Senate Bill 456
Authorizing the creation of a Fox Cities regional transit authority and making appropriations
Topics: Calumet County, Metropolitan transportation, Outagamie County, Referendum, Winnebago County
Stopped in committee
The voted on it but didn't recommend it, so the full Senate never voted. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 10, 2012
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. The committee didn't recommend it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It sat with the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
The 2009 Biennial Budget Act ( 2009 Act 28 ) authorized the creation of several regional transit authorities (RTAs): the Dane County RTA, the Chippewa Valley RTA, and the Chequamegon Bay RTA. Under 2009 Act 28 , each RTA, once created, is a public body corporate and politic and a separate governmental entity. An RTA's authority is vested in its board of directors, and its bylaws govern its management, operations, and administration. Among its powers, an RTA may operate a transportation system or provide for its operation by contracting with a public or private organization; impose, by its board of directors adopting a resolution, a sales and use tax in the RTA's jurisdictional area at a rate not exceeding 0.5 percent of the gross receipts or sales price if certain conditions are satisfied; acquire property by condemnation; and issue tax-exempt revenue bonds. An RTA has a duty to provide, or contract for the provision of, transit service within the RTA's jurisdictional area.
Rates and other charges received by an RTA must be used only for the general expenses and capital expenditures of the RTA, to pay interest, amortization, and retirement charges on the RTA's revenue bonds, and for specific purposes of the RTA and may not be transferred to any political subdivision.
Read the full summary Show less
The 2011 Biennial Budget Act ( 2011 Act 32 ) eliminated authorization to create an RTA and dissolved the Dane County RTA, the Chippewa Valley RTA, and the Chequamegon Bay RTA to the extent previously created.
This bill authorizes the creation of a Fox Cities RTA, with the same powers and authority as provided other RTAs under 2009 Act 28 . Under the bill, the Fox Cities RTA is created if the governing body of any two or more municipalities located in whole or in part within the urbanized Fox Cities metropolitan planning area (planning area) adopt a resolution authorizing the municipality to become a member of the RTA and each resolution is ratified by the electors at a referendum held in the municipality. Each resolution must also include an identical provision specifying the number and composition of the RTA's board of directors, and all directors must be elected officials of one or more of the RTA's participating political subdivisions. After the Fox Cities RTA is created, any municipality located in whole or in part within the planning area, and any municipality within the counties of Outagamie, Calumet, or Winnebago that is outside the planning area, may also join the RTA if the governing body of the municipality adopts a resolution to join the RTA, the resolution is ratified by the electors at a referendum held in the municipality, and the board of directors of the RTA approves. The jurisdictional area of the Fox Cities RTA is the geographic area encompassing the combined territorial boundaries of all municipalities creating or joining the RTA.
The provisions of 2009 Act 28 are recreated to establish the powers and duties of the Fox Cities RTA. In brief, the RTA's authority is vested in its board of directors and its bylaws govern its management, operations, and administration. The RTA may: operate a transportation system or provide for its operation by contracting with a public or private organization; impose, by its board of directors adopting a resolution, a sales and use tax in the RTA's jurisdictional area at a rate not exceeding 0.5 percent of the sales price if certain conditions are satisfied; acquire property by condemnation; and issue tax-exempt revenue bonds. The RTA has a duty to provide, or contract for the provision of, transit service within the RTA's jurisdictional area.
Rates and other charges received by the RTA must be used only for the general expenses and capital expenditures of the RTA, to pay interest, amortization, and retirement charges on the RTA's revenue bonds, and for specific purposes of the RTA and may not be transferred to any political subdivision.
Who's behind it
Michael Ellis, a Republican, is its .
6 more lawmakers .
See all 7 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Michael Ellis · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (6)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Penny Bernard Schaber · Democrat, Assembly
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- Michelle Litjens · Republican, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Jim Steineke · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate vote
Failed, 2 to 3 · Mar 12, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 19, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 12, 2012
“Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3” (the official wording)
-
Mar 12, 2012
The committee voted on it.
-
Mar 8, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 29, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 10, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.
-
Feb 10, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 10, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Ellis;Cosponsored by Representatives Bernard Schaber, Steineke, Litjens, Berceau, Hintz and Pasch
- Feb 10, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report passage by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 2, Noes 3
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 19, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote