Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
increasing the allowable number of project plan amendments, and lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made, for Tax Incremental District Number 3 in the city of Middleton.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a
TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several
steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the
proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local
planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed
project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's
proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the
overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or
village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID.
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or
village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing
costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the
allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23
years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year
in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally
make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended
termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the
expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.
Generally under current law a local planning commission may amend the
project plan of a TID, by adding or subtracting territory from the district, not more
than four times during the TID's existence.
Under this bill, with regard to TID number 3 in the city of Middleton, the local
planning commission may amend the project plan of the TID not more than seven
times, expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 32 years after the TID
was created, and DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 37 years after the TID's
creation.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 6, Noes 1
Passed 6–1 Feb 17, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 20, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 31, Noes 2
Passed 31–2 Feb 21, 2012 official source full pageAye · 31
- Alberta Darling (8)
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dale Schultz (17)
- Dave Hansen (30)
- Frank G. Lasee (1)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Glenn Grothman (20)
- Jessica King (18)
- Jim Holperin (12)
- Joe Leibham (9)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Julie M. Lassa (24)
- Leah Vukmir (5)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Mary Lazich (28)
- Michael Ellis (19)
- Neal Kedzie (11)
- Pam Galloway (29)
- Rich Zipperer (33)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Robert Jauch (25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (10)
- Spencer Coggs (6)
- Terry Moulton (23)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
- Timothy Cullen (15)
- Van Wanggaard (21)
Nay · 2
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Kathleen Vinehout (31)
Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 56, Noes 35
Passed 56–35 Mar 15, 2012 official source full pageAye · 56
- Alvin Ott (3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (31)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (70)
- André Jacque (1)
- Bill Kramer (97)
- Chad Weininger (4)
- Chris Kapenga (33)
- Dale Kooyenga (5)
- Dan Knodl (24)
- Dan Meyer (34)
- Daniel LeMahieu (59)
- David Craig (28)
- Dean Kaufert (53)
- Don Pridemore (22)
- Duey Stroebel (20)
- Edward Brooks (50)
- Evan Wynn (43)
- Garey Bies (1)
- Gary Tauchen (6)
- Howard Marklein (17)
- Jeff Fitzgerald (39)
- Jeff Mursau (36)
- Jeffrey Stone (82)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (52)
- Jerry Petrowski (29)
- Jim Ott (23)
- Jim Steineke (5)
- Joan Ballweg (14)
- Joe Knilans (44)
- Joel Kleefisch (38)
- John Klenke (88)
- John Nygren (89)
- Karl Van Roy (90)
- Kathleen Bernier (23)
- Keith Ripp (42)
- Kelda Roys (26)
- Kevin Petersen (57)
- Lee Nerison (96)
- Mark Honadel (21)
- Mary Williams (87)
- Michelle Litjens (56)
- Mike Endsley (26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (84)
- Pat Strachota (58)
- Paul F. Farrow (33)
- Robin Vos (33)
- Roger Rivard (75)
- Samantha Kerkman (61)
- Scott Krug (72)
- Scott Suder (69)
- Steve Kestell (27)
- Steve Nass (11)
- Thomas Larson (67)
- Travis Tranel (49)
- Tyler August (31)
- Warren Petryk (93)
Nay · 35
- Andy Jorgensen (43)
- Barbara Toles (17)
- Bob Ziegelbauer (25)
- Brett Hulsey (78)
- Chris Danou (92)
- Chris Taylor (76)
- Christine Sinicki (20)
- Cory Mason (66)
- David Cullen (13)
- Donna Seidel (85)
- Elizabeth Coggs (10)
- Fred Clark (81)
- Frederick Kessler (12)
- Gary Hebl (46)
- Gordon Hintz (54)
- Janet Bewley (25)
- Janis Ringhand (15)
- Jill Billings (95)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (8)
- Jon Richards (19)
- Josh Zepnick (9)
- Leon Young (16)
- Louis Molepske Jr. (71)
- Margaret Krusick (7)
- Mark Pocan (78)
- Mark Radcliffe (92)
- Nick Milroy (73)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (57)
- Peter Barca (64)
- Richard Spanbauer (53)
- Robert Turner (61)
- Sandy Pasch (10)
- Sondy Pope (80)
- Steve Doyle (94)
- Tony Staskunas (15)
Not voting · 8
- Dean Knudson (30)
- Erik Severson (28)
- Jason Fields (11)
- John Murtha (29)
- John Steinbrink (65)
- Tamara Grigsby (18)
- Terese Berceau (77)
- Thomas Tiffany (12)
Full history
- Feb 7, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Grothman, Erpenbach and Risser;Cosponsored by Representatives Kleefisch, Roys and Pope-Roberts
- Feb 7, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs
- Feb 10, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 14, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 16, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 31, Noes 2
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 29, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:25 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 56, Noes 35
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 16, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 19, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-19-2012
- Mar 20, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012
- Mar 22, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 139
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-4-2012