Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 425

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

loans and repayment assistance by a political subdivision for energy and water improvements to premises and collection of the debt by special charge.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a city, village, or town may impose a special charge against

real property for services rendered by allocating the cost of the service to the

properties that are served. Generally, a special charge is not payable in installments.

Also under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may

make a loan to, or enter into a loan repayment agreement with, an owner or lessee

of a premises for making or installing certain energy or water efficiency

improvements (property assessed clean energy or PACE program). The political

subdivision may collect a loan repayment under the PACE program as a special

charge. A special charge imposed under the PACE program may be collected in

installments.

Under this bill, a political subdivision that imposes a special charge under the

PACE program and allows the charge to be paid in installments may allow a third

party that has provided financing for the PACE program project to collect the

installments. Also under this bill, a delinquent PACE program special charge

installment becomes a lien on the property that benefits from the PACE program

project. Also under this bill, if the political subdivision funds a PACE program

project that costs $250,000 or more, the political subdivision must require the owner

of the premises to obtain a written guarantee from the contractor or project engineer

that the PACE program project will achieve a savings-to-investment ratio greater

than 1.0 or that the contractor or engineer will pay the owner any shortfall in

savings. For a PACE program project that costs less than $250,000, a political

subdivision may require a third party technical review of the projected savings before

making a PACE program loan or agreement.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Cowles (R) , Holperin (D) , Wanggaard (R)

7 cosponsors

Mason (D) , Molepske Jr (D) , Spanbauer (R) , T. Larson (R) , Tauchen (R) , Weininger (R) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Energy, Biotechnology, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Feb 15, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 91, Noes 2, Paired 2

Passed 91–2 Mar 13, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 91

Nay · 2

Not voting · 4

Full history

  1. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Cowles, Holperin and Wanggaard;Cosponsored by Representatives Weininger, T. Larson, Spanbauer, Tauchen and Molepske Jr

  2. Feb 3, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Energy, Biotechnology, and Consumer Protection

  3. Feb 7, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 8, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Energy, Biotechnology, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  10. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  11. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  12. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  16. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:22 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  21. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 91, Noes 2, Paired 2

  22. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Representative Mason added as a cosponsor

  23. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Senate

    Representative Zepnick added as a cosponsor

  26. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-20-2012

  27. Mar 20, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012

  28. Mar 22, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 138

  29. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-4-2012