Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
dispensing motor vehicle fuel for persons with disabilities, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a motor vehicle fuel dealer with full-service pumps is
required to have an employee dispense motor vehicle fuel for a vehicle that displays
registration plates or an identification card that indicates the vehicle is used by a
person with a disability. A dealer is required to charge a person receiving such
service the same price that the dealer charges at self-service pumps. The current
provision applies only to motor vehicle fuel retailers who have been granted a
dealership, as defined under current provisions known as the "Wisconsin Fair
Dealership Law," not to independent retailers or to retail outlets owned by motor
vehicle fuel producers. The provision is enforced by the Department of Agriculture,
Trade and Consumer Protection.
This bill expands the current requirements. Under the bill, a retailer of motor
vehicle fuel must provide an employee or other attendant to dispense motor vehicle
fuel if the vehicle displays registration plates or an identification card indicating the
vehicle is used by a person with a disability, the driver sounds the vehicle's horn or
requests assistance, and more than one employee or attendant is on duty. The
requirements apply to all motor vehicle fuel retailers, not just to retailers who have
been granted a dealership, and apply regardless of whether a retailer has
full-service pumps. The bill also requires a retailer to post signs designed by the
Department of Safety and Professional Services indicating that customers with
disabilities may obtain assistance in fueling. The bill provides for a $100 forfeiture
for each violation of the bill's requirements and transfers enforcement to the district
attorney.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 28, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 10, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Zipperer;Cosponsored by Representatives Krusick, Berceau, Bewley, Milroy, Petryk, Sinicki, Spanbauer and Wynn
- Feb 10, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 28, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 28, 2012 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 28, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1