Senate Bill 378
Surplus lines insurance, insurance security fund, automobile insurance, and granting rule-making authority
Topics: Insurance: Agent, Insurance: Health, Insurance: Miscellaneous, Insurance: Motor vehicle, Interstate commerce
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 12, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 33 to 0
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 13, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 224
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Surplus lines insurance This bill makes a few changes related to surplus lines insurance, which is defined in the bill as insurance that is permitted to be placed through an agent or broker with an insurer that is not authorized to do an insurance business in this state and that covers an insured for which this state is the home state, which is defined in the bill as: 1) the state in which the insured maintains its principal place of business; 2) the insured's principal residence if the insured is an individual; or 3) if 100 percent of the insured risk is outside this state, the state to which the greatest percentage of the insured's taxable premium for the insurance is allocated.
Current law contains some limitations on and requirements for the placement of insurance with, and the direct procurement of insurance from, an insurer that is not authorized to do an insurance business in this state. The bill specifies that certain of these requirements do not apply if this state is not the insured's home state and the placement complies with the laws of the insured's home state. The bill also specifies that an intermediary may not place surplus lines insurance with an insurer that is not authorized to do an insurance business in this state unless certain criteria are satisfied. If the insurer is domiciled in another United States jurisdiction, the insurer must be authorized to write the type of insurance in its domiciliary jurisdiction that the intermediary is placing, the insurer must have a specified level of capital and surplus or the commissioner of insurance (commissioner) must find the insurer's capital and surplus acceptable, and the insurer must provide to the commissioner a certified copy of its current annual statement that is filed and approved by the regulatory authority in the insurer's domicile. If the insurer is domiciled outside the United States, the insurer must be on the list maintained by the international insurers department of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and must meet any additional requirements regarding the use of the list established by the commissioner by rule.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, the policyholder of surplus lines insurance generally must pay a 3 percent tax on gross premium. If a policy covers risks in more than one state including this state, the tax payable to this state is computed on the premium allocated to this state for the portion of the risk located in this state. Under the bill, that computation applies only for policies issued or renewed before July 21, 2011.
For policies issued or renewed on or after that date, the tax is payable to this state only if this state is the home state of the insured, and it is computed on the entire premium, including premium attributable to risks outside of this state.
The bill specifies that the licensing requirements for intermediaries in this state do not apply to a person who solely procures insurance that may be placed directly or through a broker with an insurer that is not authorized to do an insurance business in this state and that is not surplus lines insurance; that the requirements related to filing insurance forms with the commissioner for approval do not apply to a surplus lines insurance form, except for a form for rustproofing warranty insurance; and that the provision relating to insurance policies containing provisions for independent appraisal and compulsory arbitration, subject to the requirements for form filing and approval, does not apply to surplus lines insurance.
Auto insurance Under current law, the auto insurance provisions relating to required coverage and minimum limits apply to all liability insurance policies that insure with respect to any owned motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this state. The bill eliminates the condition that the requirements apply only if an owned motor vehicle is insured so that, unless a specific exemption applies, the coverage and minimum limit requirements apply to any policy that insures with respect to any motor vehicle.
The bill makes a few modifications to the auto insurance provisions that, under Act 14, go into effect on November 1, 2011. Act 14 provided a definition for a "commercial liability policy" as a policy that provides coverage for the insured's general liability arising out of business or commercial activities and that includes as one component coverage for the insured's liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle. Under Act 14, commercial liability policies are not subject to the requirement for motor vehicle insurance policies that they must include uninsured motorist coverage and medical payments coverage, unless the insured rejects medical payments coverage, or the requirement that an insurer must notify the insured of the availability of underinsured motorist coverage. The bill does all of the following:
1. Specifies that a commercial liability policy is not subject to these requirements if the coverage provided under the policy for the insured's liability arising out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle is limited to nonowned motor vehicles.
2. Provides that if a policy that is exempt from the requirements does, however, provide uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage or medical payments coverage, that coverage must have at least the limits that are required under the statutes for those coverages. (For uninsured motorist coverage, the minimum limits are $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident; for underinsured motorist coverage, the minimum limits are $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident; and for medical payments coverage, the minimum limit is $1,000 per person.)
3. Excludes commercial automobile liability policies from the definition of commercial liability policies so that commercial automobile liability policies are subject to the same requirements as motor vehicle insurance policies and defines a "commercial automobile liability policy" as a policy that is intended principally to provide primary coverage for the insured's liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle in the insured's business or other commercial activities.
4. Clarifies that only one named insured is required to reject medical payments coverage for the rejection to be effective.
Insurance security fund Under current law, the state maintains an insurance security fund to protect insured parties from excessive delay and loss in the event an insurer is liquidated and to provide for the continuation of protection under certain policies and contracts in the event of a liquidation of an insurer. Insurers, with some exceptions, are required to contribute moneys to the insurance security fund. Current law also specifies that, with some exceptions, the maximum obligation of the insurance security fund on any single risk, loss, or life is $300,000.
In addition to making other changes to the insurance security fund, this bill specifies that retained asset accounts are covered by the insurance security fund. A retained asset account is any mechanism in which the settlement of proceeds payable under a life insurance policy is accomplished by the insurer or an entity acting on behalf of the insurer depositing the proceeds into an account with check or draft writing privileges, where those proceeds are retained by the insurer under a written supplementary contract not involving annuity benefits. The bill specifies that a retained asset account is a type of supplementary contract for which an insured may make a claim for payment against the fund. The bill also specifies that retained asset accounts are eligible for continuation protections as are certain other policies and contracts. The bill defines, for the purposes of the maximum fund obligation, "disability insurance" as comprehensive health insurance and major medical health insurance. The bill clarifies that the maximum obligation applies regardless of the number of policies or contracts. The bill also sets the maximum aggregate liability of the fund for a single risk, loss, or life with respect to benefits for property insurance, liability insurance, and disability insurance at $500,000, while the maximum for other insurance policy or contract types remains at $300,000.
Who's behind it
Frank G. Lasee, a Republican, is its .
2 more lawmakers .
See all 3 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (2)
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing vote to recommend it
Passed, 6 to 0 · Feb 17, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 20, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 33 to 0 · Feb 21, 2012
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (33)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jessica King (D, 18)
- Jim Holperin (D, 12)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Pam Galloway (R, 29)
- Rich Zipperer (R, 33)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Spencer Coggs (D, 6)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 10, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 6, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 224.
-
Apr 5, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 29, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 22, 2012
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 21, 2012
The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.
-
Feb 20, 2012
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 20, 2012
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Feb 20, 2012
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Feb 17, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.
-
Feb 15, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 14, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 12, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing.
-
Jan 12, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 12, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Lasee;Cosponsored by Representative Petersen
- Jan 12, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 15, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Senator Taylor added as a coauthor
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
LRB correction
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:37 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 28, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-28-2012
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012
- Apr 6, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 224
- Apr 10, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-19-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote