Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
participation in certain training by unemployment insurance claimants, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Currently, unemployment insurance (UI) benefits may not be denied to an
otherwise eligible individual because the individual is enrolled in a vocational
training course or a basic education course that is a prerequisite to such training
("approved training") under certain conditions. Current law also permits a claimant
who has exhausted all rights to benefits and is enrolled in an approved training
course that meets certain qualifications to potentially qualify to receive up to 26
weeks of additional benefits while enrolled in that training ("extended training"). A
claimant who is enrolled in approved or extended training is not subject to certain
benefit denials or reductions that would otherwise preclude the claimant from
claiming benefits while enrolled in approved or extended training.
This bill creates a pilot program of special occupational training that is not
approved training. The bill directs the Department of Workforce Development
(DWD) to designate three areas served by local workforce development boards in
which the program shall be offered. Under the bill, DWD must offer the program
throughout each designated area. Under the bill, the training consists of voluntary
six-week placements of UI claimants for 20 to 24 hours per week with employers who
elect to offer the training directly. A trainee may not be an employee of the employer
offering the training. The bill directs DWD to accept applications from employers
who wish to offer the training and to place claimants who wish to participate in
available openings. On the application, an employer must affirm that it currently
has one job opening for each training participant that it seeks in a position that a
successful participant would potentially qualify to fill. Under the bill, no claimant
may receive more than two placements during a benefit year (period during which
benefits are payable). In addition, no claimant may receive a placement for any week
beginning after the end of the first 26 weeks of the claimant's benefit year. The bill
provides that a claimant who receives special occupational training is not
disqualified from receiving UI benefits solely as a result of participating in the
training. The bill requires each claimant to maintain eligibility for UI benefits while
participating in the training. Under the bill, a claimant who participates in special
occupational training receives a stipend of $75 from DWD for each week in which the
claimant participates in the training. The bill appropriates general purpose revenue
to make the payments. The bill also provides that a claimant who is participating
in special occupational training is considered an employee of the state for purposes
of worker's compensation benefits and prohibits such a claimant from making a
claim or brining on action in tort against the employer that provided the special
occupational training. The program created by the bill does not apply after June 30,
2015.
The bill directs DWD to report to the legislature no later than December 31,
2014, concerning the effectiveness of the program and DWD's recommendations for
extension of the program or changes to the program to enhance its effectiveness.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Galloway (R) , Holperin (D) , Lassa (D) , Moulton (R) , Schultz (R) , Wanggaard (R)
27 cosponsors
A. Ott (R) , Bernier (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Carpenter (D) , Endsley (R) , Honadel (R) , Jacque (R) , Klenke (R) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Litjens (R) , Marklein (R) , Mursau (R) , Petersen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Petryk (R) , Sinicki (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Steineke (R) , Strachota (R) , Tauchen (R) , Toles (D) , Wynn (R) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 1, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 27, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Wanggaard, Galloway, Holperin, Lassa, Moulton and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Honadel, Kuglitsch, Petersen, Krug, Sinicki, Jacque, Bernier, Petrowski, Wynn, Knodl, Tauchen, Petryk, Litjens, Klenke, Mursau, Brooks, Steineke, A. Ott, Marklein, Spanbauer, Strachota, Staskunas, Toles, Bies, Zepnick and Endsley
- Dec 27, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs
- Jan 6, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 10, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 13, 2012 · Senate
Senator Carpenter added as a coauthor
- Jan 30, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard
- Feb 1, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 1, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 1, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 1, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1