Senate Bill 487
The provision of information regarding health care benefits provided to certain assistance program recipients
Topics: Health Services, Department of: Supportive living and treatment, Insurance: Health, Medical assistance, Nursing homes and adult care, Pharmacy, Women
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 16, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 7, 2012
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 15, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 189
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, as a condition of doing business in this state, certain payers of health care benefits (called third parties) must provide to the Department of Health Services (DHS) information from their records to enable DHS to ascertain whether an individual, or his or her spouse or dependent, who has been or is a recipient under an assistance program, has received or is receiving health care coverage or benefits from a third party. The assistance programs for which DHS seeks information about recipients are the Medical Assistance (MA) program, including the Badger Care health care program, Family Care, Senior Care, the Well-Woman Program, and the program that provides financial assistance for the cost of medical care to persons with chronic kidney disease, cystic fibrosis, and hemophilia. The third parties may receive compensation for providing the information, must provide the information within certain deadlines, and may be subject to enforcement proceedings for noncompliance. The third parties must accept assignment to DHS of a recipient's right to receive payment from the third party for a health care item or service for which payment under an assistance program has been made, as well as the right of DHS to recover any third-party payment made for which assignment had not been accepted, and may not deny a DHS claim on the basis of certain circumstances, if submitted less than 36 months after the health care item or service is provided and if action by DHS to enforce its rights is commenced less than 72 months after DHS submits the claim.
This bill makes modifications to the third parties that are required to provide information to DHS and from which DHS may recover payments for health care services provided to recipients. Under current law, a third party is defined as an insurer, an employee benefit plan, a service benefit plan, or a pharmacy benefits manager. A service benefit plan, which is a plan providing health care benefits to federal government employees, is defined by a reference to federal law. The bill corrects the federal law citation for the definition. An employee benefit plan is also defined by a reference to federal law. The bill changes the federal law citation so that government-provided health care plans, which are exempted under the current law definition, are included. The bill also changes the definition of a pharmacy benefits manager, which, under current law, includes a person that performs pharmacy benefits management functions with respect to prescription drug benefits that are provided by a nonprofit hospital, an employer, a labor union, or another organization.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill redefines a pharmacy benefits manager simply as an entity that administers or manages prescription drug benefits provided by an insurer or other third party.
Finally, the bill adds three other types of third parties: an issuer of a health insurance policy (called disability insurance policy in the statutes); a group health plan, which is a health care plan that provides medical services, directly or through insurance or reimbursement or otherwise, to employees, and specifically includes a self-insured plan; and an entity that administers benefits on behalf of another risk-bearing third party, including a third party administrator, a fiscal intermediary, or a managed care contractor.
Who's behind it
Pam Galloway, a Republican, is its .
11 more lawmakers .
See all 12 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Pam Galloway · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (11)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Endsley · Republican, Assembly
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- John Nygren · Republican, Assembly
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
- Erik Severson · Republican, Assembly
- Karl Van Roy · Republican, Assembly
- Robin Vos · Republican, Assembly
- Evan Wynn · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing vote on an amendment
Passed, 6 to 0 · Mar 2, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 6, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization ,pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 19 to 14 · Mar 7, 2012
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (19)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Pam Galloway (R, 29)
- Rich Zipperer (R, 33)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (14)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Jessica King (D, 18)
- Jim Holperin (D, 12)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Spencer Coggs (D, 6)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 19, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 5, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 3, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 189.
-
Mar 30, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 15, 2012
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 9, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 9, 2012
The Assembly received it.
-
Mar 7, 2012
The Senate passed it, 19 to 14.
-
Mar 7, 2012
The Senate adopted it.
-
Mar 6, 2012
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 6, 2012
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Mar 2, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 2.
-
Mar 2, 2012
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 24, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 22, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 16, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing.
-
Feb 16, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 16, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Galloway;Cosponsored by Representatives Nygren, Ballweg, Bies, Brooks, Endsley, LeMahieu, Petersen, Severson, Van Roy, Wynn and Vos
- Feb 16, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 24, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 28, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Galloway
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization ,pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-7-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 19, Noes 14
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 9:21 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 19, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 26, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2012
- Mar 30, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012
- Apr 3, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 189
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-16-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote