Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 417

Concealment of benefit claim information, availability for work, interest on delinquent payments, and the composition and authority of appeal tribunals under the unemployment insurance law

Topics: Attorney, Employment, Fines, Interest, International relations, Unemployment insurance, Workforce Development, Department of

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 31, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 21, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 15, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 236

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes changes in concealment of benefit claim information, the requirement to maintain availability for work, interest on delinquent payments, and the composition and authority of appeal tribunals under the unemployment insurance (UI) law.

Concealment of benefit claim information Currently, if a claimant conceals any material fact relating to his or her eligibility for UI benefits or conceals any wages earned in or paid or payable for a given week, the claimant is subject to graduated monetary penalties that increase in severity with the number of determinations of concealment by the claimant. In addition, if a claimant conceals any wages for a given week, the claimant is ineligible to receive any benefits for that week.

Read the full summary

This bill provides instead that claimant who is found guilty of concealment is subject to a penalty equal to 15 percent of the benefit payments erroneously paid to the claimant as a result of any acts of concealment. Under the bill, revenues collected from the penalties are deposited in the unemployment reserve fund, which is used to pay benefits.

Availability for work Currently, with certain exceptions, a claimant is eligible for UI benefits for any week in which the claimant earns no wages only if the claimant is available for work during that week. This bill provides specifically that a claimant is not considered to be available for work in any week in which he or she is in a country other than the United States or Canada for more than 48 hours unless the claimant has authorization to work in that other country and there is a reciprocal agreement concerning the payment of benefits between that other country and the United States.

Interest on delinquent payments Currently, if an employer does not make a payment required under the UI law to the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) by the due date, the employer must pay interest on the amount owed equal to one percent per month or fraction thereof from the date that the payment became due. This bill changes the interest rate on delinquent payments to that monthly rate that annualized is equal to 9 percent or to 2 percent more than the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal as of September 30 of the preceding year, whichever is greater, for each month or fraction thereof that the employer is delinquent.

Composition and authority of appeal tribunals Currently, DWD is directed by law to appoint appeal tribunals to administratively hear and decide disputed UI claims and other matters arising under the UI law. An individual who is appointed to serve as an appeal tribunal must be a permanent employee of DWD except that DWD may appoint a person to serve as a temporary appeal tribunal if the individual was formerly appointed to serve as a tribunal while employed by DWD and retired from state service as a permanent employee. This bill permits DWD to appoint any attorney who is licensed to practice in this state to serve as a temporary appeal tribunal. The bill also provides that the actions of appeal tribunals must be consistent with applicable state and federal law.

Who's behind it

Van Wanggaard, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Labor vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 17, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 20, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Feb 21, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 92 to 0 · Mar 15, 2012 · 7 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (92)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 92, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 236.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 92 to 0.

  5. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Mar 14, 2012

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  7. Mar 14, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  8. Feb 29, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Feb 22, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  10. Feb 21, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  11. Feb 21, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  12. Feb 20, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  13. Feb 20, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  14. Feb 17, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  15. Feb 8, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Feb 1, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Jan 31, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs.

  18. Jan 31, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 31, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Wanggaard;Cosponsored by Representative Ballweg

  2. Jan 31, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs

  3. Feb 1, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0 by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs

  7. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 12:02 P.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  21. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  22. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  24. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Assembly amendment 1 concurred in

  25. Mar 14, 2012 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  27. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Ballweg

  28. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  29. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  31. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 92, Noes 0

  32. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-19-2012

  34. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  35. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 236

  36. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote