Senate Bill 462
Registration of motor vehicles by the Department of Transportation
Topics: Military property, Motor vehicle: Taxation or registration, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 13, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 13, 2012
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 15, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 235
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) must refuse registration of a vehicle under specified circumstances, including all of the following:
1) the applicant for registration has not paid the applicable registration fees; 2) with an exception for leased vehicles, the applicant has not been issued, and is not entitled to, a valid certificate of title for the vehicle; 3) the vehicle is exempt from registration and is not eligible for optional registration; 4) with an exception for former military vehicles eligible for a specific type of registration, the vehicle is originally designed and manufactured for off-highway operation unless the vehicle meets the provisions of a certain section of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, as amended; 5) with an exception for former military vehicles eligible for a specific type of registration, the vehicle was manufactured for use in any country's military forces and does not meet federal motor vehicle safety standards; and 6) the applicant has failed to furnish information or documents required by law or by DOT under authority of law.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, as created by 2009 Wisconsin Act 135 , there is a special category of vehicle registration for former military vehicles, which may be registered but are subject to operating restrictions. Under this registration category, a "former military vehicle" is a vehicle that was manufactured for use in any country's military forces and is maintained to accurately represent its military design and markings, regardless of the vehicle's size or weight. A former military vehicle may be registered as a "historic military vehicle" if it is at least 25 years old and has been imported into the United States from another country or if it has not been imported and is of any age. DOT must issue for the vehicle special plates showing it is registered as a historic military vehicle. It is the applicant's burden to show that a vehicle is eligible for registration as a historic military vehicle. A vehicle may be registered as a historic military vehicle even if the vehicle was originally designed and manufactured for off-highway operation and does not meet federal motor vehicle safety standards. A vehicle registered as a historic military vehicle may only be used for special occasions such as display and parade purposes, including traveling to and from such events, and for necessary testing, maintenance, and storage purposes.
Also under current law, as created by 2009 Wisconsin Act 225 , DOT may register specific types of former military vehicles as special interest ("collector") vehicles, which are subject to only very limited operating restrictions, most notably that they cannot be operated on the highways in January. For purposes of collector vehicle registration, the term "former military vehicle" has a different definition, and means all of the following: 1) a Pinzgauer that is at least 25 years old; 2) a Kaiser Jeep M715 that is at least 25 years old; 3) a Humvee that is at least 22 years old; and 4) a Duck that is at least 25 years old.
This bill requires DOT to register any motor vehicle for which DOT receives a complete and proper application, unless registration of the vehicle is specifically prohibited by statute or the vehicle is a snowmobile, all-terrain vehicle, or electric personal assistive mobility device (commonly referred to by the tradename "Segway"). The bill eliminates the statutory provision requiring DOT to refuse registration of a vehicle that was manufactured for use in any country's military forces and that does not meet federal motor vehicle safety standards. The bill also eliminates the statutory provision requiring DOT to refuse registration of a vehicle that is originally designed and manufactured for off-highway operation unless the vehicle meets the provisions of a certain section of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, as amended. In addition, if DOT refuses registration of a vehicle based on vehicle requirements, including equipment or condition of the vehicle or documentation relating to the vehicle, the applicant for registration may have the vehicle inspected by any person authorized by DOT to conduct salvage vehicle inspections. If the inspector determines that the vehicle meets state vehicle equipment standards for the vehicle's year of original manufacture, the inspector must issue a certificate of inspection so stating and DOT must accept this certificate and register the vehicle.
This bill also changes the eligibility requirements for registering former military vehicles as collector vehicles. Instead of limiting registration to the four specific types of military vehicles listed in 1) to 4) above, the bill allows any former military vehicle to be registered as a collector vehicle, subject to the same requirements applicable to other collector vehicles. For purposes of collector vehicle registration, the bill defines a "former military vehicle" as a motor vehicle, including a motorcycle but excluding a tracked vehicle, that was manufactured for use in any country's military forces.
The bill also modifies an eligibility requirement for registering any collector vehicle, whether it is a former military vehicle or not. Under current law, a motor vehicle, other than a former military vehicle, may only be registered as a collector vehicle if it has not been altered or modified from original manufacturers specifications. Under this bill, a motor vehicle, including a former military vehicle, may only be registered as a collector vehicle if it has not been substantially altered or modified from original manufacturers specifications.
This bill does not change the authorization provided in 2009 Wisconsin Act 135 to register former military vehicles under the special registration category of historic military vehicles.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . 2 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
11 more lawmakers .
See all 14 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
- Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (11)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Endsley · Republican, Assembly
- Samantha Kerkman · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Kestell · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Evan Wynn · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 12, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 12, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 33 to 0 · Mar 13, 2012
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (33)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jessica King (D, 18)
- Jim Holperin (D, 12)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Pam Galloway (R, 29)
- Rich Zipperer (R, 33)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Spencer Coggs (D, 6)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 10, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 6, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 235.
-
Apr 5, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 15, 2012
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 13, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Assembly received it.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Senate adopted it.
-
Mar 12, 2012
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 12, 2012
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Mar 12, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Mar 12, 2012
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 9, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 8, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 13, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.
-
Feb 13, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Grothman, Erpenbach and Wanggaard;Cosponsored by Representatives Wynn, Petrowski, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Endsley, Kestell, Kerkman, Stroebel, Marklein, A. Ott and Krug
- Feb 13, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Grothman
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 2 adopted
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 9:17 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 19, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 26, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2012
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012
- Apr 6, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 235
- Apr 10, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-19-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote