Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 416

Adopting amendments to the Uniform Commercial Code Article 9, relating to secured transactions, recommended by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws

Topics: Commercial code, Debt and debtors, Uniform legislation

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 31, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 14, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 206

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

In 2001 Wisconsin Act 10 , this state adopted the Revised Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 9-Secured Transactions, which was approved by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) in 1998, with amendments approved by NCCUSL in 1999 and 2000. UCC Article 9 governs transactions that involve the granting of credit secured by personal property of a debtor. The creditor's interest is called a "security interest." UCC Article 9 regulates the creation and enforcement of security interests in movable property, intangible property, and fixtures (items of personal property affixed to real property), but not in real property. Under UCC Article 9, if a debtor defaults, the creditor may repossess and sell the property (generally called collateral) to satisfy the debt. A creditor with a "perfected" security interest usually has "priority" in the distribution of the debtor's assets as compared to creditors with later-acquired security interests (junior secured creditors) and unsecured creditors. Before or at the time a security interest is perfected, it must "attach." Attachment arises when the security interest becomes effective between the creditor and the debtor and usually occurs when their security agreement becomes effective. Perfection of a security interest establishes the creditor's priority in relation to other creditors of the debtor in the same collateral and usually occurs with the filing by the creditor of a "financing statement" in a central filing office - in Wisconsin, the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI).

(The only local filing of financing statements, in the local real estate records, is for security interests in fixtures or in certain land-related collateral such as timber.)

Read the full summary

However, filing a financing statement is not the only method for perfection, depending upon the kind of property that is collateral. Possession of collateral by the secured party is an alternative method of perfection for many kinds of collateral, and "control" is the method of perfection for certain kinds of collateral.

This bill adopts the 2010 amendments to UCC Article 9 approved by NCCUSL.

Among the changes to UCC Article 9 are the following:

1. The bill makes modifications with respect to how a debtor's name must be identified on a financing statement. Most significantly, if the debtor is an individual to whom the Department of Transportation (DOT) has issued an operator's license or identification card that has not expired, the financing statement, to be sufficient, must provide the name of the individual as it appears on the operator's license or identification card. If the debtor is an individual who does not hold an unexpired DOT-issued operator's license or identification card, the financing statement must provide the individual name of the debtor or the surname and first personal name of the debtor. The bill also makes changes as to how the debtor's name must appear on a financing statement whenever collateral is held in a trust and also requires certain additional information on the financing statement if collateral is held in a trust or is being administered by a personal representative. The bill makes other minor modifications or clarifications relating to how debtor names must appear on financing statements.

2. Under current law, the law of the jurisdiction (state) where a debtor is located, while the debtor is located there, governs perfection of a security interest, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and the priority of a security interest in collateral. If the debtor moves to a new state or collateral is transferred to a new debtor in a new state after a security interest is perfected, the security interest remains perfected until the earliest of the following, as applicable: the time perfection would have ceased under the law of the original state; the expiration of four months after the change of the debtor's location to the new state; or the expiration of one year after the transfer of collateral to a person that becomes a debtor and is located in the new state. If the security interest becomes perfected under the law of the new state before any of these time periods elapse, the security interest remains perfected; otherwise, the security interest becomes unperfected and is deemed never to have been perfected as against a purchaser of the collateral for value.

The bill includes provisions applicable to the filing of a financing statement when the debtor has changed location to a new state and a security interest attaches within four months after this change of location. The bill specifies circumstances in which a financing statement filed before the change of location under the law of the original state is effective to perfect a security interest and specifies when the security interest remains perfected under the law of the new state. The bill also includes provisions applicable if a financing statement naming an original debtor is filed under the law of the original state where the debtor was located and a new debtor is located in a new state. The bill specifies circumstances in which a financing statement is effective to perfect a security interest in collateral acquired by the new debtor before, and within four months after, the new debtor becomes bound by the security agreement and specifies when the security interest remains perfected under the law of the new state.

3. Under current law, among the reasons a filing office (usually DFI) may refuse filing of an initial financing statement or certain amendments is that, if the debtor is an organization, the financing statement or amendment does not provide a type of organization for the debtor, a jurisdiction of organization for the debtor, or an organizational identification number for the debtor or indicate that the debtor has no such number. This bill eliminates these omissions as reasons for refusing to file an initial financing statement or amendment to a financing statement.

4. Under current law, if a person believes that a filed record indexed under the person's name is inaccurate or was wrongfully filed, the person may file a correction statement. This bill changes the term from "correction statement" to "information statement." The bill also specifies that a secured party of record may file an information statement, containing certain information, relating to a filed record if the secured party believes that the person that filed the record was not entitled to file it.

5. Under current law, certain agreement terms involving account debtors (persons obligated on an account, chattel paper, or general intangible) or in promissory notes relating to the debtor's consent to certain matters affecting a security interest are ineffective except with respect to the sale of a promissory note or payment intangible. This bill narrows this exception so that it does not apply if the sale is a disposition of collateral after default or is an acceptance of collateral in satisfaction of the debtor's obligation.

6. The bill makes changes relating to a secured party's control of electronic chattel paper by specifying that, for a secured party to have control, a system employed for evidencing the transfer of interests in the chattel paper must reliably establish the secured party as the person to which the chattel paper was assigned.

7. The bill includes several definitional changes, including changes to improve compatibility of provisions with the use of electronic records. The bill also creates a new term and definition of "public organic record" for public records relating to entity formation or organization.

8. The bill makes various minor and technical changes to UCC Article 9 and replaces current UCC forms with updated UCC forms that incorporate the changes in Article 9. The bill also includes transitional provisions relating to the applicability of the bill's changes to existing security interests.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. 2 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (8)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 8, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 5, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 3, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 206.

  3. Mar 30, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 16, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 16, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 16, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 14, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Feb 14, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Feb 8, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Feb 1, 2012 to Feb 2, 2012

    1 more representative and 1 senator signed on in support.

  11. Feb 1, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Jan 31, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues.

  13. Jan 31, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 31, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Grothman, Taylor and Risser;Cosponsored by Representatives Ballweg, Petersen, Marklein, Spanbauer, A. Ott and Bernier

  2. Jan 31, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues

  3. Feb 1, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 1, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Lasee added as a coauthor

  5. Feb 2, 2012 · Senate

    Representative LeMahieu added as a cosponsor

  6. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues

  8. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-14-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  13. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  20. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Mar 29, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-29-2012

  27. Mar 30, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012

  28. Apr 3, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 206

  29. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-16-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote