Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 294

Procedures for establishing a claim (suggested as remedial legislation by the Office of the State Treasurer)

Topics: Circuit court, Statutes: Revision, Treasurer: State

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 18, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person may claim an interest in abandoned, intangible property by filing a claim with the state treasurer. Intangible property is presumed to be abandoned if it is held, issued, or owing in the ordinary course of a holder's business and it has remained unclaimed by the owner for more than five years after it became payable or distributable. Current law requires the state treasurer to consider each claim within 90 days after the claim is filed. The state treasurer may also refer a claim to the attorney general for an opinion on whether to either allow the claim or deny the claim in whole or in part.

A person aggrieved by a decision of the state treasurer or whose claim has not been acted upon within 90 days (claimant) may, under current law, bring an action to establish the claim in circuit court. If, in circuit court, the claimant establishes the claim against the state treasurer, the court must award costs and reasonable attorney fees to the claimant.

Read the full summary

This bill permits a claimant to petition for judicial review of the decision or inaction of the state treasurer under chapter 227 of the statutes; chapter 227 establishes uniform procedures for the review of administrative actions and decisions. The bill also eliminates the mandatory award of costs and reasonable attorneys fees to a claimant who prevails against the state treasurer in circuit court in those cases in which the circuit court determines the state treasurer was substantially justified in taking its position or in which special circumstances exist that would make the award of costs and attorney fees unjust.

This bill is explained in the Notes provided by the Joint Legislative Council in the bill.

Who's behind it

Glenn Grothman, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 25, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Nov 18, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  4. Nov 18, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 18, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Grothman;Cosponsored by Representative Kramer

  2. Nov 18, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Jan 25, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 29, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman

  5. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor