Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 396

Financial assistance for the livestock premises registration program, a tax credit for livestock identification tags and tag-reading equipment, and making an appropriation

Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Franchise: Taxation, Income tax: Credit, Livestock and meat, Radio

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 13, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 20, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 50 to 41

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 278

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 16, 2012: “Published 4-26-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Livestock premises registration Current law generally requires a person who keeps livestock at a location in this state to register the location with the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP). The law authorizes DATCP to create exemptions from the registration requirement by rule. Current law also authorizes DATCP to contract with an agent to administer the livestock premises registration program.

Under this bill, if DATCP contracts with an agent to administer the livestock premises registration program, DATCP must annually provide a grant to the agent for administering the program. The amount of the grant is equal to the amount raised by the agent from private sources for administering the livestock premises registration program, up to the amount appropriated for the grant.

Read the full summary

Livestock identification tag tax credit The bill creates an income and franchise tax credit for 25 percent of the amount that a taxpayer paid in the taxable year for radio frequency identification tags for the taxpayer's livestock located in this state and 25 percent of the amount that a taxpayer paid in the taxable year for equipment used in this state to read radio frequency identification tags on livestock. If the amount of the credit exceeds a taxpayer's tax liability, the taxpayer does not receive a refund, but, instead, may carry forward the amount of any unused credit to subsequent taxable years.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Republican.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 4 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 31, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 5, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 29 to 4 · Mar 6, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 29, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 50 to 41 · Mar 15, 2012 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (50)

No (41)

Didn't vote (6)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 50, Noes 41, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 57 to 36 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 16, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 13, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 278.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 50 to 41.

  5. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 29 to 4.

  8. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Mar 5, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  10. Mar 5, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  11. Feb 7, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Feb 3, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Jan 31, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  14. Jan 30, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Jan 23, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Jan 20, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education.

  17. Jan 20, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 20, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Harsdorf and Vinehout;Cosponsored by Representatives Tauchen and Steinbrink

  2. Jan 20, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education

  3. Jan 23, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 30, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 31, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 31, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Jan 31, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Feb 7, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Feb 27, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Harsdorf

  11. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators King, C. Larson, Vinehout, Holperin, Taylor, Shilling, T. Cullen, S. Coggs, Wirch, Miller, Lassa, Hansen and Erpenbach

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  18. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  20. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 29, Noes 4

  21. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  23. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  24. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr, Vruwink, Jorgensen, Danou and Clark

  25. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:17 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  26. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  27. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 36

  28. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  30. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 50, Noes 41, Paired 2

  31. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  33. Mar 22, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-22-2012

  34. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  35. Apr 13, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-12-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 278

  36. Apr 16, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-26-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote