Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 472

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

certain shoreland zoning standards and ordinances that regulate the repair and expansion of nonconforming structures.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a county must enact a shoreland zoning ordinance for all

shorelands in its unincorporated area and the ordinance must meet shoreland

zoning standards established by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) by

rule. Current law defines a shoreland to be an area within a certain distance from

the edge of a navigable water. Current law also specifies that, if a shoreland area is

annexed by a city or village (annexing municipality) or is part of a town that

incorporates as a city or village (incorporated municipality), then, with certain

exceptions, the county shoreland zoning ordinance continues in effect and must be

enforced by the annexing or incorporated municipality. The exceptions in current

law allow the annexing or incorporated municipality to enforce its own zoning

ordinance with respect to shorelands if the ordinance complies with shoreland

zoning standards that are at least as restrictive as the county shoreland zoning

ordinance.

This bill prohibits a county from enacting, and prohibits a county, city, or village

from enforcing, any provision in a county shoreland zoning ordinance that regulates

the use, location, maintenance, expansion, replacement, or relocation of a

nonconforming structure if that provision is more restrictive than the shoreland

zoning standards for nonconforming structures promulgated by DNR. The

prohibition under the bill also applies to a shoreland zoning ordinance enacted by an

annexing or incorporated municipality. The bill defines a nonconforming structure

as a dwelling or building that does not conform with a county shoreland zoning

ordinance, other than an ordinance regulating a nonconforming use, but that

lawfully existed before the county shoreland zoning ordinance was enacted.

The bill also provides that DNR may not establish a shoreland zoning standard,

and a county may not enact or enforce a shoreland zoning ordinance, that prohibits

the construction of a structure or building on certain lots, parcels, or tracts (lots).

Under the bill, a shoreland zoning standard or ordinance may not prohibit the

construction of a structure or a building on a lot that does not meet minimum area

and width requirements if the lot met those requirements when the lot was originally

created or if there was no shoreland zoning standard or ordinance in effect that

established minimum area and width requirements when the lot was originally

created.

Generally under current law, zoning restrictions that would otherwise apply to

a damaged or destroyed nonconforming structure may not prohibit, subject to a

number of conditions, the restoration of the structure if it will be restored to the size,

location, and use it had before the damage or destruction occurred, unless the size

must be larger to comply with state or federal requirements. In addition, and subject

to the same conditions, the restrictions in the zoning ordinance may not impose

limits on the costs of the repair, reconstruction, or improvement of the structure. The

conditions that apply to the restrictions in the zoning ordinance are as follows:

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: King (D) , Lasee (R)

7 cosponsors

Jacque (R) , Litjens (R) , Murtha (R) , Rivard (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Steineke (R) , Tiffany (R)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 2

Passed 4–2 Mar 2, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 53, Noes 28, Paired 6

Passed 53–28 Mar 15, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 53

Full history

  1. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lasee and King;Cosponsored by Representatives Tiffany, Steineke, Murtha, Litjens, Rivard and Jacque

  2. Feb 14, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing

  3. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 24, 2012 · Senate

    Representative Spanbauer added as a cosponsor

  6. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 2

  7. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lasee

  9. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  10. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  11. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Holperin

  12. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 adopted

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Motion to reconsider vote by which bill was passed offered by Senator Lasee

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Vote by which bill was passed reconsidered, Ayes 17, Noes 16

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Motion to reconsider vote by wihch bill was ordered to a third reading offered by Senator Lasee

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Vote by which bill was ordered to a third reading reconsidered

  20. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Motion to reconsider vote by which Senate amendment 2 was adopted offered by Senator Lasee

  21. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Vote by which Senate Amendment 2 was adopted reconsidered

  22. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 laid on table

  23. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  25. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  26. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  28. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  29. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 9:19 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24

  30. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  31. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  32. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  33. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  34. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 53, Noes 28, Paired 6

  35. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  36. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  37. Mar 28, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-28-2012

  38. Mar 30, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012

  39. Apr 3, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 170

  40. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-16-2012