Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 26

Bonding authority for major interstate bridge projects

Topics: Bridge, Debt, Public, Road: Construction and repair, Road: Expressway, Transportation, Department of: Roads

Became law

The governor signed it on Jun 27, 2011. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 1, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 23 to 10

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 71 to 26

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 30

Latest entry in the official record, Jul 7, 2011: “Published 7-11-2011”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law authorizes the state to contract public debt in an amount not to exceed $225,000,000, in the form of general obligation bonds, for purposes of funding major interstate bridge projects. A major interstate bridge project is defined to mean "a project involving the construction or reconstruction of a bridge on the state trunk highway system, including approaches, that crosses a river forming a boundary of the state and for which this state's estimated cost share is at least $100,000,000."

Under current law, the Department of Transportation may not encumber or expend any funds collected under this bonding authorization unless the state receives federal funds that are designated by the federal government for a major interstate bridge project and that cover at least $75,000,000 of the state's share of the project's cost.

Read the full summary

This bill eliminates the requirement that the state receive federal funds covering a portion of the project's cost before expending or encumbering funds collected under the bonding authorization.

Who's behind it

Sheila Harsdorf, a Republican, is its ⁠.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 4 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · May 3, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 23 to 10 · May 10, 2011

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 23, Noes 10”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 2 · Jun 2, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 71 to 26 · Jun 8, 2011 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (71)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 71, Noes 26”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Jul 7, 2011

    The new law was published.

  2. Jun 27, 2011

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 30.

  3. Jun 22, 2011

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jun 8, 2011

    The Assembly passed it too, 71 to 26.

  5. Jun 2, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Jun 2, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 2.

  7. May 24, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. May 10, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  9. May 10, 2011

    The Assembly received it.

  10. May 10, 2011

    The Senate passed it, 23 to 10.

  11. May 3, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  12. Apr 28, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Mar 24, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Mar 1, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.

  15. Mar 1, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 1, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Harsdorf;Cosponsored by Representatives Knudson, Murtha and Severson

  2. Mar 1, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  3. Mar 24, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 28, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. May 3, 2011 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. May 3, 2011 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. May 3, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. May 9, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-10-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  10. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  12. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 23, Noes 10

  13. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. May 10, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. May 10, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  16. May 24, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  17. Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  18. Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 2

  19. Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  20. Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-8-2011 by committee on Rules

  21. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 71, Noes 26

  25. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Jun 8, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Jun 13, 2011 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 6-13-2011

  28. Jun 22, 2011 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 6-22-2011

  29. Jun 27, 2011 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 6-24-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 30

  30. Jul 7, 2011 · Senate

    Published 7-11-2011

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote