Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
exception to local levy limits for the village of Warrens.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Generally under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,
village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not increase its levy by a
percentage that exceeds its "valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of
either zero percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized
value due to new construction, less improvements removed. The base amount of a
political subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the actual levy for
the immediately preceding year.
In 2011, the Department of Revenue (DOR) undervalued a tax incremental
district in the village of Warrens. Under current law, if DOR makes an error in
determining the equalized value in any county or taxation district, DOR corrects the
error by adjusting the taxation district's equalized value in the year after the year
in which DOR made the error. Because of the 2011 valuation error, should the village
impose its intended 2012 levy, the resulting tax rate would be higher than the village
intended. If the village reduces its levy and resulting tax rate, however, the levy will
be less than initially intended and the levy limit for 2013 would be based at the
reduced levy for 2012. Under this bill, the levy limits applicable to the village of
Warrens for 2013 are increased by the amount by which the village reduces its levy
from the amount it would have levied in 2012 if not for the valuation error to
compensate for that error. The actual levy limit increase amount is determined by
the Department of Revenue.
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 29, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 5, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
Passed 33–0 Mar 6, 2012 official source full pageAye · 33
- Alberta Darling (8)
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dale Schultz (17)
- Dave Hansen (30)
- Frank G. Lasee (1)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Glenn Grothman (20)
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Jessica King (18)
- Jim Holperin (12)
- Joe Leibham (9)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Julie M. Lassa (24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (31)
- Leah Vukmir (5)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Mary Lazich (28)
- Michael Ellis (19)
- Neal Kedzie (11)
- Pam Galloway (29)
- Rich Zipperer (33)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Robert Jauch (25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (10)
- Spencer Coggs (6)
- Terry Moulton (23)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
- Timothy Cullen (15)
- Van Wanggaard (21)
Full history
- Feb 9, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Vinehout and Lassa;Cosponsored by Representatives Radcliffe and Vruwink
- Feb 9, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue
- Feb 15, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
LRB correction
- Feb 24, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Human Services, and Revenue, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:24 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 16, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-16-2012
- Mar 20, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-20-2012
- Mar 22, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-21-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 140
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-4-2012