Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 300

The length of time for which a variance applies

Topics: County: Ordinance, Land use planning and control, Municipality: Ordinance

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 22, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 21, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 7, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 76 to 5

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 135

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Published 4-4-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a city, village, or town that is authorized to exercise village powers (municipality) or county is authorized to enact zoning ordinances that regulate and restrict the height, number of stories, and size of buildings and other structures, the percentage of lot that may be occupied, the size of yards and other open spaces, the density of population, and the location and use of buildings, structures, and land for various purposes.

A municipality's board of appeals or a county's board of adjustment (board) is authorized under current law to hear and decide appeals that allege there is an error in the enforcement of a zoning ordinance, to hear and decide special exceptions to the terms of a zoning ordinance, and to authorize a variance from the terms of a zoning ordinance. A "use" variance grants permission for a use that is not permitted by the zoning ordinance, and an "area" variance relaxes restrictions on dimensions, such as setback, frontage, height, bulk, density, and area. To grant a variance, a board must find four things:

Read the full summary

1. The variance will not be contrary to the public interest.

2. Substantial justice will be done by granting the variance.

3. The variance is needed so that the spirit of the ordinance is observed.

4. Due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship.

This bill authorizes a municipality or county to enact an ordinance specifying an expiration date for a variance. If no such ordinance exits, however, the bill specifies that a variance that is granted does not expire unless the board specifies in the variance, at the time it is granted, a date after which the variance does not apply.

The bill also codifies a court decision ( Goldberg v. Milwaukee Zoning Appeals Board , 115 Wis. 2d 517 (Ct. App. 1983)) stating that a variance runs with the land.

The bill first applies, retroactively, to a variance that was granted before the effective date of the bill.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. All 3 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (5)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 28, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 76 to 5 · Mar 15, 2012 · 16 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (76)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 76, Noes 5, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 22, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 135.

  3. Mar 20, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 76 to 5.

  5. Mar 9, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 9, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Mar 7, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Mar 7, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Mar 7, 2012

    “Placed at the foot of the 11th order order of business on the calendar of 03-07-2012” (the official wording)

  10. Feb 28, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  11. Feb 1, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Nov 21, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  13. Nov 21, 2011

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 21, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lasee, Darling and Grothman;Cosponsored by Representatives Steineke, Stroebel, Bies, Rivard and Jacque

  2. Nov 21, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Feb 1, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 27, 2012 · Senate

    LRB correction

  5. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lasee

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-7-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Placed at the foot of the 11th order order of business on the calendar of 03-07-2012

  12. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Lasee and Lazich

  13. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  14. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:02 P.M. on 3-15-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 25

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 76, Noes 5, Paired 2

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-20-2012

  28. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012

  29. Mar 22, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 135

  30. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-4-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote