Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
creating a preference in state procurement for Wisconsin-based businesses.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law generally requires that state agencies or other authorized state
purchasing agents award orders and contracts for materials, supplies, equipment,
and contractual services to the entity that provides the lowest responsible bid or most
advantageous competitive proposal. Current law contains several exceptions to this
requirement. One exception is a preference for Wisconsin producers, distributors,
suppliers, and retailers over any out-of-state vendor that is domiciled in a
jurisdiction that grants a preference to vendors domiciled in that jurisdiction. This
bill deletes this exception and, instead, requires state agencies and other purchasing
agents to maximize the awards given to businesses that have at least 50 percent of
their operations in Wisconsin or that plan to have at least 50 percent of their
operations in Wisconsin in the next year. To accomplish this goal, the state agency
or purchasing agent may purchase materials, supplies, equipment, and contractual
services from any such business that submits a bid or proposal that is no more than
5 percent higher than the apparent low bid or most advantageous proposal.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
- Fiscal Estimate From DHS
- Fiscal Estimate From DMA
- Fiscal Estimate From DNR
- Fiscal Estimate From DOA
- Fiscal Estimate From DOC
- Fiscal Estimate From DOR
- Fiscal Estimate From DOT
- Fiscal Estimate From DPI
- Fiscal Estimate From DSPS
- Fiscal Estimate From DVA
- Fiscal Estimate From DWD
- Fiscal Estimate From TOUR
- Fiscal Estimate From UWS
- Fiscal Estimate From WTCS
Sponsors
Full history
- Nov 22, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lassa, Holperin, Hansen, Wirch, C. Larson and Carpenter;Cosponsored by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Molepske Jr, Vruwink, Clark, Zepnick, C. Taylor, Danou, Wynn, Pocan, Hebl, Turner, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Fields, Roys, Sinicki, Mason and Ringhand
- Nov 22, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations
- Dec 2, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 2, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 2, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 2, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 2, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 7, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 9, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 13, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 15, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 21, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 21, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 21, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 27, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1