Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 378

Surplus lines insurance, insurance security fund, automobile insurance, and granting rule-making authority

Topics: Insurance: Agent, Insurance: Health, Insurance: Miscellaneous, Insurance: Motor vehicle, Interstate commerce

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 12, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 13, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 224

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Surplus lines insurance This bill makes a few changes related to surplus lines insurance, which is defined in the bill as insurance that is permitted to be placed through an agent or broker with an insurer that is not authorized to do an insurance business in this state and that covers an insured for which this state is the home state, which is defined in the bill as: 1) the state in which the insured maintains its principal place of business; 2) the insured's principal residence if the insured is an individual; or 3) if 100 percent of the insured risk is outside this state, the state to which the greatest percentage of the insured's taxable premium for the insurance is allocated.

Current law contains some limitations on and requirements for the placement of insurance with, and the direct procurement of insurance from, an insurer that is not authorized to do an insurance business in this state. The bill specifies that certain of these requirements do not apply if this state is not the insured's home state and the placement complies with the laws of the insured's home state. The bill also specifies that an intermediary may not place surplus lines insurance with an insurer that is not authorized to do an insurance business in this state unless certain criteria are satisfied. If the insurer is domiciled in another United States jurisdiction, the insurer must be authorized to write the type of insurance in its domiciliary jurisdiction that the intermediary is placing, the insurer must have a specified level of capital and surplus or the commissioner of insurance (commissioner) must find the insurer's capital and surplus acceptable, and the insurer must provide to the commissioner a certified copy of its current annual statement that is filed and approved by the regulatory authority in the insurer's domicile. If the insurer is domiciled outside the United States, the insurer must be on the list maintained by the international insurers department of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and must meet any additional requirements regarding the use of the list established by the commissioner by rule.

Read the full summary

Under current law, the policyholder of surplus lines insurance generally must pay a 3 percent tax on gross premium. If a policy covers risks in more than one state including this state, the tax payable to this state is computed on the premium allocated to this state for the portion of the risk located in this state. Under the bill, that computation applies only for policies issued or renewed before July 21, 2011.

For policies issued or renewed on or after that date, the tax is payable to this state only if this state is the home state of the insured, and it is computed on the entire premium, including premium attributable to risks outside of this state.

The bill specifies that the licensing requirements for intermediaries in this state do not apply to a person who solely procures insurance that may be placed directly or through a broker with an insurer that is not authorized to do an insurance business in this state and that is not surplus lines insurance; that the requirements related to filing insurance forms with the commissioner for approval do not apply to a surplus lines insurance form, except for a form for rustproofing warranty insurance; and that the provision relating to insurance policies containing provisions for independent appraisal and compulsory arbitration, subject to the requirements for form filing and approval, does not apply to surplus lines insurance.

Auto insurance Under current law, the auto insurance provisions relating to required coverage and minimum limits apply to all liability insurance policies that insure with respect to any owned motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this state. The bill eliminates the condition that the requirements apply only if an owned motor vehicle is insured so that, unless a specific exemption applies, the coverage and minimum limit requirements apply to any policy that insures with respect to any motor vehicle.

The bill makes a few modifications to the auto insurance provisions that, under Act 14, go into effect on November 1, 2011. Act 14 provided a definition for a "commercial liability policy" as a policy that provides coverage for the insured's general liability arising out of business or commercial activities and that includes as one component coverage for the insured's liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle. Under Act 14, commercial liability policies are not subject to the requirement for motor vehicle insurance policies that they must include uninsured motorist coverage and medical payments coverage, unless the insured rejects medical payments coverage, or the requirement that an insurer must notify the insured of the availability of underinsured motorist coverage. The bill does all of the following:

1. Specifies that a commercial liability policy is not subject to these requirements if the coverage provided under the policy for the insured's liability arising out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle is limited to nonowned motor vehicles.

2. Provides that if a policy that is exempt from the requirements does, however, provide uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage or medical payments coverage, that coverage must have at least the limits that are required under the statutes for those coverages. (For uninsured motorist coverage, the minimum limits are $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident; for underinsured motorist coverage, the minimum limits are $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident; and for medical payments coverage, the minimum limit is $1,000 per person.)

3. Excludes commercial automobile liability policies from the definition of commercial liability policies so that commercial automobile liability policies are subject to the same requirements as motor vehicle insurance policies and defines a "commercial automobile liability policy" as a policy that is intended principally to provide primary coverage for the insured's liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle in the insured's business or other commercial activities.

4. Clarifies that only one named insured is required to reject medical payments coverage for the rejection to be effective.

Insurance security fund Under current law, the state maintains an insurance security fund to protect insured parties from excessive delay and loss in the event an insurer is liquidated and to provide for the continuation of protection under certain policies and contracts in the event of a liquidation of an insurer. Insurers, with some exceptions, are required to contribute moneys to the insurance security fund. Current law also specifies that, with some exceptions, the maximum obligation of the insurance security fund on any single risk, loss, or life is $300,000.

In addition to making other changes to the insurance security fund, this bill specifies that retained asset accounts are covered by the insurance security fund. A retained asset account is any mechanism in which the settlement of proceeds payable under a life insurance policy is accomplished by the insurer or an entity acting on behalf of the insurer depositing the proceeds into an account with check or draft writing privileges, where those proceeds are retained by the insurer under a written supplementary contract not involving annuity benefits. The bill specifies that a retained asset account is a type of supplementary contract for which an insured may make a claim for payment against the fund. The bill also specifies that retained asset accounts are eligible for continuation protections as are certain other policies and contracts. The bill defines, for the purposes of the maximum fund obligation, "disability insurance" as comprehensive health insurance and major medical health insurance. The bill clarifies that the maximum obligation applies regardless of the number of policies or contracts. The bill also sets the maximum aggregate liability of the fund for a single risk, loss, or life with respect to benefits for property insurance, liability insurance, and disability insurance at $500,000, while the maximum for other insurance policy or contract types remains at $300,000.

Who's behind it

Frank G. Lasee, a Republican, is its ⁠.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 3 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 0 · Feb 17, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 20, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Feb 21, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 224.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 29, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 22, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 21, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  8. Feb 20, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  9. Feb 20, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  10. Feb 20, 2012

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  11. Feb 17, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.

  12. Feb 15, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Feb 14, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Jan 12, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing.

  15. Jan 12, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 12, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Lasee;Cosponsored by Representative Petersen

  2. Jan 12, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing

  3. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  6. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Taylor added as a coauthor

  8. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    LRB correction

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  20. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:37 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  21. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 28, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-28-2012

  28. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  29. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 224

  30. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote