Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 283

Unauthorized possession of a correctional employee's personal identifying information and providing a penalty

Topics: Crime and criminals, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Mental health: Hospitals and institutes, Prison, Privacy

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 4, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits the unauthorized use of another person's personal identifying information or documents related to the person's identifying information.

Personal identifying information includes an individual's name, address, telephone number, driver's or employment identification number, the maiden name of an individual's mother, social security number, taxpayer's identification number, access code for an individual's bank or other account, an individual's unique biometric data, including fingerprint, voice print, retina or iris image, or deoxyribonucleic acid profile.

Read the full summary

Under current law, a person who intentionally uses, attempts to use, or possesses with the intent to use another person's personal identifying information or documents to obtain something of value, to avoid civil or criminal process or penalty, or to harm the reputation or property of the person is guilty of a Class H felony and may be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to six years, or both.

Under current law, a person who is the victim of the unauthorized use of his or her personal identifying information or documents may obtain a security freeze on his or her credit reports free of charge, if he or she submits proof to a credit reporting agency that he or she reported the unauthorized use to a law enforcement agency.

This bill prohibits the possession, by a person who is incarcerated in a prison or who resides in a mental health facility, of a correctional employee's personal identifying information or a document relating to the employee's personal identifying information. A person who violates this prohibition is guilty of a Class H felony. Under the bill, a correctional employee who is the victim of an unauthorized possession of his or her personal identifying information or documents may obtain a security freeze on his or her credit reports free of charge, if he or she submits proof to a credit reporting agency that he or she reported the unauthorized possession to a law enforcement agency.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

6 senators are its ⁠. 3 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Labor vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 29, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 29, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  3. Feb 29, 2012

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  4. Nov 29, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Nov 18, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Nov 11, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Nov 4, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs.

  8. Nov 4, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 4, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators King, Shilling, Moulton, Schultz, Wanggaard and Erpenbach;Cosponsored by Representatives Hintz, Berceau, Pope-Roberts, Radcliffe, Sinicki, Spanbauer, Wynn, Zepnick and Steineke

  2. Nov 4, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs

  3. Nov 11, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 18, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Nov 29, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 23, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senators Wanggaard and King

  7. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote