Senate Bill 391
The procedure for the administrative dissolution of corporations
Topics: Business, Corporation, Data processing, Financial Institutions, Department of, Interstate commerce, Newspaper and magazine
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 19, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 14, 2012
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 16, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 234
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a corporation may voluntarily dissolve by filing articles of dissolution with the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI). DFI also has authority to initiate the involuntary dissolution of a corporation, based on specified grounds, by bringing a proceeding to administratively dissolve the corporation. If DFI commences such a dissolution proceeding, DFI must give the corporation written notice, addressed to the registered office of the corporation, of its determination that one or more grounds exist to dissolve the corporation, after which the corporation has 60 days to correct each ground for dissolution or demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of DFI that each ground does not exist. If the corporation fails to do so, DFI must administratively dissolve the corporation. DFI must enter a notation in its records to reflect each ground for dissolution and the effective date of dissolution and must give the corporation written notice of those facts, addressed to the registered office of the corporation. If either of these notices from DFI is returned to DFI as undeliverable, DFI must again give notice to the corporation, this time addressed to the principal office of the corporation. If this follow-up notice is returned to DFI as undeliverable or if the corporation's principal office cannot be determined from DFI's records, DFI must give the notice by publishing a "class 2" notice (two insertions) in the official state newspaper.
Under this bill, if DFI's follow-up notice is returned to DFI as undeliverable or if the corporation's principal office cannot be determined from DFI's records, instead of giving the notice by publishing a "class 2" notice in the official state newspaper, DFI must give the notice by posting it on DFI's Web site. For two years, DFI must also publish a monthly "class 1" notice in the official state newspaper informing the public that these administrative dissolution notices are posted on DFI's Web site.
Who's behind it
Glenn Grothman, a Republican, is its .
1 more lawmaker .
See all 2 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (1)
- Bill Kramer · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 8, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 10, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 6, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 234.
-
Apr 5, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 16, 2012
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 14, 2012
“Read first time and referred to calendar of 2-16-2012” (the official wording)
-
Feb 14, 2012
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 14, 2012
The Senate passed it.
-
Feb 14, 2012
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 8, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 6, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 25, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 19, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues.
-
Jan 19, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 19, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Grothman;Cosponsored by Representative Kramer
- Jan 19, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues
- Jan 25, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 6, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 8, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 8, 2012 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues
- Feb 8, 2012 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues
- Feb 8, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 8, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-14-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to calendar of 2-16-2012
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-12-2012
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012
- Apr 6, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 234
- Apr 10, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-19-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote