Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
regulation of ferrous metallic mining and related activities, procedures for obtaining approvals from the Department of Natural Resources for the construction of utility facilities, making an appropriation, and providing penalties.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Overview
This bill makes changes in the laws relating to the regulation of iron mining and
procedures for utility facility approvals.
Procedures for utility facility approvals
Under current law, with certain exceptions, a person may not begin the
construction of certain utility facilities before the Public Service Commission (PSC)
has issued to the person either a certificate of public convenience and necessity
(CPCN) or a certificate authorizing the person to transact public utility business
(PSC certificate). Current law also provides that a utility facility that is required to
obtain a PSC certificate and that is required to obtain one or more permits from the
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), such as a permit allowing the placement
of a structure in navigable waters, must use a procedure that requires the utility
facility to submit only one application to DNR for all of the required DNR permits
(combined permit procedure) rather than submitting separate applications to DNR
for each permit. Current law also specifies that the applicant under the combined
permit procedure must submit the combined application for permits to DNR at the
same time that the applicant files an application for a PSC certificate.
This bill makes the combined permit procedure optional and allows a utility
facility to submit separate applications to DNR for each required permit. Under the
bill, if the utility facility does not use the combined permit procedure, it is not
required to file a DNR permit application at the same time that it files an application
for a PSC certificate.
Current law requires a person proposing to construct a large electric generating
facility or high-voltage transmission line (facility) to provide DNR with an
engineering plan or project plan for the facility at least 60 days before filing an
application with PSC for a CPCN. Within 30 days thereafter, DNR must provide the
person with a listing of each DNR approval that appears to be required for the
construction or operation of the facility. Current law requires the person to file the
application for these approvals within 20 days after receiving the listing from DNR.
This bill eliminates this 20-day deadline and also specifies that the person must only
apply for those approvals identified in the listing that are applicable.
Iron mining, generally
Under current law, DNR regulates mining for metallic minerals. The laws
under which DNR regulates metallic mining apply to mining for ferrous minerals
(iron) and mining for nonferrous minerals, such as copper or zinc.
This bill creates new statutes for regulating iron mining and modifies the
current laws regulating metallic mining so that they cover only mining for
nonferrous minerals.
Under current law, a person who proposes to mine for metallic minerals must
obtain a mining permit and any other permit, license, certification, or other
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Darling (R) , Galloway (R) , Grothman (R) , Kedzie (R) , Lasee (R) , Lazich (R) , Leibham (R) , S. Fitzgerald (R) , Vukmir (R) , Wanggaard (R) , Zipperer (R)
59 cosponsors
A. Ott (R) , August (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Craig (R) , Endsley (R) , Farrow (R) , Honadel (R) , J. Fitzgerald (R) , J. Ott (R) , Jacque (R) , Kapenga (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kestell (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Klenke (R) , Knilans (R) , Knodl (R) , Knudson (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Kramer (R) , Krug (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Litjens (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Marklein (R) , Meyer (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Nass (R) , Nerison (R) , Nygren (R) , Petersen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Petryk (R) , Pridemore (R) , Ripp (R) , Rivard (R) , Severson (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Steineke (R) , Stone (R) , Strachota (R) , Stroebel (R) , Suder (R) , T. Larson (R) , Tauchen (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tiffany (R) , Tranel (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Weininger (R) , Williams (R) , Wynn (R)
Votes
Senate: Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance
Passed 16–0 Mar 6, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 16, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Galloway, Vukmir, Zipperer, Wanggaard, Darling, S. Fitzgerald, Lasee, Lazich, Leibham, Kedzie and Grothman;Cosponsored by Representatives J. Fitzgerald, Suder, Williams, Tiffany, Honadel, August, Ballweg, Bernier, Bies, Brooks, Craig, Endsley, Farrow, Jacque, Kapenga, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kestell, Kleefisch, Klenke, Knilans, Knodl, Knudson, Kooyenga, Kramer, Krug, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Loudenbeck, Marklein, Meyer, Mursau, Murtha, Nass, Nerison, Nygren, A. Ott, J. Ott, Petersen, Petrowski, Petryk, Pridemore, Ripp, Rivard, Severson, Spanbauer, Steineke, Stone, Strachota, Stroebel, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Van Roy, Vos, Weininger and Wynn
- Feb 16, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance
- Feb 17, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 24, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 24, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 1, 2012 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 3 offered by Senators Jauch, Schultz, King, Holperin, Hansen, Erpenbach, T. Cullen, C. Larson, Wirch, S. Coggs, Taylor and Vinehout
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0 by joint committee on Finance
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from committee on Senate Organization and rereferred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, pursuant to Senate Rule 46 (2)(c)
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1