Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
registration of motor vehicles by the Department of Transportation.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) must refuse
registration of a vehicle under specified circumstances, including all of the following:
1) the applicant for registration has not paid the applicable registration fees; 2) with
an exception for leased vehicles, the applicant has not been issued, and is not entitled
to, a valid certificate of title for the vehicle; 3) the vehicle is exempt from registration
and is not eligible for optional registration; 4) with an exception for former military
vehicles eligible for a specific type of registration, the vehicle is originally designed
and manufactured for off-highway operation unless the vehicle meets the provisions
of a certain section of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, as
amended; 5) with an exception for former military vehicles eligible for a specific type
of registration, the vehicle was manufactured for use in any country's military forces
and does not meet federal motor vehicle safety standards; and 6) the applicant has
failed to furnish information or documents required by law or by DOT under
authority of law.
Under current law, as created by
2009 Wisconsin Act 135
, there is a special
category of vehicle registration for former military vehicles, which may be registered
but are subject to operating restrictions. Under this registration category, a "former
military vehicle" is a vehicle that was manufactured for use in any country's military
forces and is maintained to accurately represent its military design and markings,
regardless of the vehicle's size or weight. A former military vehicle may be registered
as a "historic military vehicle" if it is at least 25 years old and has been imported into
the United States from another country or if it has not been imported and is of any
age. DOT must issue for the vehicle special plates showing it is registered as a
historic military vehicle. It is the applicant's burden to show that a vehicle is eligible
for registration as a historic military vehicle. A vehicle may be registered as a
historic military vehicle even if the vehicle was originally designed and
manufactured for off-highway operation and does not meet federal motor vehicle
safety standards. A vehicle registered as a historic military vehicle may only be used
for special occasions such as display and parade purposes, including traveling to and
from such events, and for necessary testing, maintenance, and storage purposes.
Also under current law, as created by
2009 Wisconsin Act 225
, DOT may
register specific types of former military vehicles as special interest ("collector")
vehicles, which are subject to only very limited operating restrictions, most notably
that they cannot be operated on the highways in January. For purposes of collector
vehicle registration, the term "former military vehicle" has a different definition, and
means all of the following: 1) a Pinzgauer that is at least 25 years old; 2) a Kaiser
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 12, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 12, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
Passed 33–0 Mar 13, 2012 official source full pageAye · 33
- Alberta Darling (8)
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dale Schultz (17)
- Dave Hansen (30)
- Frank G. Lasee (1)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Glenn Grothman (20)
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Jessica King (18)
- Jim Holperin (12)
- Joe Leibham (9)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Julie M. Lassa (24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (31)
- Leah Vukmir (5)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Mary Lazich (28)
- Michael Ellis (19)
- Neal Kedzie (11)
- Pam Galloway (29)
- Rich Zipperer (33)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Robert Jauch (25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (10)
- Spencer Coggs (6)
- Terry Moulton (23)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
- Timothy Cullen (15)
- Van Wanggaard (21)
Full history
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Grothman, Erpenbach and Wanggaard;Cosponsored by Representatives Wynn, Petrowski, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Endsley, Kestell, Kerkman, Stroebel, Marklein, A. Ott and Krug
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Grothman
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 2 adopted
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 9:17 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 19, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 26, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2012
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012
- Apr 6, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 235
- Apr 10, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-19-2012