Senate Bill 480
An expenditure of $90,000 from the general fund for payment of a claim against the state made by Robert Lee Stinson
Topics: Claims, Stinson, Robert Lee
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 15, 2012
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the joint committee on Finance. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill directs expenditure of $90,000 from the general fund in payment of a claim made by Robert Lee Stinson against the state. In November 1984, the body of Ione Cychosz was found in the city of Milwaukee. Ms. Cychosz was beaten to death and there were numerous bite marks on her body. In December 1985, the claimant was tried and convicted of her murder. There were no witnesses against him, and the only physical evidence was expert witness testimony purporting to match the claimant's dentition with the bite marks on the victim's body. The bite marks did not match because the claimant was missing a tooth, and the bite marks showed the perpetrator did not have that tooth missing, but the claimant's attorney failed to raise that issue. The claimant was sentenced to life imprisonment. After his conviction, the claimant obtained a reexamination of the bite mark evidence using more modern odontological techniques that excluded the claimant as the perpetrator. The state crime laboratory examined samples of the blood and saliva found on the victim's clothing and conclusively excluded the claimant as the source of the samples. The claimant asserted that at the time of the crime he was at a party, which was corroborated by five other persons. In January 2009, the circuit court for Milwaukee County vacated the claimant's conviction and sentence. In July 2009, the state dismissed all charges against the claimant. In July 2009, the DNA of another man, Moses Price, was matched to the crime scene and Mr. Price confessed to the crime. The claimant claimed $5,000 per year for 23 years of wrongful imprisonment plus $14,000 in attorney fees on behalf of the Wisconsin Innocence Project, which provided assistance to the claimant (total $129,000).
Under section 775.05 of the statutes the Claims Board may award compensation to a person who is imprisoned for a crime of which he or she is innocent if the board finds that the evidence is clear and convincing, that the person is innocent, and that the person did not by his or her act or failure to act contribute to bring about the conviction for which he or she seeks compensation. The amount awarded by the board may not exceed a total of $25,000, nor may an award be based upon a rate of compensation exceeding $5,000 per year. Compensation awarded by the board must include any amount to which the board finds that the claimant is entitled for attorney fees, costs, and disbursements. Under the law, if the board finds that the amount it is able to award is not adequate, it must recommend an adequate amount to the legislature.
Read the full summary Show less
On December 27, 2010, the claims board awarded compensation to the claimant in the amount of $25,000, which was paid to the claimant on January 4, 2011. In addition, the board recommended that the claimant be paid an additional $90,000 for wrongful imprisonment (total $115,000). See Senate Journal , pp. 24-25.
Who's behind it
4 senators are its . All 4 are Democrats.
6 more lawmakers .
See all 10 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Chris Larson · Democrat, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (6)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 20, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 15, 2012
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Feb 15, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 15, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Taylor, Hansen, Risser and C. Larson;Cosponsored by Representatives Spanbauer, Turner, Grigsby, Berceau, Hebl and Fields
- Feb 15, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate