Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 422

The length of vehicles that may be operated on a highway and granting rule-making authority

Topics: Bus and truck: Taxation or registration, Metropolitan transportation, Road, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 3, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 21, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 72 to 22

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 243

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person may not operate on a highway any combination of two vehicles (vehicle combination) with an overall length in excess of 65 feet unless a specific exception applies or the person has a permit to exceed these lengths.

This bill increases the generally applicable overall length limit for vehicle combinations from 65 feet to 70 feet. However, the Department of Transportation (DOT) may, by rule, establish exceptions to this general length limit with respect to specific types of vehicles or designated highways. Under the bill, motor bus-trailer combinations owned and operated by, and for the exclusive use of, nonprofit organizations are subject to the general length limit of 70 feet, an increase from their length limit of 58 feet under current law.

Read the full summary

Under current law, there is an exception to the general length limit that allows for the operation of tractor-semitrailer combinations with an overall length not exceeding 75 feet on the state trunk highway system except those parts designated by DOT by rule as ineligible for this length limit or as long truck routes for which there is no length limit. In addition, there is an exception to the general single vehicle length limit that allows for the operation of a semitrailer as part of a vehicle combination if the semitrailer does not exceed 53 feet, its kingpin-to-axle length does not exceed 43 feet, and it is operated on the state trunk highway system except those parts designated by DOT by rule as ineligible for this length limit.

Under this bill, this 75 feet length limit exception for tractor-semitrailer combinations, and this 53 feet length limit exception for certain semitrailers, apply on all highways, not just state trunk highways, subject to the same exceptions for designated ineligible highways or long truck routes that apply under current law.

Under current law, the overall length limit for combinations of two or three vehicles operated or transported by the drive-away method in saddlemount combination is 65 feet. The term "saddlemount combination" is neither defined nor described by statute, but DOT defines it by rule as a combination of vehicles in which a truck or truck tractor tows one or more trucks or truck tractors, each connected by a saddle to the vehicle in front of it; the towed vehicles essentially piggyback the power unit or one another. Also under current law, DOT and local authorities may issue permits for combinations of two or three vehicles operated or transported by the drive-away method in saddlemount combination with an overall length not exceeding 65 feet.

This bill increases, from 65 feet to 75 feet, the length limit for combinations of two or three vehicles operated or transported by the drive-away method in saddlemount combination. In addition, the bill eliminates provisions of current law related to the issuance of permits for these vehicle combinations.

The bill also increases, from 65 feet to 66 feet, the vehicle length limit for articulated buses operated in urban areas.

Who's behind it

3 lawmakers are its ⁠. 2 are Republicans. 1 has no party on record.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 5 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 0 · Feb 16, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 60 to 34 · Feb 21, 2012 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (60)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 60, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 34 · Feb 21, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 72 to 22 · Mar 15, 2012 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (72)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 22”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 243.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 72 to 22.

  5. Feb 21, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 21, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Feb 20, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Feb 16, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 0.

  10. Feb 9, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Feb 3, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.

  12. Feb 3, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lazich and Lasee, by request of The Department of Transportation;Cosponsored by Representatives Petrowski and Bies

  2. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  3. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Harsdorf

  4. Feb 9, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 0

  7. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  18. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  19. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Barca, Jorgensen, Pasch and Mason

  20. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34

  21. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 60, Noes 34

  23. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 12:04 P.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  27. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 22

  28. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  30. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-23-2012

  31. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  32. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 243

  33. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote