Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 321

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

limiting the number of individual income tax checkoffs and combining the breast cancer and prostate cancer checkoffs into a checkoff for cancer research.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, an individual income tax check-off procedure exists that

allows an individual who files a return to designate any amount of additional

payment or any amount of a refund due for the endangered resources program.

Similar checkoffs exist to provide payments to several other programs, including a

veterans trust fund, prostate cancer research, multiple sclerosis programs, a fire

fighters memorial, which is temporary and expires after $400,000 is designated, and

a breast cancer research program, and to provide a donation to a professional football

stadium district.

For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2011, taxpayers may not have

the opportunity to make such a designation to more than ten checkoffs, not including

temporary checkoffs, and no temporary checkoffs may be created after December 31,

2011. The bill also prohibits the Department of Revenue (DOR) from placing more

than ten checkoffs on the income tax form, and repeals the current law provision that

requires DOR to highlight certain checkoffs with a symbol. Other than a checkoff

created in a bill that is introduced in both houses of the legislature before June 1,

2011, if any checkoff is created after December 31, 2011, and before January 1, 2015,

it may not appear on the tax form, and no designations may be made to the checkoff,

before January 1, 2015.

Beginning in September 2014, and every two years thereafter, the bill requires

the secretary of revenue to rank the checkoffs in order of the amount of designations

received during the previous two-year period.

If more than 11 checkoffs exist, not including temporary checkoffs, only the top

eight checkoffs, in terms of designations received, may appear on the tax form for the

next two years, and the ninth and tenth places on the tax form will be taken by

checkoffs that haven't received any designations during the previous two-year

period. The new checkoffs that appear on the form will be the oldest checkoffs, based

on the date on which such a checkoff was added to a list of eligible checkoffs by DOR

and by the date on which a checkoff took effect.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Grothman (R) , Holperin (D)

3 cosponsors

Marklein (R) , Strachota (R) , Thiesfeldt (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Jan 25, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Feb 13, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 6, 2011 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Grothman and Holperin;Cosponsored by Representatives Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Marklein and Craig

  2. Dec 6, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue

  3. Dec 27, 2011 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 19, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 25, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 25, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. Jan 25, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 10, 2012 · Senate

    Representative Craig withdrawn as a cosponsor

  9. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-14-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  11. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  12. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 24, Noes 9

  16. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Strachota

  19. Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  21. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:03 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  22. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  24. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  29. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  30. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  31. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Assembly amendment 1 concurred in

  32. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  33. Mar 21, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-21-2012

  34. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  35. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 222

  36. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012