Senate Bill 427
School bullying, unlawful use of computer systems, and providing a penalty
Topics: Data processing: Criminal acts and law enforcement, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Obscenity, Public Instruction, Department of, School: Board, School: Discipline
Stopped before the full Senate voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 6, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law requires the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) to develop a model school policy on bullying by pupils and requires each school board to adopt a policy prohibiting bullying. A school board may adopt DPI's model policy. The model policy must include certain elements. For example, it must define bullying; identify the property owned, leased, or used by the school district on which the policy applies;
and require that school district officials and employees report incidents of bullying.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill requires that the definition of bullying in DPI's model policy include bullying by electronic means. The bill also requires that the model policy include requirements that a school board maintain records on bullying incidents and the discipline imposed on pupils for bullying, annually prepare a report that includes trends in bullying behavior and recommendations on how to reduce the number of bullying incidents, and post the report on the school district's Web site. Finally, the bill requires the model policy to include appropriate responses to bullying that occurs off school grounds in certain circumstances.
Current law prohibits a person from sending an e-mail message to another person if that message threatens to harm any person or property and if the sender intends to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse, or harass any person. A person who violates the prohibition is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor and is subject to a maximum fine of $1,000 or imprisonment of not more than 90 days, or both. This bill prohibits a person from posting an electronic message where others can view it if that message threatens to harm any person or property and if the person who posts it intends to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse, or harass another person. A person who violates this new prohibition is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor.
Current law also prohibits a person from sending an e-mail message to another person if that message uses any obscene, lewd, or profane language or suggests any lewd or lascivious act and if the sender intends to harass, annoy, or offend another person. A person who violates the prohibition is subject to a forfeiture of up to $1,000.
This bill prohibits a person from posting an electronic message where others can view it if that message uses any obscene, lewd, or profane language or suggests any lewd or lascivious act and if the sender intends to harass, annoy, or offend another person.
A person who violates this new prohibition is subject to a forfeiture of up to $1,000.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.
Who's behind it
10 senators are its . 8 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.
9 more lawmakers .
See all 19 names Hide the names
Authors (10)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Neal Kedzie · Republican, Senate
- Jessica King · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
- Timothy Cullen · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (9)
- Chris Taylor · Democrat, Assembly
- Joe Knilans · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Loudenbeck · Republican, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Pocan · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Janis Ringhand · Democrat, Senate
- Tony Staskunas · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Education vote on an amendment
Passed, 6 to 0 · Mar 8, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 8, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.
-
Mar 8, 2012
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 8, 2012
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 28, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 6, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.
-
Feb 6, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 6, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators T. Cullen, S. Coggs, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Taylor, King, Schultz, Risser, Holperin and Kedzie;Cosponsored by Representatives Knilans, C. Taylor, Pocan, Turner, Staskunas, Ringhand, Loudenbeck, Pasch and Pope-Roberts
- Feb 6, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- Feb 24, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator T. Cullen
- Feb 28, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator T. Cullen
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote