Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 391

The procedure for the administrative dissolution of corporations

Topics: Business, Corporation, Data processing, Financial Institutions, Department of, Interstate commerce, Newspaper and magazine

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 19, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 14, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 234

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a corporation may voluntarily dissolve by filing articles of dissolution with the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI). DFI also has authority to initiate the involuntary dissolution of a corporation, based on specified grounds, by bringing a proceeding to administratively dissolve the corporation. If DFI commences such a dissolution proceeding, DFI must give the corporation written notice, addressed to the registered office of the corporation, of its determination that one or more grounds exist to dissolve the corporation, after which the corporation has 60 days to correct each ground for dissolution or demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of DFI that each ground does not exist. If the corporation fails to do so, DFI must administratively dissolve the corporation. DFI must enter a notation in its records to reflect each ground for dissolution and the effective date of dissolution and must give the corporation written notice of those facts, addressed to the registered office of the corporation. If either of these notices from DFI is returned to DFI as undeliverable, DFI must again give notice to the corporation, this time addressed to the principal office of the corporation. If this follow-up notice is returned to DFI as undeliverable or if the corporation's principal office cannot be determined from DFI's records, DFI must give the notice by publishing a "class 2" notice (two insertions) in the official state newspaper.

Under this bill, if DFI's follow-up notice is returned to DFI as undeliverable or if the corporation's principal office cannot be determined from DFI's records, instead of giving the notice by publishing a "class 2" notice in the official state newspaper, DFI must give the notice by posting it on DFI's Web site. For two years, DFI must also publish a monthly "class 1" notice in the official state newspaper informing the public that these administrative dissolution notices are posted on DFI's Web site.

Who's behind it

Glenn Grothman, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 8, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 234.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 16, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 14, 2012

    “Read first time and referred to calendar of 2-16-2012” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 14, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 14, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Feb 14, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Feb 8, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Feb 6, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Jan 25, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Jan 19, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues.

  13. Jan 19, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 19, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Grothman;Cosponsored by Representative Kramer

  2. Jan 19, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues

  3. Jan 25, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 6, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues

  7. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues

  8. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-14-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  13. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  14. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to calendar of 2-16-2012

  20. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  21. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-12-2012

  28. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  29. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 234

  30. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote