Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 425

Loans and repayment assistance by a political subdivision for energy and water improvements to premises and collection of the debt by special charge

Topics: Energy conservation, Lien, Municipality: Finance, Real property, Water supply

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 22, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 3, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 21, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 91 to 2

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 138

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Published 4-4-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a city, village, or town may impose a special charge against real property for services rendered by allocating the cost of the service to the properties that are served. Generally, a special charge is not payable in installments.

Also under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may make a loan to, or enter into a loan repayment agreement with, an owner or lessee of a premises for making or installing certain energy or water efficiency improvements (property assessed clean energy or PACE program). The political subdivision may collect a loan repayment under the PACE program as a special charge. A special charge imposed under the PACE program may be collected in installments.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, a political subdivision that imposes a special charge under the PACE program and allows the charge to be paid in installments may allow a third party that has provided financing for the PACE program project to collect the installments. Also under this bill, a delinquent PACE program special charge installment becomes a lien on the property that benefits from the PACE program project. Also under this bill, if the political subdivision funds a PACE program project that costs $250,000 or more, the political subdivision must require the owner of the premises to obtain a written guarantee from the contractor or project engineer that the PACE program project will achieve a savings-to-investment ratio greater than 1.0 or that the contractor or engineer will pay the owner any shortfall in savings. For a PACE program project that costs less than $250,000, a political subdivision may require a third party technical review of the projected savings before making a PACE program loan or agreement.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. 2 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Energy vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Energy, Biotechnology, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 91 to 2 · Mar 13, 2012 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (91)

No (2)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 91, Noes 2, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 22, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 138.

  3. Mar 20, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 13, 2012 to Mar 15, 2012

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  5. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 91 to 2.

  6. Feb 29, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Feb 22, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Feb 21, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  9. Feb 15, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Feb 8, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Feb 7, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Feb 3, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Energy, Biotechnology, and Consumer Protection.

  13. Feb 3, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Cowles, Holperin and Wanggaard;Cosponsored by Representatives Weininger, T. Larson, Spanbauer, Tauchen and Molepske Jr

  2. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Energy, Biotechnology, and Consumer Protection

  3. Feb 7, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Energy, Biotechnology, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  10. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  16. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:22 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  21. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 91, Noes 2, Paired 2

  22. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Representative Mason added as a cosponsor

  23. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Senate

    Representative Zepnick added as a cosponsor

  26. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-20-2012

  27. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012

  28. Mar 22, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 138

  29. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-4-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote