Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 478

Giving notice of, and providing assistance after, a motor vehicle accident and providing a penalty

Topics: Forfeiture, Garage, Motor vehicle: Accident, Police, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 15, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 13, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 15, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 256

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, if an operator of a vehicle has an accident resulting in personal injury or vehicle damage, the operator must immediately stop the vehicle at or near the scene of the accident, provide certain information, and render reasonable assistance to any injured person. If an operator of a vehicle has an accident with an unattended vehicle or with property on or adjacent to a highway, the operator must immediately stop and fulfill certain obligations to provide notice of the vehicle operator's identity. The operator of a vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury or death to a person or damage to property in specified amounts (reportable accident) must also immediately give notice of the accident to law enforcement, by the quickest means of communication. Within ten days after an accident, the vehicle operator must also make a written report of the accident to the Department of Transportation (DOT) unless a report has already been made by a law enforcement agency. If the vehicle operator is physically incapable of giving the immediate notice, and making the written report, after an accident, the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident must give the notice and make the report. If the vehicle owner is physically or mentally incapable of giving the notice and making the report and there was an occupant in the vehicle at the time of the accident capable of giving the notice and making the report, the occupant must give the notice and make the report.

Under current law, if a vehicle operator fails to give immediate notice after an accident, the vehicle operator may be required to forfeit not less than $40 nor more than $200 for the first offense and may be required to forfeit not less than $100 nor more than $500 for the second or subsequent conviction within a year. A vehicle owner or occupant required to give notice after an accident, when the vehicle operator is incapable of doing so, is subject to this same penalty.

Read the full summary

Also under current law, DOT may adopt, by rule, a demerit point system for the purpose of determining when to suspend a person's operating privilege for being a habitually reckless or negligent driver or repeatedly violating traffic laws. Under this system, DOT may assess demerit points against the driving record of a person convicted of violations of certain traffic laws. Despite DOT's general discretion to develop a demerit point scale assigning demerit point amounts for specific violations, there are certain violations for which DOT is required by statute to assess a specific number of demerit points and certain violations for which DOT is prohibited from assessing demerit points.

This bill requires a motor vehicle occupant, as well as the motor vehicle operator, to immediately give notice to law enforcement after a reportable accident.

The bill also increases the penalty for violating this notice requirement to a forfeiture of not less than $200 nor more than $500 for the first offense and not less than $300 nor more than $500 for the second or subsequent conviction within a year. The bill also requires DOT to assess six demerit points against the driving record of a vehicle operator who fails to give notice as required.

The bill also creates certain requirements applicable to those who render assistance after a reportable accident. Under the bill, a person in the business of towing, recovery, or repair of motor vehicles may not contract for retrieval, recovery, or removal from the scene of a reportable accident of any motor vehicle that has sustained damage unless the person has been contacted by a law enforcement agency. Moreover, a person in the business of towing, recovery, or repair of motor vehicles may not retrieve, recover, or remove from the scene of a reportable accident any motor vehicle that has sustained damage unless a law enforcement officer is present or has given prior approval. However, these provisions do not apply if removal of the vehicle from the roadway at the scene of the accident is necessary to avoid imminent danger to motorists or other persons. In addition, under the bill, a person may not assist an operator or occupant of a motor vehicle involved in a reportable accident unless the person has first reported the accident to a law enforcement agency or has verified that another person has already reported the accident to a law enforcement agency. However, there are exceptions to this requirement for persons whose profession involves rendering medical assistance;

persons who are not related by blood or marriage to, or closely acquainted with, the operator or occupant of the motor vehicle; and persons who have no knowledge that there was a traffic accident. A person who violates these new requirements applicable to those who render assistance after a reportable accident may be required to forfeit not less than $40 nor more than $200.

Who's behind it

4 lawmakers are its ⁠. 2 are Republicans. 2 have no party on record.

See all 4 names

Authors (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 12, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 12, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Mar 13, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 256.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Mar 13, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  8. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Mar 12, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  10. Mar 12, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  11. Mar 12, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  12. Mar 12, 2012

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  13. Mar 8, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 22, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Feb 15, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  16. Feb 15, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators S. Fitzgerald and Olsen, by request of Sheriff of Dodge County, Todd M. Nehls

  2. Feb 15, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  3. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator S. Fitzgerald

  6. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  18. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  19. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  21. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  22. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 9:20 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  29. Mar 26, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2012

  30. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  31. Apr 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 256

  32. Apr 10, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote