Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 421

Authorizing medically related actions by physician assistants

Topics: Medical Examining Board, Nurses, Physician

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 30, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 2, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 21, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 13, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 161

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 30, 2012: “Published 4-11-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Medical Examining Board grants physician assistant licenses to individuals who meet training and examination requirements and any other requirements established in rules promulgated by the Medical Examining Board.

The following provisions under current law authorize physicians or other health care professionals to act under specified circumstances and to affect individuals by these authorized actions:

Read the full summary

1. Unless medically contraindicated as documented by a nursing home or community-based residential facility resident's physician in the resident's medical record, the resident has the right to private and unrestricted communications with his or her family, physician, attorney, and others; to share a room with his or her spouse or domestic partner if the spouse or domestic partner is also a resident; to participate in activities of social, religious, and community groups; and to be free from chemical and physical restraints.

2. Home health services that are provided to an individual by a home health agency must be those specified under a plan for furnishing the services that is established and periodically reviewed by a physician.

3. For hearings before the local board of review concerning assessments of property taxes, an ill or disabled person who presents to the board a letter from a physician or osteopath confirming the illness or disability may present testimony by telephone.

4. Under laws relating to confidentiality of patient health care records, a physician who treats a patient whose physical or mental condition, in the physician's judgment, affects his or her ability to exercise reasonable and ordinary control over a motor vehicle may, without the patient's informed consent, report the patient's name and other information to the Department of Transportation. Physicians are exempted from civil liability for reporting, or not reporting, this information in good faith.

5. Under laws relating to communicable diseases:

a. The Department of Health Services (DHS) may order an individual who has a confirmed diagnosis of infectious tuberculosis or symptoms indicative of tuberculosis confined to a facility if several conditions are met, including notifying a court of the confinement and providing to the court a physician's written statement affirming the tuberculosis or symptoms.

b. If a court orders confinement of an individual with infectious tuberculosis or symptoms indicative of tuberculosis, the individual must remain confined until DHS or a local health officer, with the concurrence of a treating physician, determines that treatment is complete or that the individual is no longer a public health threat.

c. If, following a request by an officer of DHS or a local health officer, a person reasonably suspected of being infected with a sexually transmitted disease refuses or neglects examination by a physician or treatment, the DHS officer or local health officer may have the person committed to an institution for examination, treatment, or observation.

d. If a person with a sexually transmitted disease ceases or refuses treatment before reaching what is in a physician's opinion the noncommunicable stage, the physician must notify DHS and the person may be committed by a court for examination or treatment.

e. If a physician has reported to DHS a case of sexually transmitted disease, information regarding the disease and its treatment is not privileged before a court.

f. The State Laboratory of Hygiene must examine specimens for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted disease for any physician or local health officer and must report positive results to the local health officer and DHS.

g. If a local health officer or DHS officer requires it, a person who is employed in the handling of food products or is suspected of having a disease in a form that is communicable by food handling must submit to an examination by the officer or by a physician.

6. Under occupational regulation laws relating to physical therapists, a physical therapist may practice only on the written referral of a physician, chiropractor, dentist, or podiatrist, except under certain conditions, including providing services to an individual for a previously diagnosed medical condition after informing the individual's physician, chiropractor, dentist, or podiatrist.

7. Under occupational regulation laws relating to podiatrists, a podiatrist who renders chargeable services to, among others, a patient or physician, must render a statement of the charge directly to the person served.

8. Under laws relating to the practice of pharmacy, current law does the following:

a. Defines the term "practice of pharmacy" to include making therapeutic alternate drug selections in accordance with written guidelines or procedures approved by a hospital and by a physician for his or her patients for a hospital stay.

b. Provides that information communicated to a physician in an effort unlawfully to procure a prescription drug is not privileged communication.

c. Requires the enforcement of prescription drug laws that apply to physicians to be the responsibility of the Department of Regulation and Licensing and the Medical Examining Board.

d. Exempts pharmacists from requirements that they provide certain information when dispensing a drug product equivalent, if the patient is in a hospital and the drug product equivalent is dispensed in accordance with guidelines approved by, among others, the patient's physician.

Currently, an advanced practice nurse prescriber may act in the same manner physicians may act in the instances specified above.

This bill expands the current laws described above that authorize physicians to act under specified circumstances and to affect individuals by these authorized actions, by similarly authorizing individuals licensed as physician assistants.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

13 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 18 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (13)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Health vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 17, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 30, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 30, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 161.

  3. Mar 27, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Feb 29, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 22, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 21, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Feb 21, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Feb 17, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Feb 17, 2012

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Feb 15, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Feb 13, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Feb 9, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Feb 2, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health.

  15. Feb 2, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 2, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Vukmir, S. Fitzgerald, Olsen, Schultz and Shilling;Cosponsored by Representatives Petryk, Ringhand, T. Larson, Nygren, Pasch, Radcliffe, Rivard, Severson, Steineke, Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Brooks and Spanbauer

  2. Feb 2, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health

  3. Feb 9, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Vukmir

  6. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  21. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 12:03 P.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  22. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  28. Mar 26, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2012

  29. Mar 27, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-27-2012

  30. Mar 30, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-28-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 161

  31. Mar 30, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-11-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote