Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 463

The angel investment and early stage seed investment tax credit programs

Topics: Business, Corporation: Taxation, Economic Development Corporation, Wisconsin, Franchise: Taxation, Income tax: Credit, Revenue, Department of

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 13, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 90 to 3

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 213

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the angel investment tax credit program allows a taxpayer to claim a tax credit that equals 25 percent of a bona fide angel investment made directly in a qualified new business venture (QNBV) for the tax year. Current law provides that a QNBV is a business that is certified by the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC). Under current law, WEDC may certify a business as a QNBV if the business meets certain conditions, including being headquartered in this state, employing at least 51 percent of its employees in this state, and having less than 100 employees. Under this bill, in addition to the existing certification conditions, to be certified as a QNBV a business must agree to stay in this state for at least three years following the receipt of a bona fide angel investment and must agree to pay a penalty to WEDC if the business relocates outside of this state within three years of receiving a bona fide angel investment. Additionally, the bill provides that certain conditions that a business must satisfy to be certified as a QNBV, such as having less than 100 employees and not having operated in Wisconsin for more than ten consecutive years, apply only to initial certifications.

Under current law, a person who claims a tax credit for an early stage seed or angel investment must hold the investment for at least three years. If the person does not hold the investment for at least three years, the person must pay to the Department of Revenue (DOR) the amount of the credit that the person received related to the investment. Under this bill, a person that holds such an investment for less than three years does not have to repay the tax credit to DOR, if the person's investment becomes worthless, as determined by WEDC, or if a bona fide liquidity event occurs, as determined by WEDC.

Read the full summary

Under current law, the maximum amount of angel investment credits that may be claimed by all claimants for all taxable years combined is $47,500,000. The bill eliminates this limitation.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Republicans.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 5 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 7 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Feb 23, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 5, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 17 to 16 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Point of order that Senate amendment 3 not germane well taken, Ayes 17, Noes 16”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 1 · Mar 6, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 90 to 3 · Mar 15, 2012 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (90)

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 90, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 59 to 34 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 59 to 34 · Mar 15, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly substitute amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 213.

  3. Apr 4, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too, 90 to 3.

  5. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 32 to 1.

  8. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Mar 6, 2012

    “Point of order that Senate amendment 3 not germane well taken, Ayes 17, Noes 16” (the official wording)

  10. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  11. Mar 5, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Mar 5, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  13. Mar 1, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 23, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  15. Feb 16, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Feb 14, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Feb 13, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs.

  18. Feb 13, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Leibham and Darling;Cosponsored by Representatives Kuglitsch, Klenke and Tauchen

  2. Feb 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs

  3. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 23, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Economic Development and Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Feb 23, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Feb 23, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Leibham

  9. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Leibham

  11. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 withdrawn and returned to author

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 offered by Senators Hansen, Taylor, Holperin, C. Larson, King, Wirch, Risser, Miller, Lassa and Vinehout

  18. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Point of order that Senate amendment 3 not germane well taken, Ayes 17, Noes 16

  19. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 offered by Senator Leibham

  20. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 adopted

  21. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  23. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 1

  24. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  26. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  27. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:35 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  28. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  29. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Barca, Seidel, Pasch, Danou, Sinicki, Turner, Hebl, Vruwink, Clark, Bernard Schaber, Milroy, Molepske Jr and Jorgensen

  30. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 34

  31. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representatives Barca, Pasch, Mason, Molepske Jr and Seidel

  32. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 34

  33. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  34. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  35. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 90, Noes 3

  36. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  37. Mar 16, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  38. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-23-2012

  39. Apr 4, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-4-2012

  40. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-5-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 213

  41. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote