Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 409

Various changes to the worker's compensation law, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation

Topics: Occupational safety, Studies, Worker's compensation, Workforce Development, Department of

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 30, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 94 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 183

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes to the worker's compensation law, as administered by the Department of Workforce Development (DWD).

Payment of benefits Maximum weekly compensation for permanent partial disability.

Read the full summary

Under current law, permanent partial disability benefits are subject to maximum weekly compensation rates specified by statute. Currently, the maximum weekly compensation rate for permanent partial disability is $302. This bill increases that maximum weekly compensation rate to $312 for injuries occurring before January 1, 2013, and to $322 for injuries occurring on or after that date.

Vocational rehabilitation.

Under current law, an injured employee is entitled to receive compensation for temporary disability while the employee is receiving vocational rehabilitation services under the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973. If, however, the injury causes only partial disability, the employee's weekly indemnity is the proportion of the weekly indemnity rate for total disability that the actual wage loss of the injured employee bears to the injured employee's average weekly wage at the time of injury.

This bill provides that compensation for temporary disability on account of receiving vocational rehabilitation services shall not be reduced on account of any wages earned for the first 24 hours worked by an employee during a week in which the employee is receiving those services, but that if an employee performs more than 24 hours of work during a week in which the employee is receiving those services, all wages earned for hours worked in excess of 24 during that week shall be offset against the employee's average weekly wage in calculating compensation for temporary disability. This provision, however, does not apply after the last day of the 24th month beginning after publication of the bill.

Under current law, an injured employee who is receiving vocational rehabilitation services is entitled to payment for the expense of travel to receive those services and, if the employee receives those services elsewhere than his or her place of residence, payment for the expense of maintenance during his or her rehabilitation.

This bill provides that an injured employee who is receiving vocational rehabilitation services is entitled to payment for the cost of tuition, fees, and books required for the employee's vocational rehabilitation program.

Disfigurement benefits.

Under current law, DWD may allow compensation for a permanent disfigurement that occasions potential wage loss, except that if an employee who claims compensation for permanent disfigurement returns to work for his or her employer at the time of the injury at the same or a higher wage, DWD may not allow that compensation unless the employee shows that he or she probably has lost or will lose wages due to the disfigurement.

This bill prohibits DWD from allowing compensation for permanent disfigurement for an employee who returns to work for his or her employer at the time of injury, or who is offered employment with that employer , unless the employee suffers an actual wage loss due to the disfigurement.

Work injury supplemental benefit fund Introduction.

This bill makes various changes relating to the work injury supplemental benefit (WISB) fund administered by DWD with the assistance of the Department of Justice (DOJ), which is a fund that is used to pay supplemental worker's compensation to employees with permanent total disability, additional death benefits to the children of a deceased employee, additional worker's compensation to an employee with permanent partial disability who incurs further permanent disability, and worker's compensation when an otherwise meritorious claim for occupational disease is barred by the statute of limitations, when the status or existence of the employer or worker's compensation insurer (insurer) cannot be determined, or when there is otherwise no adequate remedy.

Traumatic injuries.

Under current law, an application for worker's compensation that is not filed within 12 years from the date of the injury or from the date that worker's compensation, other than for treatment or burial expenses, was last paid, whichever is later, is barred by the statute of limitations, except that in cases of occupational disease or in cases of traumatic injury resulting in the loss or total impairment of a hand or any part of the rest of the arm proximal to, that is, toward the trunk from, the hand or of a foot or any part of the rest of the leg proximal to the foot, any loss of vision, any permanent brain injury, or any injury causing the need for an artificial spinal disc or a total or partial knee or hip replacement (traumatic injury) there is no statute of limitations. In cases in which there is no statute of limitations, benefits or treatment expenses for occupational disease becoming due 12 years after the date of injury or after the date that compensation was last paid, whichever is later, are paid by DWD from the WISB fund and benefits or treatment expenses for traumatic injury becoming due 12 years after the date are paid by the employer or insurer.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court recently held, however, in Society Insurance v.

LIRC , 2010 WI 68, 326 Wis. 2d 444, that retroactive application, that is, application to injuries occurring before April 1, 2006, of the provision holding employers or insurers liable for benefits or treatment expenses for a traumatic injury becoming due 12 years after the date of injury or after the date that compensation was last paid, whichever is later, constitutes an unconstitutional impairment of contract and violation of due process rights. Accordingly, this bill provides that the WISB fund, rather than the employer or insurer, is liable for such benefits or treatment expenses only if the date of injury or last payment of compensation, other than for treatment or burial expenses, whichever is later, is before April 1, 2006.

Third-party liability.

Under current law, worker's compensation is the exclusive remedy for an employee who is injured while performing services growing out of and incidental to his or her employment, except that, subject to certain exceptions, an injured employee may claim worker's compensation from his or her employer and bring an action in tort against a third party for damages by reason of the injury. Current law also permits an employer or insurer that has paid or is obligated to pay worker's compensation for an injury to bring an action in tort against a third party and permits DWD to bring such an action, if DWD has paid or is obligated to pay a claim for an injury from the uninsured employer's fund. When a third party is found liable for damages by reason of an injury, the employer, insurer, or, if applicable, the uninsured employers fund is entitled to reimbursement from the proceeds collected from the third party for any worker's compensation paid to the injured employee.

This bill permits DWD to bring an action in tort against a third party for damages by reason of an injury for which DWD has paid or is obligated to pay a claim from the WISB fund and entitles the WISB fund to reimbursement from the proceeds collected from the third party for any payments made to an injured employee from that fund.

Reimbursement of supplemental benefits.

Under current law, an injured employee who is receiving worker's compensation for permanent total disability or continuous temporary total disability resulting from an injury that occurred before January 1, 2001, is entitled to receive supplemental benefits that in the first instance are payable by the employer or insurer. The employer or insurer then is entitled to reimbursement from the WISB fund for the supplemental benefits paid. This bill requires an employer or insurer that has paid supplemental benefits to file a claim for reimbursement with DWD by no later than 12 months after the end of the year in which the supplemental benefits were paid in order to receive reimbursement from the WISB fund for the supplemental benefits paid.

Second injury.

Under current law, if an employee who has permanent partial disability that would entitle the employee to 200 weeks of worker's compensation incurs further permanent disability that entitles the employee to 200 weeks of worker's compensation as a result of a second injury, the employee is entitled to additional compensation from the WISB fund after the end of the period for which compensation for permanent disability as a result of the second injury is payable by the employer or insurer. That additional compensation is equivalent to the amount that would be payable for the previous disability or the amount that is payable for the further disability resulting from the second injury, whichever is less.

This bill permits an employee with such permanent partial disability who incurs such further disability as a result of a second injury to receive that additional compensation from the WISB fund only if the employee has not already received compensation from the WISB fund as a result of a second injury.

Surcharges.

Current law requires employers that are subject to the worker's compensation law to keep records of all accidents causing death or disability of an employee while performing services growing out of and incidental to the employee's employment, requires insurers and self-insured employers to keep records of all payments made under the worker's compensation law, and requires reports based on those records to be furnished to DWD at the times and in the manner as DWD may require by rule or general order. An employer or insurer that fails to keep those records or to make those reports is subject to a surcharge of not less than $10 nor more than $100 for each offense, which must be deposited in the WISB fund.

Current law provides that such a surcharge is due within 90 days after the date on which notice of the surcharge is mailed to the employer or insurer. This bill provides that such a surcharge is due within 30 days after that date.

Claims processing.

Under current law, DOJ is required to defend claims against the WISB fund. This bill permits DWD to retain the Department of Administration (DOA) to process, investigate, and pay claims for payments from the WISB fund. If retained by DWD, DOA may compromise a claim that it processes, subject to review by DWD.

Adequacy of fund balance.

Finally, with respect to the WISB fund, the bill provides that if the secretary of workforce development determines that the expected ultimate losses to the WISB fund on known claims exceed 85 percent of the cash balance in that fund and that there is a reasonable likelihood that the cash balance in that fund may become inadequate to fund all claims against the fund, the secretary must file with the secretary of administration a certificate attesting that the cash balance in that fund is likely to become inadequate to fund those claims and specifying: 1) that payment of those claims will be made as provided in a schedule that DWD must promulgate by rule; 2) a date after which payment of those claims will be reduced; or 3) a date after which no new claims will be paid.

Hearings and procedures Final practitioner's report.

Under current law, if an injured employee has a period of temporary disability of more than three weeks or a permanent disability or has undergone surgery to treat an injury, other than surgery to correct a hernia, the employer or insurer must submit to DWD a final treating practitioner's report.

This bill also requires that report to be submitted when an injured employer sustains an eye injury requiring medical treatment on three or more occasions off the employer's premises. The bill, however, prohibits DWD from requiring submission of that report when the employer or insurer denies the employee's claim for compensation and the employee does not contest that denial.

Program administration Health service fee disputes.

Under current law, if a health service provider, injured employee, insurer, or employer submits to DWD a dispute over the reasonableness of a health service fee charged by the health service provider for services provided to the injured employee, DWD must determine the reasonableness of the disputed fee by comparing the disputed fee to the mean fee for the procedure for which the disputed fee was charged, as shown by data from a database certified by DWD. If the disputed fee is at or below the mean fee, plus 1.4 standard deviations from that mean, DWD must determine that the disputed fee is reasonable and order the fee to be paid. If the disputed fee is above the mean fee, plus 1.4 standard deviations from that mean, DWD must determine that the disputed fee is unreasonable and order that a reasonable fee be paid, unless the health service provider proves that a higher fee is justified. This bill lowers the standard deviations used to determine the reasonableness of a disputed health service fee to 1.2 standard deviations from the mean.

The bill also requires DWD to conduct an audit of the databases certified by the DWD. If the audit is not commenced by the first day of the seventh month beginning after the effective date of the bill: 1) the maximum weekly compensation rate for permanent partial disability is lowered from $322 to $317 for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013; and 2) the standard deviation used to determine the reasonableness of a disputed health service fee is increased from 1.2 standard deviations from the mean to 1.3 standard deviations from the mean beginning on January 1, 2013.

Study of funding for permanent total disability increases.

Under current law, the amount of the weekly indemnity for permanent total disability that is payable to an injured employee is determined as of the date of injury. An injured employee who is receiving compensation for permanent total disability resulting from an injury that occurred before January 1, 2001, however, is also entitled to receive certain supplemental benefits from the employer or insurer or, in certain cases, from the WISB fund.

Who's behind it

Van Wanggaard, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 17, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 20, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Feb 21, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 94 to 0 · Mar 15, 2012 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (94)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 94, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 5, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 3, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 183.

  3. Mar 30, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 94 to 0.

  5. Feb 29, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 22, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 21, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  8. Feb 20, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  9. Feb 20, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  10. Feb 17, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  11. Feb 8, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Feb 3, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Feb 1, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jan 30, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs.

  15. Jan 30, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 30, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Wanggaard;Cosponsored by Representative Ballweg

  2. Jan 30, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs

  3. Feb 1, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 12:01 P.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  20. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 94, Noes 0

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-23-2012

  27. Mar 30, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012

  28. Apr 3, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 183

  29. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-16-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote