Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 461

The governor's read to lead development fund, the Read to Lead Development Council, grants in support of literacy and early childhood development programs, teacher licensure, screening kindergarten pupils for reading readiness, remedial reading services for certain pupils, evaluating teacher preparatory programs and educator effectiveness, requiring the exercise of rule-making authority, and making an appropriation

Topics: Executive office, Governor: Appointments, Kindergarten, Legislative Audit Bureau, Literacy, Public Instruction, Department of, Reorganization of state government, School, Teacher: Certificate

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 10, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 80 to 14

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 166

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Read to lead This bill creates the Read to Lead Development Council in the Office of the Governor. The council consists of the governor, the state superintendent of public instruction, four legislators, and 15 additional members appointed by the governor.

The bill creates a segregated fund, designated the governor's read to lead development fund, consisting of all contributions made to the fund. The bill appropriates moneys in the fund to the governor and to the state superintendent to award grants in support of literacy and early childhood development programs. The governor may award a grant to any person other than a school board. The state superintendent may award a grant only to a school board. The governor and the state superintendent jointly determine the amount of each grant. The bill directs the Read to Lead Development Council to advise the governor and state superintendent on grant recipients.

Read the full summary

Assessments of reading readiness This bill directs each school board and each independent charter school annually to assess all pupils in five-year-old kindergarten programs for reading readiness. If the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) determines that sufficient moneys are available, the school board and the charter school must also assess all pupils in four-year-old kindergarten programs. The school board and charter school must use an assessment selected by DPI. The school board and charter school must provide a pupil whose assessment indicates that he or she is at risk of reading difficulty with remedial reading services. The bill appropriates moneys to DPI to provide school districts and independent charter schools with the assessments.

Teacher licensure Beginning January 1, 2014, the bill prohibits DPI from issuing an initial teaching license that authorizes the holder to teach in grades kindergarten to five or in special education unless the applicant has passed an examination that tests the applicant's knowledge of specified facets of reading development and reading instruction. The bill provides that any teacher who passes the examination must notify DPI in order to have a notation added to the teacher's license indicating that he or she passed the examination.

Teacher preparatory programs Under current law, DPI establishes standards and requirements for and approves education programs leading to licensure as a teacher, including programs leading to licensure as an alternative education program teacher. This bill requires each teacher education program located in this state to, beginning on July 1, 2012, and annually thereafter, provide DPI with a list of graduates, and their graduation dates, from each term or semester of the program's most recently completed academic year. The bill requires DPI to include this information about graduates of teacher education programs in the statewide student information system.

This bill requires DPI to work in consultation with the governor's office, the University or Wisconsin system, chairpersons and ranking members of the senate and assembly education committees, the technical college system, and the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities to determine how the performance of recent graduates of teacher education programs should be used to evaluate the teacher education programs and what measures of performance will be used to evaluate teacher performance. The bill also requires DPI to develop a system through which information about teacher performance and the evaluation of teacher education programs will be made available to the public. The bill requires DPI, beginning in the 2013-14 school year, to report for each teacher education program the rate of passage on first attempt of students and graduates of the program on examinations administered for licensure as a teacher and as an alternative education program teacher, and any other information recommended by DPI in consultation with the entities above, on the system developed as required in the bill.

Beginning in the 2013-14 school year, each teacher education program must prominently display this information on the program's web site and provide this information to persons receiving admissions information to the program.

Educator effectiveness evaluations This bill also requires DPI to develop an educator effectiveness evaluation system (state system) and to develop, by rule, an equivalency process aligned with the state system (equivalency process) to assist school districts in the evaluation of the performance of teachers and principals in the district. Under the state system, 50 percent of the total evaluation score assigned to a teacher or principal must be based on measures of student performance, and 50 percent of the total evaluation score must be based upon the extent to which the teacher's or principal's practice meets standards established under the 2011 Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium or under the 2008 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Educational Leadership Policy Standards, respectively. The equivalency process must be based upon the same interstate standards as the state system and must evaluate a teacher with reference to the following four domains:

planning and preparation, the classroom environment, instruction, and professional responsibilities and development. Teachers and principals evaluated under both the state system and the equivalency process must be placed in one of multiple performance categories. Each school district must begin evaluating teachers and principals using either the state system or the equivalency process in the 2014-15 school year.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. All 3 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 9 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 12 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Education vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 1, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Education vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 1, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 4 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 5, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 16 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 20 to 13 · Mar 6, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 20, Noes 13”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Failed, 34 to 60 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Education, Ayes 34, Noes 60”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 80 to 14 · Mar 15, 2012 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (80)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 80, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 33 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 33”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 34 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 59 to 35 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 59 to 35 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 36 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 5, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 3, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 166.

  3. Mar 30, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 80 to 14.

  5. Mar 8, 2012

    “Printed engrossed by the direction of the Assembly Chief Clerk” (the official wording)

  6. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 20 to 13.

  9. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Mar 6, 2012

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 03-06-2012” (the official wording)

  11. Mar 5, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Mar 5, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  13. Mar 1, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  14. Mar 1, 2012

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  15. Mar 1, 2012

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 4 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  16. Mar 1, 2012

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Amendment 4 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education” (the official wording)

  17. Mar 1, 2012

    “Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 4 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education” (the official wording)

  18. Mar 1, 2012

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  19. Feb 15, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  20. Feb 15, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  21. Feb 10, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  22. Feb 10, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 10, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Olsen, Darling and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Kestell, Ballweg, Brooks, Endsley, Marklein and Spanbauer

  2. Feb 10, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    LRB correction

  5. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Education

  7. Feb 21, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator C. Larson

  8. Feb 23, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Vinehout

  9. Feb 23, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Vinehout

  10. Feb 24, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Olsen

  11. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  12. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 4 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education

  13. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Amendment 4 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Education

  14. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 3 to Senate Amendment 4 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 6, Noes 0 by committee on Education

  15. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 4 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  16. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  17. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  18. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  20. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  21. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 03-06-2012

  24. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  25. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 to Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  26. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 to Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Grothman and Olsen

  27. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 to Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  28. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  29. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Grothman and Olsen

  30. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  31. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Vinehout, Taylor, Holperin, C. Larson, King, T. Cullen, Risser, Wirch, Miller, Lassa and Hansen

  32. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table

  33. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators C. Larson, Vinehout, Taylor, Holperin, Erpenbach, Hansen, Lassa, Miller, Risser, Wirch, King, Shilling, T. Cullen and S. Coggs

  34. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 17, Noes 16

  35. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 8 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Lassa, Wirch, S. Coggs, T. Cullen, C. Larson, Shilling, Miller, Hansen, Risser, Erpenbach and Carpenter

  36. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 8 to Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table

  37. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted

  38. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  39. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  40. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 20, Noes 13

  41. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  42. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  43. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  44. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Krusick

  45. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Krusick and Fields

  46. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:32 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  47. Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Printed engrossed by the direction of the Assembly Chief Clerk

  48. Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Krusick

  49. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  50. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Clark and Hintz

  51. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 36

  52. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  53. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  54. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Krusick

  55. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 33

  56. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 34

  57. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Mason, Turner and Barca

  58. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to refer to committee on Education, Ayes 34, Noes 60

  59. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 35

  60. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Clark and Hintz

  61. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 35

  62. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  63. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  64. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 80, Noes 14

  65. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  66. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  67. Mar 21, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-21-2012

  68. Mar 30, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012

  69. Apr 3, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 166

  70. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-16-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote