Senate Bill 354
Registration and operation of all-terrain vehicles and utility terrain vehicles, granting rule-making authority, and making appropriations
Topics: Motor vehicle: Dealers and finance companies, Motor vehicle: Taxation or registration, Natural Resources, Department of: Recreation and boating, Recreation vehicle, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 28, 2011
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 21, 2012
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 90 to 4
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 208
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) regulates the operation of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). DNR also regulates utility terrain vehicles (UTVs), in consultation with the Department of Transportation, under a pilot program that expires on June 30, 2012.
UTV pilot program Under current law, a UTV is defined as a motor driven device, other than a golf cart or low-speed vehicle, that is designed to be used primarily off of a highway and that has, and was originally manufactured with, certain features, including a gross weight of more than 900 pounds but not more than 1,999 pounds, a cargo or dump box, four or more low-pressure tires, non-straddling seats for at least two occupants, and certain safety systems.
Read the full summary Show less
The UTV pilot program allows DNR, a federal agency, a county, or a municipality to designate an ATV route or trail within its respective jurisdiction for use by persons operating UTVs. The UTV pilot program provides that if a county adopts a resolution electing to participate in the pilot program, then the resolution applies to all of the municipalities within the county unless a municipality adopts a resolution to opt out of the program.
Under the UTV pilot program, no person may operate a UTV on a designated ATV route or trail unless DNR registers the UTV. The UTV pilot program authorizes DNR to register and charge registration fees for UTVs in the same manner as it registers and charges registration fees for ATVs that are registered for public use under current law. Under the UTV pilot program, certain laws that apply to ATVs also apply to UTVs, including traffic citation laws, rules of operation, prohibitions on operation while intoxicated, and certain equipment requirements. The UTV pilot program prohibits a person who is younger than 16 from operating a UTV and requires a person who is born on or after January 1, 1988, and who operates a UTV to hold a valid all-terrain vehicle safety certificate.
UTV operation and funding under the bill This bill eliminates the UTV pilot program and establishes a permanent method for regulating the use of UTVs on ATV routes and trails. As with the pilot program, the bill authorizes DNR and federal agencies, counties, and municipalities to designate ATV routes and trails that may be used by persons operating UTVs.
Under the bill, as under the pilot program, most of the laws that apply to the operation of ATVs also apply to the operation of UTVs. As under the UTV pilot program, the bill allows the operation of UTVs only on those ATV routes and trails that are specifically designated as open to UTV operation. The bill requires DNR to establish uniform signs and standards for the operation of UTVs on ATV routes and trails. The definition of a UTV under the bill is similar to the definition under the pilot program except that it also specifies that a vehicle does not qualify as a UTV if the vehicle would meet federal motor vehicle safety standards, or if it is a dune buggy, mini-truck, or tracked vehicle. The bill also provides that a vehicle that satisfies all requirements to meet the definition of an ATV qualifies instead as a UTV if the vehicle exceeds the weight limit under the ATV definition.
As under the UTV pilot program, the bill generally prohibits a person under the age of 16 from operating a UTV. The bill authorizes a person who is under 16 years of age to operate a UTV if the person operates the UTV for an agricultural purpose and the person is under the supervision of a person who is over 18 years of age. As under current law, as it applies to ATV operation, these age restrictions do not apply to a person who operates a UTV exclusively on land under the management and control of the person's immediate family.
Under current law, the ATV program administered by DNR is primarily funded by fees generated from ATV registrations and the sale of trail passes. Under this bill, the UTV program is also primarily funded by UTV registrations and the sale of trail passes, but the bill authorizes DNR to expend these funds primarily for projects to improve or maintain those ATV trails that may be used by operators of UTVs.
The ATV program under current law is also funded by an annual transfer from the transportation fund to the conservation fund of an amount equal to the estimated ATV gas tax payment. The amount of the estimated ATV gas tax payment is calculated for each fiscal year by multiplying the number of registered ATVs (except those registered only for private use) by 25 gallons and then multiplying this product by the excise tax imposed on gasoline and diesel fuel on the last day of February of the previous fiscal year. This bill requires a similar annual transfer from the transportation fund to the conservation fund. The amount of the transfer under the bill is equal to the estimated UTV gas tax payment. This amount is calculated in the same manner as the ATV gas tax payment is calculated except that it does not include, in that calculation, commercial UTV registrations.
Miscellaneous provisions This bill makes various other changes to the laws relating to ATVs. The changes include the following:
1. Current law does not require ATVs that are registered for public use to display a registration plate. This bill requires a person who owns an ATV or UTV that is registered for public use to furnish a plate on which the registration number is displayed. The bill also requires the person to affix a registration decal, furnished by DNR, to each side of the ATV or UTV.
2. The bill requires a person who registers an ATV or UTV for private use to affix a registration decal, furnished by DNR, to each side of the ATV or UTV. Current law does not require ATVs registered for private use to display registration decals.
3. Under current law, a manufacturer, dealer, distributor, or renter (commercial dealer) of ATVs must register with DNR and obtain a commercial ATV certificate. Upon registration, DNR issues three reflectorized plates to the commercial dealer and the dealer may allow the ATV to be operated only if a reflectorized plate is attached to the ATV. Under this bill, a commercial dealer of ATVs, UTVs, or both, must register with DNR and obtain a commercial ATV and UTV certificate. The bill requires a commercial dealer of ATVs or UTVs to display a plate or sign on the ATV or UTV but does not require DNR to supply reflectorized plates. Under the bill, DNR must issue registration decals upon registering a commercial dealer of ATVs or UTVs, and the commercial dealer may not allow the ATV or UTV to be operated without a decal affixed to the plate or sign furnished by the commercial dealer.
4. Under current law, with certain exceptions, a person who operates an ATV on a public ATV trail must obtain a nonresident trail pass from DNR and display the pass on the ATV. A person who registers an ATV is exempt from this requirement.
This bill requires that a nonresident trail pass issued to an operator of an ATV or UTV must be permanently affixed in a highly visible location on the forward half of the ATV or UTV.
5. A nonresident trail pass issued under current law expires on June 30 of each year. This bill changes the expiration date for these annual passes to March 31 and authorizes DNR to issue five-day nonresident trail passes.
6. A public-use registration certificate for an ATV under current law is valid for a two-year period. This bill specifies that a public-use registration certificate is valid for both an ATV and a UTV beginning on April 1 or the date of issuance or renewal and ending March 31 of the second year following the date of issuance or renewal.
7. This bill provides that registration and nonresident trail pass requirements do not apply to a person operating an ATV or UTV during the first full weekend in June of each year.
Who's behind it
7 senators are its . 4 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.
17 more lawmakers .
See all 24 names Hide the names
Authors (7)
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Joe Leibham · Republican, Senate
- Terry Moulton · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (17)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Endsley · Republican, Assembly
- Pam Galloway · Republican, Senate
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- John Nygren · Republican, Assembly
- Warren Petryk · Republican, Assembly
- Roger Rivard · Republican, Assembly
- Erik Severson · Republican, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Tauchen · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 5 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 9, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 20, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 90 to 4 · Feb 21, 2012 · 5 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican
Yes (90)
- Alvin Ott (R, 3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (D, 70)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Andy Jorgensen (D, 43)
- Barbara Toles (D, 17)
- Bill Kramer (R, 97)
- Bob Ziegelbauer (I, 25)
- Brett Hulsey (D, 78)
- Chad Weininger (R, 4)
- Chris Danou (D, 92)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Cory Mason (D, 66)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dan Meyer (R, 34)
- Daniel LeMahieu (R, 59)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Dean Knudson (R, 30)
- Don Pridemore (R, 22)
- Donna Seidel (D, 85)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Erik Severson (R, 28)
- Evan Wynn (R, 43)
- Fred Clark (D, 81)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Garey Bies (R, 1)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jason Fields (D, 11)
- Jeff Fitzgerald (R, 39)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeffrey Stone (R, 82)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Knilans (R, 44)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Klenke (R, 88)
- John Murtha (R, 29)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- Jon Richards (D, 19)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Karl Van Roy (R, 90)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Keith Ripp (R, 42)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Louis Molepske Jr. (D, 71)
- Margaret Krusick (D, 7)
- Mark Honadel (R, 21)
- Mark Pocan (D, 78)
- Mary Williams (R, 87)
- Michelle Litjens (R, 56)
- Mike Endsley (R, 26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Pat Strachota (R, 58)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (D, 57)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Richard Spanbauer (R, 53)
- Robert Turner (D, 61)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Roger Rivard (R, 75)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Sandy Pasch (D, 10)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Scott Suder (R, 69)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Steve Kestell (R, 27)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Thomas Larson (R, 67)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tony Staskunas (D, 15)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
No (4)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Mark Radcliffe (D, 92)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
Didn't vote (5)
- David Cullen (D, 13)
- Elizabeth Coggs (D, 10)
- John Steinbrink (D, 65)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Tamara Grigsby (D, 18)
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 90, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 63 to 31 · Feb 21, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 31”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 33 to 0 · Feb 21, 2012
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (33)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jessica King (D, 18)
- Jim Holperin (D, 12)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Pam Galloway (R, 29)
- Rich Zipperer (R, 33)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Spencer Coggs (D, 6)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 5, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 3, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 208.
-
Mar 30, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 21, 2012
The Assembly passed it too, 90 to 4.
-
Feb 21, 2012
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Feb 21, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 21, 2012
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 21, 2012
The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.
-
Feb 21, 2012
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 21, 2012
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Feb 21, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 20, 2012
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 20, 2012
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Feb 9, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 9, 2012
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 9, 2012
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 31, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 19, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 19, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 28, 2011
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Dec 28, 2011
Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.
-
Dec 28, 2011
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 28, 2011 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Leibham, Holperin, Harsdorf, Moulton, Hansen, Lassa and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Severson, Rivard, Endsley, Krug, Marklein, Nygren, A. Ott, Petryk, Spanbauer, Strachota, Tauchen, Tiffany, Tranel and Brooks
- Dec 28, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections
- Dec 28, 2011 · Senate
Senator Galloway added as a coauthor
- Jan 19, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 19, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 20, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Leibham
- Jan 31, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 2, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Leibham
- Feb 9, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 9, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 9, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 9, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 9, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Senator Vinehout added as a coauthor
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Mason and Richards
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 63, Noes 31
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Representative Mursau added as a cosponsor
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 90, Noes 4
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-12-2012
- Mar 30, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012
- Apr 3, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 208
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-16-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote