Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 487

The provision of information regarding health care benefits provided to certain assistance program recipients

Topics: Health Services, Department of: Supportive living and treatment, Insurance: Health, Medical assistance, Nursing homes and adult care, Pharmacy, Women

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 16, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 7, 2012

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 15, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 189

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, as a condition of doing business in this state, certain payers of health care benefits (called third parties) must provide to the Department of Health Services (DHS) information from their records to enable DHS to ascertain whether an individual, or his or her spouse or dependent, who has been or is a recipient under an assistance program, has received or is receiving health care coverage or benefits from a third party. The assistance programs for which DHS seeks information about recipients are the Medical Assistance (MA) program, including the Badger Care health care program, Family Care, Senior Care, the Well-Woman Program, and the program that provides financial assistance for the cost of medical care to persons with chronic kidney disease, cystic fibrosis, and hemophilia. The third parties may receive compensation for providing the information, must provide the information within certain deadlines, and may be subject to enforcement proceedings for noncompliance. The third parties must accept assignment to DHS of a recipient's right to receive payment from the third party for a health care item or service for which payment under an assistance program has been made, as well as the right of DHS to recover any third-party payment made for which assignment had not been accepted, and may not deny a DHS claim on the basis of certain circumstances, if submitted less than 36 months after the health care item or service is provided and if action by DHS to enforce its rights is commenced less than 72 months after DHS submits the claim.

This bill makes modifications to the third parties that are required to provide information to DHS and from which DHS may recover payments for health care services provided to recipients. Under current law, a third party is defined as an insurer, an employee benefit plan, a service benefit plan, or a pharmacy benefits manager. A service benefit plan, which is a plan providing health care benefits to federal government employees, is defined by a reference to federal law. The bill corrects the federal law citation for the definition. An employee benefit plan is also defined by a reference to federal law. The bill changes the federal law citation so that government-provided health care plans, which are exempted under the current law definition, are included. The bill also changes the definition of a pharmacy benefits manager, which, under current law, includes a person that performs pharmacy benefits management functions with respect to prescription drug benefits that are provided by a nonprofit hospital, an employer, a labor union, or another organization.

Read the full summary

The bill redefines a pharmacy benefits manager simply as an entity that administers or manages prescription drug benefits provided by an insurer or other third party.

Finally, the bill adds three other types of third parties: an issuer of a health insurance policy (called disability insurance policy in the statutes); a group health plan, which is a health care plan that provides medical services, directly or through insurance or reimbursement or otherwise, to employees, and specifically includes a self-insured plan; and an entity that administers benefits on behalf of another risk-bearing third party, including a third party administrator, a fiscal intermediary, or a managed care contractor.

Who's behind it

Pam Galloway, a Republican, is its ⁠.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 0 · Mar 2, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization ,pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 19 to 14 · Mar 7, 2012

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 19, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 5, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 3, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 189.

  3. Mar 30, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 15, 2012

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Mar 9, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Mar 9, 2012

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Mar 7, 2012

    The Senate passed it, 19 to 14.

  8. Mar 7, 2012

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Mar 6, 2012

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  10. Mar 6, 2012

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  11. Mar 2, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 2.

  12. Mar 2, 2012

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  13. Feb 24, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 22, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Feb 16, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing.

  16. Feb 16, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Galloway;Cosponsored by Representatives Nygren, Ballweg, Bies, Brooks, Endsley, LeMahieu, Petersen, Severson, Van Roy, Wynn and Vos

  2. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing

  3. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 24, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Galloway

  6. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  7. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 2

  8. Mar 2, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization ,pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-7-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  14. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  16. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  17. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Mar 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 9:21 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24

  21. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  24. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  27. Mar 26, 2012 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2012

  28. Mar 30, 2012 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012

  29. Apr 3, 2012 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 189

  30. Apr 5, 2012 · Senate

    Published 4-16-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote