Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
setback requirements for wind energy systems and granting rule-making authority.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Public Service Commission (PSC), with the advice of the
Wind Siting Council, must promulgate rules specifying the restrictions that a city,
village, town, or county may impose on the installation or use of a "wind energy
system," which is defined as equipment and associated facilities that convert and
then store or transfer wind energy into usable forms of energy. The restrictions must
satisfy certain conditions, including preserving or protecting the public health or
safety and not significantly increasing the cost of a wind energy system or
significantly decreasing its efficiency. In addition, the subject matter of the rules
must include setback requirements and decommissioning, and may include other
matters. Current law prohibits a city, village, town, or county from placing a
restriction on the installation or use of a wind energy system that is more restrictive
than the PSC's rules.
This bill requires that the PSC promulgate rules specifying setback
requirements that a city, village, town, or county may impose on a wind energy
system, but not until after the PSC receives a report from the Department of Health
Services (DHS) regarding an epidemiological study that evaluates the health
impacts of wind energy systems on people and animals near such systems. DHS may
encourage interested persons to submit such a study to DHS, or DHS may survey
scientific literature for such a study. The bill provides that the study must be
scientifically sound and peer-reviewed and must do the following: 1) include the
health impacts of low frequency sound and infrasound resulting from wind energy
systems; 2) evaluate the differences in health impacts, if any, on people and animals
in different proximities to and directions from such systems; and 3) evaluate any
differences associated with different wind speeds and directions. DHS must submit
a report describing the study's findings to both the PSC and the legislature. In
carrying out its duties regarding the report, DHS must consult with University of
Wisconsin System personnel with the requisite expertise to evaluate such a study.
Upon receipt of DHS's report, the bill requires the PSC to promulgate rules
specifying the setback requirements that a city, village, town, or county may impose
on the installation and use of a wind energy system. The rules must be based on the
findings of the study that is the subject of the report. As under current law, the bill
prohibits a city, village, town, or county from imposing a setback requirement that
is more restrictive than the PSC's rules.
The bill also prohibits a person from commencing construction of a large wind
energy system prior to the effective date of the rules required under the bill. The bill
defines "large wind energy system" as a wind energy system that: 1) has a total
installed nameplate capacity of more than 300 kilowatts; and 2) consists of
individual wind turbines that have an installed nameplate capacity of more than 100
kilowatts. This prohibition applies notwithstanding the approval of a large wind
energy system by a city, village, town, or county. The bill includes legislative findings
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Oct 28, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lasee and Grothman;Cosponsored by Representatives Jacque, Bies, Pridemore, Van Roy, Murtha and Thiesfeldt
- Oct 28, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Energy, Biotechnology, and Consumer Protection
- Nov 14, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 2, 2011 · Senate
Withdrawn from committee on Energy, Biotechnology, and Consumer Protection and rereferred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, pursuant to Senate Rule 46 (2)(c)
- Jan 13, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1