Senate Bill 237
Providing instruction in human growth and development
Topics: Federal aid, Nonmarital child, School: Board, School: Health program, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 14, 2011
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 25 to 7
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 60 to 34
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 216
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a school board may offer an instructional program in human growth and development (instructional program). If the school board offers an instructional program, the instructional program must provide medically accurate information and, when age appropriate, address all of the following: 1) communication between the pupil and the pupil's parents or guardians about sexuality; 2) reproductive and sexual anatomy and physiology; 3) puberty, pregnancy, parenting, body image, and gender stereotypes; 4) skills to make responsible decisions about sexuality and sexual behavior throughout the pupil's life span, including how to recognize, rebuff, and report unwanted or inappropriate verbal, physical, or sexual behaviors; 5) the benefits of and reasons for abstaining from sexual activity; 6) the health benefits, side effects, and proper use of contraceptives and barrier methods approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prevent pregnancy and barrier methods approved by the FDA to prevent sexually transmitted infections; 7) methods for developing healthy life skills, including setting goals, responsible decision making, communication, and stress management; 8) how alcohol or drug use affects responsible decision making;
and 9) the impact of media and peer messages on thoughts, feelings, and behaviors related to sexuality. If a school board provides instruction in any of the subject areas enumerated in items 1 to 9, it must do all of the following: a) ensure that instruction in marriage and family responsibility is provided, but not necessarily in the same course or during the same school year; b) instruct pupils about the criminal penalties for engaging in sexual activities involving a child; and c) instruct pupils about sex offender registration requirements.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill recommends, rather than requires, instructional topics for a school board that elects to provide an instructional program and restructures the recommended curriculum. The bill eliminates from the current law curriculum items 3 and 6, above, but retains discussion of pregnancy, parenting, and gender stereotypes in other portions of the recommended curriculum. The bill modifies item 4 by adding discussion of bullying, and modifies item 5 to require the instruction under that item to identify the skills necessary to remain abstinent. The bill also adds the following subjects to the recommended topics, instruction of which is to be medically accurate and provided when age appropriate: adoption resources, prenatal care, and postnatal supports, and the nature and treatment of sexually transmitted infections, personal responsibility, and the positive connection between marriage and parenting.
The bill requires a school board that offers an instructional program to do all of the following in the same course and during the same year: 1) present abstinence as the preferred choice of behavior for unmarried pupils; 2) emphasize that abstinence is the only reliable way to prevent pregnancy and avoid sexually transmitted infections; 3) provide instruction in parental responsibility and the socioeconomic benefits of marriage; and 4) explain pregnancy, prenatal development, and childbirth. The bill also permits a school board to provide the instructional program to pupils while the pupils are separated from members of the opposite sex.
Under current law, the instructional program must also do all of the following:
1) use instructional methods and materials that do not promote bias against pupils of any race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnic or cultural background or against sexually active pupils or children with disabilities; 2) promote self-esteem and positive interpersonal skills, with an emphasis on healthy relationships; and 3) identify counseling, medical, and legal resources for survivors of sexual abuse and assault, including resources for escaping violent relationships. This bill replaces item 1, above, with a reference to a provision under current law that prohibits discrimination in public schools.
Current law defines "medically accurate information" as information that satisfies all of the following: 1) the information is supported by the weight of research conducted in compliance with accepted scientific methods; 2) where appropriate, the information is published in peer-reviewed journals; and 3) the information is recognized as accurate by relevant leading professional organizations or agencies, such as the American Medical Association, the American Public Health Association, or the American Academy of Pediatrics. Current law defines "age appropriate" as suitable to a particular age group of pupils based on the developing cognitive and emotional capacity of and behaviors typical for the age group. Current law permits a school district to eliminate from the human sexuality and development curriculum information that is not age appropriate.
This bill modifies the definition for "medically accurate information" to mean information that is scientifically-based and published, where appropriate, in peer-reviewed journals and textbooks. The bill also modifies the definition of "age-appropriate" to mean suitable to a particular age group of pupils based on their developing cognitive and emotional capacity and consistent with adolescent development and community standards.
Current law permits a pupil's parent or guardian to request that the pupil be exempt from participating in the instructional program. Current law also requires each school board that provides an instructional program to distribute an outline of the curriculum to the parents or guardians of each pupil enrolled in the district. This bill modifies the exemption to clarify that an exempted pupil will still receive instruction on how to recognize, avoid, prevent, and halt physically or psychologically intrusive or abusive situations. The bill also modifies the exemption to clarify that an exempted high school pupil will receive instruction in physiology and hygiene and the effects of alcohol and controlled substances on the body unless the pupil has also been exempted from this instruction. The bill provides that the school district must provide an explanation of these exemptions along with the outline of the curriculum.
Current law requires each school board that elects not to offer an instructional program to notify each pupil's parent or guardian of this fact. This bill eliminates that requirement. Current law also requires the state superintendent to apply for federal funds to implement an evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention program.
This bill requires the state superintendent to apply for all federal funds allocated for providing instruction in any of the recommended or required topics.
Current law requires each school district that offers an instructional program to appoint an advisory committee composed of parents, teachers, school administrators, pupils, health care professionals, members of the clergy, and other residents of the school district. The committee is required under current law to review the curriculum at least every three years. This bill specifies that the purpose of the committee is to advise the school board on the design and implementation of the curriculum and to review the curriculum every three years. The bill also provides that no one category of member may constitute more than one fifth of the membership of the committee and no more than one quarter of the committee may be made up of employees of the school district or their spouses or members of the school board or their spouses.
Under current law, a volunteer health care provider (provider) may apply to the Department of Administration to be permitted to provide health care services without charge in a school or nonprofit agency. If the provider wishes to provide services at a school, the provider must file the application jointly with the school board or, if the school is a charter school, the governing body of the school. "Volunteer health care provider" is defined under current law as a physician, dentist or dental hygienist, registered nurse, practical nurse, nurse-midwife, nurse practitioner, optometrist, physician assistant, or dietitian who receives no income from the practice of that health care profession or who receives no income from the practice of that health care profession when providing services at the school. Under current law, the provider may provide instruction in human growth and development if the instructional program complies with the requirements above. This bill prevents a provider from providing instruction in human growth and development.
Who's behind it
4 senators are its . All 4 are Republicans.
23 more lawmakers .
See all 27 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Pam Galloway · Republican, Senate
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
- Mary Lazich · Republican, Senate
- Joe Leibham · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (23)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- David Craig · Republican, Senate
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Joel Kleefisch · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Dale Kooyenga · Republican, Senate
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Michelle Litjens · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Meyer · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- John Nygren · Republican, Assembly
- Don Pridemore · Republican, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
- Thomas Larson · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Evan Wynn · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Ziegelbauer · Independent, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
- Amendment AA1-SB237
- Amendment AA2-SB237
- Amendment AA3-SB237
- Amendment AA4-SB237
- Amendment AA5-SB237
- Amendment AA6-SB237
- Amendment AA7-SB237
- Amendment SA1-SB237
- Amendment SA2-SB237
- Amendment SA3-SB237
- Amendment SA4-SB237
- Amendment SA5-SB237
- Amendment SA6-SB237
- Amendment SA7-SB237
- Amendment SA8-SB237
- Amendment SA9-SB237
- Amendment SA10-SB237
- Amendment SA11-SB237
- Amendment SA12-SB237
- Amendment SA13-SB237
- LC Amendment Memo
How lawmakers voted
There were 11 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Education vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 27, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 2, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 25 to 7 · Nov 2, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 7 adopted, Ayes 25, Noes 7”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 2, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 17 to 15 · Nov 2, 2011 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (17)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Pam Galloway (R, 29)
- Rich Zipperer (R, 33)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (15)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jessica King (D, 18)
- Jim Holperin (D, 12)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Spencer Coggs (D, 6)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
Didn't vote (1)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 17, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 60 to 34 · Mar 13, 2012 · 3 didn't vote
See how each of the 97 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican
Yes (60)
- Alvin Ott (R, 3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bill Kramer (R, 97)
- Bob Ziegelbauer (I, 25)
- Chad Weininger (R, 4)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Daniel LeMahieu (R, 59)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Dean Knudson (R, 30)
- Don Pridemore (R, 22)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Erik Severson (R, 28)
- Evan Wynn (R, 43)
- Garey Bies (R, 1)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jeff Fitzgerald (R, 39)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeffrey Stone (R, 82)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Knilans (R, 44)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Klenke (R, 88)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- Karl Van Roy (R, 90)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Keith Ripp (R, 42)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Margaret Krusick (D, 7)
- Mark Honadel (R, 21)
- Mary Williams (R, 87)
- Michelle Litjens (R, 56)
- Mike Endsley (R, 26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Pat Strachota (R, 58)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Richard Spanbauer (R, 53)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Roger Rivard (R, 75)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Scott Suder (R, 69)
- Steve Kestell (R, 27)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Thomas Larson (R, 67)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tony Staskunas (D, 15)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
No (34)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (D, 70)
- Andy Jorgensen (D, 43)
- Barbara Toles (D, 17)
- Brett Hulsey (D, 78)
- Chris Danou (D, 92)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Cory Mason (D, 66)
- David Cullen (D, 13)
- Donna Seidel (D, 85)
- Elizabeth Coggs (D, 10)
- Fred Clark (D, 81)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- Jon Richards (D, 19)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Louis Molepske Jr. (D, 71)
- Mark Pocan (D, 78)
- Mark Radcliffe (D, 92)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (D, 57)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Robert Turner (D, 61)
- Sandy Pasch (D, 10)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
Didn't vote (3)
- Dan Meyer (R, 34)
- Jason Fields (D, 11)
- John Steinbrink (D, 65)
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 60, Noes 34, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 60 to 34 · Mar 13, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 60 to 34 · Mar 13, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 59 to 35 · Mar 13, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 60 to 34 · Mar 13, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 58 to 36 · Mar 13, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 10, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 6, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 216.
-
Mar 29, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Assembly passed it too, 60 to 34.
-
Jan 27, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Nov 7, 2011
The Assembly received it.
-
Nov 2, 2011
The Senate passed it, 17 to 15.
-
Nov 2, 2011
The Senate adopted it.
-
Nov 2, 2011
The Senate adopted it, 25 to 7.
-
Nov 2, 2011
“Placed at the foot of the calendar of 11-2-2011” (the official wording)
-
Oct 27, 2011
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.
-
Oct 27, 2011
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 7 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 1” (the official wording)
-
Oct 27, 2011
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 7 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education” (the official wording)
-
Oct 27, 2011
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 6 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education” (the official wording)
-
Oct 27, 2011
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 5 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education” (the official wording)
-
Oct 27, 2011
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 4 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education” (the official wording)
-
Oct 27, 2011
“Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education” (the official wording)
-
Oct 25, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 19, 2011
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 14, 2011
Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.
-
Oct 14, 2011
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 14, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lazich, Galloway, Grothman and Leibham;Cosponsored by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Bernier, Bies, Brooks, Craig, Jacque, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kooyenga, T. Larson, Litjens, Meyer, Nass, Nygren, A. Ott, Pridemore, Ripp, Spanbauer, Strachota, Stroebel, Wynn, Ziegelbauer and LeMahieu
- Oct 14, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- Oct 19, 2011 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 26, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman
- Oct 26, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Grothman
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 4 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 5 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 6 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Amendment 7 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 7 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Oct 27, 2011 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 1, 2011 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-2-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 11-2-2011
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 7 adopted, Ayes 25, Noes 7
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 8 offered by Senators Grothman and T. Cullen
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 8 adopted
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 9 offered by Senators Vinehout, Holperin, C. Larson, King, Shilling, T. Cullen, S. Coggs, Risser, Miller, Hansen, Erpenbach and Taylor
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 10 offered by Senator Lazich
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 10 adopted
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 11 offered by Senators C. Larson, Holperin, Vinehout, Taylor, Miller, Risser, S. Coggs, T. Cullen, Shilling, King and Erpenbach
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 11 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 15
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 12 offered by Senators C. Larson, Holperin, Vinehout, Taylor, Miller, Risser, Carpenter, S. Coggs, T. Cullen, Shilling, King and Erpenbach
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 12 adopted
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 13 offered by Senators C. Larson and Erpenbach
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Senate amendment 13 laid on table
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 17, Noes 15
- Nov 2, 2011 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 7, 2011 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 27, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:05 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Roys
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Roys
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 withdrawn and returned to author
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Zamarripa
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative C. Taylor
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Hintz
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 35
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representatives Pasch, Pocan and Zamarripa
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representatives Vruwink, Pasch, Pope-Roberts, Hintz, Milroy, Sinicki, Danou, Zepnick, Jorgensen and Doyle
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 60, Noes 34, Paired 2
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 22, 2012 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 22, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-22-2012
- Mar 29, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-29-2012
- Apr 6, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-5-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 216
- Apr 10, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-19-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote