Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 427

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

school bullying, unlawful use of computer systems, and providing a penalty.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law requires the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) to develop a

model school policy on bullying by pupils and requires each school board to adopt a

policy prohibiting bullying. A school board may adopt DPI's model policy. The model

policy must include certain elements. For example, it must define bullying; identify

the property owned, leased, or used by the school district on which the policy applies;

and require that school district officials and employees report incidents of bullying.

This bill requires that the definition of bullying in DPI's model policy include

bullying by electronic means. The bill also requires that the model policy include

requirements that a school board maintain records on bullying incidents and the

discipline imposed on pupils for bullying, annually prepare a report that includes

trends in bullying behavior and recommendations on how to reduce the number of

bullying incidents, and post the report on the school district's Web site. Finally, the

bill requires the model policy to include appropriate responses to bullying that occurs

off school grounds in certain circumstances.

Current law prohibits a person from sending an e-mail message to another

person if that message threatens to harm any person or property and if the sender

intends to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse, or harass any person. A person who

violates the prohibition is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor and is subject to a

maximum fine of $1,000 or imprisonment of not more than 90 days, or both. This bill

prohibits a person from posting an electronic message where others can view it if that

message threatens to harm any person or property and if the person who posts it

intends to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse, or harass another person. A person

who violates this new prohibition is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor.

Current law also prohibits a person from sending an e-mail message to another

person if that message uses any obscene, lewd, or profane language or suggests any

lewd or lascivious act and if the sender intends to harass, annoy, or offend another

person. A person who violates the prohibition is subject to a forfeiture of up to $1,000.

This bill prohibits a person from posting an electronic message where others can view

it if that message uses any obscene, lewd, or profane language or suggests any lewd

or lascivious act and if the sender intends to harass, annoy, or offend another person.

A person who violates this new prohibition is subject to a forfeiture of up to $1,000.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,

the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a

report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to

result if the bill is enacted.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Holperin (D) , Kedzie (R) , King (D) , Risser (D) , S. Coggs (D) , Schultz (R) , T. Cullen (D) , Taylor (D)

9 cosponsors

C. Taylor (D) , Knilans (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Pasch (D) , Pocan (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Ringhand (D) , Staskunas (D) , Turner (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0

Passed 6–0 Mar 8, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 6, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators T. Cullen, S. Coggs, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Taylor, King, Schultz, Risser, Holperin and Kedzie;Cosponsored by Representatives Knilans, C. Taylor, Pocan, Turner, Staskunas, Ringhand, Loudenbeck, Pasch and Pope-Roberts

  2. Feb 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Feb 24, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator T. Cullen

  4. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator T. Cullen

  6. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  8. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  9. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  10. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1