Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 422

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

the length of vehicles that may be operated on a highway and granting rule-making authority.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a person may not operate on a highway any combination of

two vehicles (vehicle combination) with an overall length in excess of 65 feet unless

a specific exception applies or the person has a permit to exceed these lengths.

This bill increases the generally applicable overall length limit for vehicle

combinations from 65 feet to 70 feet. However, the Department of Transportation

(DOT) may, by rule, establish exceptions to this general length limit with respect to

specific types of vehicles or designated highways. Under the bill, motor bus-trailer

combinations owned and operated by, and for the exclusive use of, nonprofit

organizations are subject to the general length limit of 70 feet, an increase from their

length limit of 58 feet under current law.

Under current law, there is an exception to the general length limit that allows

for the operation of tractor-semitrailer combinations with an overall length not

exceeding 75 feet on the state trunk highway system except those parts designated

by DOT by rule as ineligible for this length limit or as long truck routes for which

there is no length limit. In addition, there is an exception to the general single vehicle

length limit that allows for the operation of a semitrailer as part of a vehicle

combination if the semitrailer does not exceed 53 feet, its kingpin-to-axle length

does not exceed 43 feet, and it is operated on the state trunk highway system except

those parts designated by DOT by rule as ineligible for this length limit.

Under this bill, this 75 feet length limit exception for tractor-semitrailer

combinations, and this 53 feet length limit exception for certain semitrailers, apply

on all highways, not just state trunk highways, subject to the same exceptions for

designated ineligible highways or long truck routes that apply under current law.

Under current law, the overall length limit for combinations of two or three

vehicles operated or transported by the drive-away method in saddlemount

combination is 65 feet. The term "saddlemount combination" is neither defined nor

described by statute, but DOT defines it by rule as a combination of vehicles in which

a truck or truck tractor tows one or more trucks or truck tractors, each connected by

a saddle to the vehicle in front of it; the towed vehicles essentially piggyback the

power unit or one another. Also under current law, DOT and local authorities may

issue permits for combinations of two or three vehicles operated or transported by

the drive-away method in saddlemount combination with an overall length not

exceeding 65 feet.

This bill increases, from 65 feet to 75 feet, the length limit for combinations of

two or three vehicles operated or transported by the drive-away method in

saddlemount combination. In addition, the bill eliminates provisions of current law

related to the issuance of permits for these vehicle combinations.

The bill also increases, from 65 feet to 66 feet, the vehicle length limit for

articulated buses operated in urban areas.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Lasee (R) , Lazich (R) , by request of The Department of Transportation

2 cosponsors

Bies (R) , Petrowski (R)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 0

Passed 4–0 Feb 16, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 60, Noes 34

Passed 60–34 Feb 21, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 60

Assembly: Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34

Passed 60–34 Feb 21, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 22

Passed 72–22 Mar 15, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 72

Full history

  1. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lazich and Lasee, by request of The Department of Transportation;Cosponsored by Representatives Petrowski and Bies

  2. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  3. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Harsdorf

  4. Feb 9, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 0

  7. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Barca, Jorgensen, Pasch and Mason

  19. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34

  20. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 60, Noes 34

  22. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 12:04 P.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  27. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 72, Noes 22

  28. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  30. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-23-2012

  31. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  32. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 243

  33. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012