Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 457

Dispensing motor vehicle fuel for persons with disabilities, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty

Topics: District attorney, Gasoline, Motor vehicle: Taxation or registration, Persons with disabilities, Safety and Professional Services, Department of

Passed the Senate, then stopped

The Senate passed it on Mar 6, 2012, but the Assembly never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 10, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Assembly never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a motor vehicle fuel dealer with full-service pumps is required to have an employee dispense motor vehicle fuel for a vehicle that displays registration plates or an identification card that indicates the vehicle is used by a person with a disability. A dealer is required to charge a person receiving such service the same price that the dealer charges at self-service pumps. The current provision applies only to motor vehicle fuel retailers who have been granted a dealership, as defined under current provisions known as the "Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law," not to independent retailers or to retail outlets owned by motor vehicle fuel producers. The provision is enforced by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection.

This bill expands the current requirements. Under the bill, a retailer of motor vehicle fuel must provide an employee or other attendant to dispense motor vehicle fuel if the vehicle displays registration plates or an identification card indicating the vehicle is used by a person with a disability, the driver sounds the vehicle's horn or requests assistance, and more than one employee or attendant is on duty. The requirements apply to all motor vehicle fuel retailers, not just to retailers who have been granted a dealership, and apply regardless of whether a retailer has full-service pumps. The bill also requires a retailer to post signs designed by the Department of Safety and Professional Services indicating that customers with disabilities may obtain assistance in fueling. The bill provides for a $100 forfeiture for each violation of the bill's requirements and transfers enforcement to the district attorney.

Who's behind it

Rich Zipperer, a Republican, is its ⁠.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 9 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 28, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  4. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate passed it.

  5. Mar 2, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Feb 28, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  7. Feb 22, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Feb 22, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Feb 20, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Feb 17, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Feb 10, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  12. Feb 10, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 10, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Zipperer;Cosponsored by Representatives Krusick, Berceau, Bewley, Milroy, Petryk, Sinicki, Spanbauer and Wynn

  2. Feb 10, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  19. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote