Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

SB 488

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

regulation of ferrous metallic mining and related activities, procedures for obtaining approvals from the Department of Natural Resources for the construction of utility facilities, making an appropriation, and providing penalties.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Overview

This bill makes changes in the laws relating to the regulation of iron mining and

procedures for utility facility approvals.

Procedures for utility facility approvals

Under current law, with certain exceptions, a person may not begin the

construction of certain utility facilities before the Public Service Commission (PSC)

has issued to the person either a certificate of public convenience and necessity

(CPCN) or a certificate authorizing the person to transact public utility business

(PSC certificate). Current law also provides that a utility facility that is required to

obtain a PSC certificate and that is required to obtain one or more permits from the

Department of Natural Resources (DNR), such as a permit allowing the placement

of a structure in navigable waters, must use a procedure that requires the utility

facility to submit only one application to DNR for all of the required DNR permits

(combined permit procedure) rather than submitting separate applications to DNR

for each permit. Current law also specifies that the applicant under the combined

permit procedure must submit the combined application for permits to DNR at the

same time that the applicant files an application for a PSC certificate.

This bill makes the combined permit procedure optional and allows a utility

facility to submit separate applications to DNR for each required permit. Under the

bill, if the utility facility does not use the combined permit procedure, it is not

required to file a DNR permit application at the same time that it files an application

for a PSC certificate.

Current law requires a person proposing to construct a large electric generating

facility or high-voltage transmission line (facility) to provide DNR with an

engineering plan or project plan for the facility at least 60 days before filing an

application with PSC for a CPCN. Within 30 days thereafter, DNR must provide the

person with a listing of each DNR approval that appears to be required for the

construction or operation of the facility. Current law requires the person to file the

application for these approvals within 20 days after receiving the listing from DNR.

This bill eliminates this 20-day deadline and also specifies that the person must only

apply for those approvals identified in the listing that are applicable.

Iron mining, generally

Under current law, DNR regulates mining for metallic minerals. The laws

under which DNR regulates metallic mining apply to mining for ferrous minerals

(iron) and mining for nonferrous minerals, such as copper or zinc.

This bill creates new statutes for regulating iron mining and modifies the

current laws regulating metallic mining so that they cover only mining for

nonferrous minerals.

Under current law, a person who proposes to mine for metallic minerals must

obtain a mining permit and any other permit, license, certification, or other

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Darling (R) , Galloway (R) , Grothman (R) , Kedzie (R) , Lasee (R) , Lazich (R) , Leibham (R) , S. Fitzgerald (R) , Vukmir (R) , Wanggaard (R) , Zipperer (R)

59 cosponsors

A. Ott (R) , August (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Craig (R) , Endsley (R) , Farrow (R) , Honadel (R) , J. Fitzgerald (R) , J. Ott (R) , Jacque (R) , Kapenga (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kestell (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Klenke (R) , Knilans (R) , Knodl (R) , Knudson (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Kramer (R) , Krug (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Litjens (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Marklein (R) , Meyer (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Nass (R) , Nerison (R) , Nygren (R) , Petersen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Petryk (R) , Pridemore (R) , Ripp (R) , Rivard (R) , Severson (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Steineke (R) , Stone (R) , Strachota (R) , Stroebel (R) , Suder (R) , T. Larson (R) , Tauchen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tiffany (R) , Tranel (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Weininger (R) , Williams (R) , Wynn (R)

Votes

Senate: Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

Passed 16–0 Mar 6, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Galloway, Vukmir, Zipperer, Wanggaard, Darling, S. Fitzgerald, Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Kedzie and Grothman;Cosponsored by Representatives J. Fitzgerald, Suder, Williams, Tiffany, Honadel, August, Ballweg, Bernier, Bies, Brooks, Craig, Endsley, Farrow, Jacque, Kapenga, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kestell, Kleefisch, Klenke, Knilans, Knodl, Knudson, Kooyenga, Kramer, Krug, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Loudenbeck, Marklein, Meyer, Mursau, Murtha, Nass, Nerison, Nygren, A. Ott, J. Ott, Petersen, Petrowski, Petryk, Pridemore, Ripp, Rivard, Severson, Spanbauer, Steineke, Stone, Strachota, Stroebel, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Van Roy, Vos, Weininger and Wynn

  2. Feb 16, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance

  3. Feb 17, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 24, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 24, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    LRB correction

  7. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4

  9. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 3 offered by Senators Jauch, Schultz, King, Holperin, Hansen, Erpenbach, T. Cullen, C. Larson, Wirch, S. Coggs, Taylor and Vinehout

  11. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    LRB correction

  12. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance

  13. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  14. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Senate Organization and rereferred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, pursuant to Senate Rule 46 (2)(c)

  15. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1