Senate Bill 421
Authorizing medically related actions by physician assistants
Topics: Medical Examining Board, Nurses, Physician
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 30, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 2, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 21, 2012
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 13, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 161
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 30, 2012: “Published 4-11-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Medical Examining Board grants physician assistant licenses to individuals who meet training and examination requirements and any other requirements established in rules promulgated by the Medical Examining Board.
The following provisions under current law authorize physicians or other health care professionals to act under specified circumstances and to affect individuals by these authorized actions:
Read the full summary Show less
1. Unless medically contraindicated as documented by a nursing home or community-based residential facility resident's physician in the resident's medical record, the resident has the right to private and unrestricted communications with his or her family, physician, attorney, and others; to share a room with his or her spouse or domestic partner if the spouse or domestic partner is also a resident; to participate in activities of social, religious, and community groups; and to be free from chemical and physical restraints.
2. Home health services that are provided to an individual by a home health agency must be those specified under a plan for furnishing the services that is established and periodically reviewed by a physician.
3. For hearings before the local board of review concerning assessments of property taxes, an ill or disabled person who presents to the board a letter from a physician or osteopath confirming the illness or disability may present testimony by telephone.
4. Under laws relating to confidentiality of patient health care records, a physician who treats a patient whose physical or mental condition, in the physician's judgment, affects his or her ability to exercise reasonable and ordinary control over a motor vehicle may, without the patient's informed consent, report the patient's name and other information to the Department of Transportation. Physicians are exempted from civil liability for reporting, or not reporting, this information in good faith.
5. Under laws relating to communicable diseases:
a. The Department of Health Services (DHS) may order an individual who has a confirmed diagnosis of infectious tuberculosis or symptoms indicative of tuberculosis confined to a facility if several conditions are met, including notifying a court of the confinement and providing to the court a physician's written statement affirming the tuberculosis or symptoms.
b. If a court orders confinement of an individual with infectious tuberculosis or symptoms indicative of tuberculosis, the individual must remain confined until DHS or a local health officer, with the concurrence of a treating physician, determines that treatment is complete or that the individual is no longer a public health threat.
c. If, following a request by an officer of DHS or a local health officer, a person reasonably suspected of being infected with a sexually transmitted disease refuses or neglects examination by a physician or treatment, the DHS officer or local health officer may have the person committed to an institution for examination, treatment, or observation.
d. If a person with a sexually transmitted disease ceases or refuses treatment before reaching what is in a physician's opinion the noncommunicable stage, the physician must notify DHS and the person may be committed by a court for examination or treatment.
e. If a physician has reported to DHS a case of sexually transmitted disease, information regarding the disease and its treatment is not privileged before a court.
f. The State Laboratory of Hygiene must examine specimens for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted disease for any physician or local health officer and must report positive results to the local health officer and DHS.
g. If a local health officer or DHS officer requires it, a person who is employed in the handling of food products or is suspected of having a disease in a form that is communicable by food handling must submit to an examination by the officer or by a physician.
6. Under occupational regulation laws relating to physical therapists, a physical therapist may practice only on the written referral of a physician, chiropractor, dentist, or podiatrist, except under certain conditions, including providing services to an individual for a previously diagnosed medical condition after informing the individual's physician, chiropractor, dentist, or podiatrist.
7. Under occupational regulation laws relating to podiatrists, a podiatrist who renders chargeable services to, among others, a patient or physician, must render a statement of the charge directly to the person served.
8. Under laws relating to the practice of pharmacy, current law does the following:
a. Defines the term "practice of pharmacy" to include making therapeutic alternate drug selections in accordance with written guidelines or procedures approved by a hospital and by a physician for his or her patients for a hospital stay.
b. Provides that information communicated to a physician in an effort unlawfully to procure a prescription drug is not privileged communication.
c. Requires the enforcement of prescription drug laws that apply to physicians to be the responsibility of the Department of Regulation and Licensing and the Medical Examining Board.
d. Exempts pharmacists from requirements that they provide certain information when dispensing a drug product equivalent, if the patient is in a hospital and the drug product equivalent is dispensed in accordance with guidelines approved by, among others, the patient's physician.
Currently, an advanced practice nurse prescriber may act in the same manner physicians may act in the instances specified above.
This bill expands the current laws described above that authorize physicians to act under specified circumstances and to affect individuals by these authorized actions, by similarly authorizing individuals licensed as physician assistants.
Who's behind it
5 senators are its . 4 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
13 more lawmakers .
See all 18 names Hide the names
Authors (5)
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Scott L. Fitzgerald · Republican, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
- Jennifer Shilling · Democrat, Senate
- Leah Vukmir · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (13)
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- John Nygren · Republican, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Warren Petryk · Republican, Assembly
- Mark Radcliffe · Democrat, Assembly
- Janis Ringhand · Democrat, Senate
- Roger Rivard · Republican, Assembly
- Erik Severson · Republican, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Jim Steineke · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Larson · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Health vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 17, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 30, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Mar 30, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 161.
-
Mar 27, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 29, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 22, 2012
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 21, 2012
The Senate passed it.
-
Feb 21, 2012
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 17, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 17, 2012
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 15, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 13, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 9, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 2, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health.
-
Feb 2, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 2, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Vukmir, S. Fitzgerald, Olsen, Schultz and Shilling;Cosponsored by Representatives Petryk, Ringhand, T. Larson, Nygren, Pasch, Radcliffe, Rivard, Severson, Steineke, Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Brooks and Spanbauer
- Feb 2, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health
- Feb 9, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Vukmir
- Feb 15, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 12:03 P.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 26, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2012
- Mar 27, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-27-2012
- Mar 30, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-28-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 161
- Mar 30, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-11-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote