligible school district may participate in the program if it complies with certain requirements, including the same accreditation requirement.
Approved accrediting organizations include the archdiocese within which the private school is located, Independent Schools Association of the Central States, and Wisconsin Religious and Independent Schools Accreditation. A private school that was participating in the MPCP on July 1, 2009, is considered to be accredited if it was approved for scholarship funding for the 2005-06 school year by Partners Advancing Values in Education (PAVE). For a private school that is a first-time participant in the MPCP or the program and that is not yet accredited by an approved accrediting organization, the private school must be preaccredited by an approved accrediting organization, including Independent Schools Association of the Central States, Wisconsin Religious and Independent Schools Accreditation, and any other organization recognized by the National Council for Private School Accreditation by August 1 before the first term of participation in the MPCP or by September 1 before the first term of participation in the program.
Under the bill, a private school participating in the MPCP that was approved for scholarship funding for the 2005-06 school year by PAVE and that is participating in the MPCP on the bill's effective date must achieve accreditation by December 31, 2015. This bill withdraws preaccreditation approval under both the MPCP and the program from organizations recognized by the National Council for Private School Accreditation. The bill identifies Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod School Accreditation and National Lutheran School Accreditation and the diocese within which the private school is located as approved accrediting and preaccrediting organizations under both the MPCP and the program.
Under current law, the state superintendent of public instruction may bar a private school from participating in the MPCP or in the program for certain specified reasons, including if the private school fails to comply with standards established for participating schools or if conditions at the private school present an imminent threat to the heath or safety of pupils.
This bill requires the state superintendent to terminate the participation of a private school in the MPCP or in the program if the private school retains, whether for compensation or on a voluntary basis, a disqualified person before the end of a seven-year period following the issuance of an order barring a private school from participating in the MPCP. The bill defines a "disqualified person" as all of the following: 1) a person who had a controlling ownership interest in, or was the administrator or an officer, director, or trustee, of, a private school at the time that the state superintendent issued an order barring the private school from participating in the MPCP or in the program; 2) a person who was designated by the administrator of the private school to assist in processing applications at the time that the state superintendent issued an order barring the private school from participating in the MPCP or in the program; and 3) a person who was responsible for the action or circumstance leading to a private school being barred from participation in the MPCP or in the program.
Current law prohibits a private school participating in the MPCP or the program from charging or receiving any additional payment for a pupil attending the school under the MPCP or the program if the pupil is enrolled in grade kindergarten to 8 or if the pupil is enrolled in grade 9 to 12 and the family income of the pupil does not exceed an amount equal to 2.2 times the poverty level determined in accordance with criteria established by the director of the federal Office of Management and Budget. Current law permits a participating private school to charge tuition and fees, in an amount to be determined by the private school, to a pupil in grade 9 to 12 provided the family income of the pupil exceeds 2.2 times the poverty level determined in accordance with criteria established by the director of the federal office of management and budget.
Beginning in the 2011-12 school year, this bill permits a private school participating in the MPCP or the program to recover the cost of providing the following to a pupil participating in the program under this section through reasonable fees in an amount determined by the private school and charged to the pupil, regardless of the family income of the pupil: a) personal use items such as uniforms and gym clothes; b) social and extracurricular activities that are not necessary to the private school's curriculum; c) musical instruments; d) meals; e) high school classes that are not required for graduation and for which no credits toward graduation are given; f) transportation; g) before-school and after-school child care. The bill prohibits the private school from recovering uncollected costs incurred prior to the effective date of the bill. The bill also prohibits the private school from expelling or preventing the pupil from attending the school or otherwise disciplining a pupil attending the school under the program, or withholding or reducing the pupil's grades because the pupil cannot pay any such fee imposed upon the pupil.
Current law requires a private school participating in the MPCP to submit a copy of the school's current certificate of occupancy, issued by the municipality within which the school is located, to DPI by August1 before the first term of participation in the MPCP. Current law requires a private school participating in the program to submit a copy of the school's current certificate of occupancy, issued by the municipality within which the school is located, to DPI by September 1 before the first term of participation in the Program. This bill provides that, if a municipality within which the private school is located does not issue certificates of occupancy, the private school may submit a certificate of occupancy issued by the local or regional governmental unit with authority to issue certificates of occupancy.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Republicans.
5 more lawmakers .
See all 8 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Leah Vukmir · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (5)
- Elizabeth Coggs · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Kestell · Republican, Assembly
- Robin Vos · Republican, Assembly
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 7 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Education vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 24, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 16 · Oct 25, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 16 · Oct 25, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 16 · Oct 25, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 16 · Oct 25, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 65 to 27 · Nov 3, 2011 · 2 didn't vote
See how each of the 94 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican
Yes (65)
- Alvin Ott (R, 3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bill Kramer (R, 97)
- Bob Ziegelbauer (I, 25)
- Chad Weininger (R, 4)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Cory Mason (D, 66)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dan Meyer (R, 34)
- Daniel LeMahieu (R, 59)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Dean Knudson (R, 30)
- Don Pridemore (R, 22)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Elizabeth Coggs (D, 10)
- Evan Wynn (R, 43)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jason Fields (D, 11)
- Jeff Fitzgerald (R, 39)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeffrey Stone (R, 82)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Knilans (R, 44)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Klenke (R, 88)
- John Murtha (R, 29)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Karl Van Roy (R, 90)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Keith Ripp (R, 42)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Mark Honadel (R, 21)
- Mark Radcliffe (D, 92)
- Michelle Litjens (R, 56)
- Mike Endsley (R, 26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Pat Strachota (R, 58)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (D, 57)
- Richard Spanbauer (R, 53)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Roger Rivard (R, 75)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Scott Suder (R, 69)
- Steve Kestell (R, 27)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Thomas Larson (R, 67)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
No (27)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (D, 70)
- Andy Jorgensen (D, 43)
- Barbara Toles (D, 17)
- Brett Hulsey (D, 78)
- Chris Danou (D, 92)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- David Cullen (D, 13)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- John Steinbrink (D, 65)
- Jon Richards (D, 19)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Louis Molepske Jr. (D, 71)
- Margaret Krusick (D, 7)
- Mark Pocan (D, 78)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Robert Turner (D, 61)
- Sandy Pasch (D, 10)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Tamara Grigsby (D, 18)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
- Tony Staskunas (D, 15)
Didn't vote (2)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Mary Williams (R, 87)
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 65, Noes 27, Paired 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 86 to 8 · Nov 3, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 86, Noes 8”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Nov 7, 2011
The new law was published.
-
Nov 4, 2011
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 47.
-
Nov 4, 2011
Sent to the governor.
-
Nov 3, 2011
The Assembly passed it too, 65 to 27.
-
Oct 27, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 27, 2011
The Assembly received it.
-
Oct 27, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 25, 2011
The Senate passed it.
-
Oct 25, 2011
The Senate adopted it.
-
Oct 24, 2011
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 1.
-
Oct 24, 2011
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 24, 2011
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 19, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 19, 2011
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 13, 2011
Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.
-
Oct 13, 2011
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 13, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Vukmir, Darling and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Fields, E. Coggs, Kestell, Young and Vos
- Oct 13, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- Oct 19, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Vukmir
- Oct 19, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Vukmir
- Oct 19, 2011 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 19, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 19, 2011 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 24, 2011 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Oct 24, 2011 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Oct 24, 2011 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- Oct 24, 2011 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 24, 2011 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-25-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 3 offered by Senators Taylor, Lassa, Miller, T. Cullen, King, Holperin, Vinehout, C. Larson and Erpenbach
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 4 offered by Senators Taylor, Lassa, Miller, T. Cullen, King, C. Larson, Erpenbach and S. Coggs
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 5 offered by Senators Taylor, Lassa, Miller, T. Cullen, King, Holperin, C. Larson, Erpenbach and S. Coggs
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 6 offered by Senators Taylor, C. Larson, King, Miller, Erpenbach, T. Cullen, Lassa and S. Coggs
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-1-2011 by committee on Rules
- Nov 1, 2011 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:12 A.M. on 11-03-2011 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 18
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Krusick
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 86, Noes 8
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 65, Noes 27, Paired 4
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 4, 2011 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Nov 4, 2011 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 11-4-2011
- Nov 4, 2011 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 11-4-2011
- Nov 4, 2011 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 11-4-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 47
- Nov 7, 2011 · Senate
Published 11-18-2011
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote