Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 407

Zinc air button cell batteries and providing penalties

Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Forfeiture, Industrial development, Public safety, Sales

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 27, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 87 to 6

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 201

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law imposes restrictions on the following batteries:

1. No person may sell or offer for sale an alkaline manganese button cell battery manufactured after January 1, 1996, unless the manufacturer has certified to the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) that the battery contains no more than 25 milligrams of mercury.

Read the full summary

2. No person may sell or offer for sale any other alkaline manganese battery manufactured after January 1, 1996, or any zinc carbon battery manufactured after July 1, 1994, unless the manufacturer has certified to DATCP that the battery contains no mercury that was intentionally introduced.

3. Except for a mercuric oxide button cell battery, no person may sell or offer for sale a mercuric oxide battery unless the manufacturer informs purchasers of a recycling or disposal site for the battery.

This bill creates a new restriction for a "zinc air button cell battery," which the bill defines as a battery that resembles a button in size and shape and that has a zinc anode, an alkaline electrolyte, and cathode that is capable of catalyzing oxygen when present. The bill prohibits a person from selling or offering for sale at retail a zinc air button cell battery manufactured after January 1, 2013, unless the manufacturer certifies to DATCP that the battery has no mercury that was intentionally introduced. The bill requires DATCP to compile and make available to the public a list of zinc air button cell batteries for which it receives such a certification. Under current law, DATCP has the same duty regarding certifications it receives for alkaline manganese and zinc carbon batteries. A person who sells a zinc air button cell battery at retail in violation of the bill is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $50 nor more than $200 and a manufacturer who submits a fraudulent certification is subject to a forfeiture of not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000. The same forfeitures apply to the restrictions under current law described above.

Who's behind it

8 senators are its ⁠. 5 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

16 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (16)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Workforce Development vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 5, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Small Business, and Tourism, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 87 to 6 · Mar 15, 2012 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (87)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 87, Noes 6”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 5, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 3, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 201.

  3. Mar 30, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 87 to 6.

  5. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Mar 5, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  9. Feb 22, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Feb 8, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Jan 27, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Workforce Development, Small Business, and Tourism.

  12. Jan 27, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 27, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Olsen, Erpenbach, Hansen, Holperin, Risser, Schultz, Taylor and Wanggaard;Cosponsored by Representatives Tranel, Bernard Schaber, Brooks, Krug, Litjens, A. Ott, J. Ott, Petryk, Pocan, Ripp, Rivard, Spanbauer, Suder, C. Taylor, Thiesfeldt and Williams

  2. Jan 27, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Workforce Development, Small Business, and Tourism

  3. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Small Business, and Tourism, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:20 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  17. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 87, Noes 6

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  23. Mar 21, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-21-2012

  24. Mar 30, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012

  25. Apr 3, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 201

  26. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-16-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote