Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
limitations on the issuance of a certificate of title for a motor vehicle involved in certain operating while intoxicated offenses, technical changes that affect the period of revocation of a person's operating privilege, vehicle and insurance registration for motor carriers operating in multiple jurisdictions, and vehicle identification numbers assigned by the Department of Transportation (suggested as remedial legislation by the Department of Transportation).
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Prior to July 1, 2010, if a person was convicted of certain third or subsequent
operating-while-intoxicated-related (OWI-related) offenses, a court could have
ordered that the person's motor vehicle involved in the offense be seized and sold at
auction. Under current law, upon receipt of certain notices regarding the initiation
of certain OWI-related actions, the Department of Transportation (DOT) is
generally prohibited from issuing a certificate of title transferring ownership of a
motor vehicle owned by the person subject to the action and involved in the offense
until the responsible court issues an order permitting DOT to issue a certificate of
title. On July 1, 2010, the provisions permitting a court to order the seizure and sale
of a motor vehicle owned by a person convicted of a third or subsequent OWI-related
offense and involved in the offense were repealed. This bill repeals the provision
prohibiting DOT from issuing a certificate of title transferring a motor vehicle
formerly subject to potential seizure and sale.
Under current law, if a court orders revocation of a person's operating privilege
for certain offenses, the court must extend the revocation period by the number of
days to which the court sentences the person to imprisonment for a related offense.
A related offense under this provision is erroneously described as "an offense related
to the refusal." This bill corrects the erroneous reference to a refusal by substituting
the word "revocation."
Current law requires the DOT, subject to certain conditions, to implement the
International Registration Plan (IRP). The IRP is a registration reciprocity
agreement among various jurisdictions, including states and Canadian provinces,
providing for apportionment by these jurisdictions of the vehicle registration fees of
motor carriers operating in more than one jurisdiction.
Current law also authorizes DOT, with the approval of the governor, to enter
into reciprocal agreements with other jurisdictions as to licensing and taxes under
which motor vehicles, trailers, or semitrailers (vehicles) properly licensed or
registered in the other jurisdictions may be operated in interstate commerce in this
state, or vehicles properly licensed or registered in either jurisdiction may be
operated in intrastate commerce in either jurisdiction, if certain conditions are met.
These reciprocal agreements may apply with respect to vehicles that are not required
to be registered under the IRP. Under these agreements, DOT may accept
proportional registration of certain vehicle fleets if specified conditions are met,
including that this state will receive a fair share of registration fees, and may issue
prorate registration plates for these vehicles. Proportional registration involves
registration based on a motor carrier's operation in more than one jurisdiction and
the sharing of taxes and fees among jurisdictions in proportion to the total number
of miles traveled in each jurisdiction.
This bill eliminates DOT's authority to accept proportional registration, and to
issue prorate plates, under these reciprocal agreements.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Law Revision Committee
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 19, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 8, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Law Revision Committee
- Dec 8, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections
- Dec 28, 2011 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 12, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 19, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 19, 2012 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 19, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-14-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-12-2012
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012
- Apr 6, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 262
- Apr 10, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-19-2012