Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 234

Preaccreditation and accreditation of private schools participating in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program and the choice program for eligible school districts, certificates of occupancy for participating private school buildings, verification of income eligibility for pupils to participate in the programs, fees and tuition charged to pupils attending participating private schools, and standards of conduct for administrators of participating private schools

Topics: Milwaukee: School, Parochial and private educational institutions, Public Instruction, Department of, Religion and society, Revenue, Department of, School: Attendance, State Superintendent of Public Instruction

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 4, 2011. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 13, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Oct 25, 2011

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 65 to 27

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 47

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 7, 2011: “Published 11-18-2011”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP), the state pays all or a portion of the costs for an eligible pupil who resides within the city of Milwaukee to attend a participating private school. A pupil is eligible to participate in the MPCP if, among other requirements, the total family income of the pupil does not exceed 300 percent of the federal poverty level.

2011 Wisconsin Act 32 (the biennial budget act), created a parental choice program for eligible school districts (program). Under the program, the state pays all or a portion of the costs for an eligible pupil who resides within the eligible school district to attend a participating private school. A pupil is eligible to participate in the program if, among other requirements, the total family income of the pupil does not exceed 300 percent of the federal poverty level.

Read the full summary

Current law requires a private school participating in the MPCP or the program to submit the names, social security numbers, and addresses of the applicant pupil's parents or legal guardians to the Department of Public Instruction (DPI). DPI must then forward this information to the Department of Revenue (DOR), which must determine whether the pupil is eligible to participate in the MPCP or the program on the basis of family income. This bill requires the private school to provide the names of the parents or legal guardians residing in the same household as the pupil and whether the parents or legal guardians are married. The bill defines family income as federal adjusted gross income of the parents or legal guardians residing in the same household as the pupil for the tax year preceding the school year for which family income is being verified or, if not available, for the tax year preceding the tax year preceding the school year for which family income is being verified. The bill clarifies that DOR does not make a determination about the pupil's eligibility to participate in the program on the basis of family income, but verifies whether the pupil is eligible to participate on the basis of family income. If DOR is unable to verify the pupil's eligibility, DOR must notify DPI, which must utilize an alternative process to determine whether the pupil is eligible.

Under current law, a private school participating in the MPCP or the program may only reject an applicant who is eligible to participate in the MPCP or the program if the school has too few available spaces. This bill provides that a pupil whose eligibility to participate in the program on the basis of family income has been verified by the DOR or by DPI but who is rejected because there are too few spaces may be admitted to a participating private school in the following school year as long as the pupil continues to reside in the city of Milwaukee or an eligible school district.

The bill also provides that DPI may not require verification in that following school year of the pupil's eligibility to participate on the basis of family income.

Under current law, a private school located in the city of Milwaukee may participate in the MPCP if it complies with certain requirements; among the requirements, the private school must obtain accreditation from an approved accrediting organization by December 31 of the third school year following the first school year in which the private school participated in the MPCP. Similarly, a private school located in an eligible school district may participate in the program if it complies with certain requirements, including the same accreditation requirement.

Approved accrediting organizations include the archdiocese within which the private school is located, Independent Schools Association of the Central States, and Wisconsin Religious and Independent Schools Accreditation. A private school that was participating in the MPCP on July 1, 2009, is considered to be accredited if it was approved for scholarship funding for the 2005-06 school year by Partners Advancing Values in Education (PAVE). For a private school that is a first-time participant in the MPCP or the program and that is not yet accredited by an approved accrediting organization, the private school must be preaccredited by an approved accrediting organization, including Independent Schools Association of the Central States, Wisconsin Religious and Independent Schools Accreditation, and any other organization recognized by the National Council for Private School Accreditation by August 1 before the first term of participation in the MPCP or by September 1 before the first term of participation in the program.

Under the bill, a private school participating in the MPCP that was approved for scholarship funding for the 2005-06 school year by PAVE and that is participating in the MPCP on the bill's effective date must achieve accreditation by December 31, 2015. This bill withdraws preaccreditation approval under both the MPCP and the program from organizations recognized by the National Council for Private School Accreditation. The bill identifies Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod School Accreditation and National Lutheran School Accreditation and the diocese within which the private school is located as approved accrediting and preaccrediting organizations under both the MPCP and the program.

Under current law, the state superintendent of public instruction may bar a private school from participating in the MPCP or in the program for certain specified reasons, including if the private school fails to comply with standards established for participating schools or if conditions at the private school present an imminent threat to the heath or safety of pupils.

This bill requires the state superintendent to terminate the participation of a private school in the MPCP or in the program if the private school retains, whether for compensation or on a voluntary basis, a disqualified person before the end of a seven-year period following the issuance of an order barring a private school from participating in the MPCP. The bill defines a "disqualified person" as all of the following: 1) a person who had a controlling ownership interest in, or was the administrator or an officer, director, or trustee, of, a private school at the time that the state superintendent issued an order barring the private school from participating in the MPCP or in the program; 2) a person who was designated by the administrator of the private school to assist in processing applications at the time that the state superintendent issued an order barring the private school from participating in the MPCP or in the program; and 3) a person who was responsible for the action or circumstance leading to a private school being barred from participation in the MPCP or in the program.

Current law prohibits a private school participating in the MPCP or the program from charging or receiving any additional payment for a pupil attending the school under the MPCP or the program if the pupil is enrolled in grade kindergarten to 8 or if the pupil is enrolled in grade 9 to 12 and the family income of the pupil does not exceed an amount equal to 2.2 times the poverty level determined in accordance with criteria established by the director of the federal Office of Management and Budget. Current law permits a participating private school to charge tuition and fees, in an amount to be determined by the private school, to a pupil in grade 9 to 12 provided the family income of the pupil exceeds 2.2 times the poverty level determined in accordance with criteria established by the director of the federal office of management and budget.

Beginning in the 2011-12 school year, this bill permits a private school participating in the MPCP or the program to recover the cost of providing the following to a pupil participating in the program under this section through reasonable fees in an amount determined by the private school and charged to the pupil, regardless of the family income of the pupil: a) personal use items such as uniforms and gym clothes; b) social and extracurricular activities that are not necessary to the private school's curriculum; c) musical instruments; d) meals; e) high school classes that are not required for graduation and for which no credits toward graduation are given; f) transportation; g) before-school and after-school child care. The bill prohibits the private school from recovering uncollected costs incurred prior to the effective date of the bill. The bill also prohibits the private school from expelling or preventing the pupil from attending the school or otherwise disciplining a pupil attending the school under the program, or withholding or reducing the pupil's grades because the pupil cannot pay any such fee imposed upon the pupil.

Current law requires a private school participating in the MPCP to submit a copy of the school's current certificate of occupancy, issued by the municipality within which the school is located, to DPI by August1 before the first term of participation in the MPCP. Current law requires a private school participating in the program to submit a copy of the school's current certificate of occupancy, issued by the municipality within which the school is located, to DPI by September 1 before the first term of participation in the Program. This bill provides that, if a municipality within which the private school is located does not issue certificates of occupancy, the private school may submit a certificate of occupancy issued by the local or regional governmental unit with authority to issue certificates of occupancy.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. All 3 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 7 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Education vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 24, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 16 · Oct 25, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 16 · Oct 25, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 16 · Oct 25, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 16 · Oct 25, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 65 to 27 · Nov 3, 2011 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 94 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (65)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 65, Noes 27, Paired 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 86 to 8 · Nov 3, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 86, Noes 8”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 7, 2011

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 4, 2011

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 47.

  3. Nov 4, 2011

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 3, 2011

    The Assembly passed it too, 65 to 27.

  5. Oct 27, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Oct 27, 2011

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Oct 27, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Oct 25, 2011

    The Senate passed it.

  9. Oct 25, 2011

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Oct 24, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 1.

  11. Oct 24, 2011

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Oct 24, 2011

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  13. Oct 19, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Oct 19, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Oct 13, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  16. Oct 13, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 13, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Vukmir, Darling and Olsen;Cosponsored by Representatives Fields, E. Coggs, Kestell, Young and Vos

  2. Oct 13, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Vukmir

  4. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Vukmir

  5. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Oct 24, 2011 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  9. Oct 24, 2011 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  10. Oct 24, 2011 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  11. Oct 24, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Oct 24, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-25-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  15. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  16. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 offered by Senators Taylor, Lassa, Miller, T. Cullen, King, Holperin, Vinehout, C. Larson and Erpenbach

  17. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16

  18. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 offered by Senators Taylor, Lassa, Miller, T. Cullen, King, C. Larson, Erpenbach and S. Coggs

  19. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16

  20. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 offered by Senators Taylor, Lassa, Miller, T. Cullen, King, Holperin, C. Larson, Erpenbach and S. Coggs

  21. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16

  22. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 6 offered by Senators Taylor, C. Larson, King, Miller, Erpenbach, T. Cullen, Lassa and S. Coggs

  23. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Senate amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16

  24. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  27. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  28. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  30. Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  31. Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-1-2011 by committee on Rules

  32. Nov 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:12 A.M. on 11-03-2011 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 18

  33. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  34. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Krusick

  35. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 86, Noes 8

  36. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  37. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  38. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 65, Noes 27, Paired 4

  39. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  40. Nov 4, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  41. Nov 4, 2011 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-4-2011

  42. Nov 4, 2011 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-4-2011

  43. Nov 4, 2011 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-4-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 47

  44. Nov 7, 2011 · Senate

    Published 11-18-2011

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote