Senate Bill 489
Separation of the licensing requirements for barbering and cosmetology, creation of the barbering examining board, and providing a penalty
Topics: Barber, Cosmetology, Reorganization of state government, Safety and Professional Services, Department of
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 20, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 13, 2012
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 15, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 190
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 5, 2012: “Published 4-16-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Barbering and cosmetology licensing Under current law, the Barbering and Cosmetology Examining Board (board) regulates the practices in this state of barbers and cosmetologists, aesthetists, manicurists, electrologists, managers of establishments where any of those practices are performed, and the establishments themselves. The board issues one license that covers the practice of barbers and cosmetologists (barbering and cosmetology license). The board also issues one manager license, which requires as a prerequisite that the person holds a barbering and cosmetology license, and one license for barbering and cosmetology establishment. The board issues separate licenses for aesthetists, manicurists, and electrologists, defined below.
This bill establishes licensure requirements related to barbering that are independent of the requirements related to cosmetology renames the board the Cosmetology Examining Board, and creates the Barbering Examining Board for the regulation of barbering in this state. Under the bill, the Cosmetology Examining Board continues to regulate the practice of cosmetologists, aesthetists, manicurists, and electrologists.
Read the full summary Show less
The members of the Barbering Examining Board are as follows:
1. Four members who are licensed barbers.
2. Two members who are public members.
3. One member who is a representative of a school of barbering.
The governor appoints the members of the Barbering Examining Board to serve staggered four-year terms.
Current law defines barbering and cosmetology together as a practice that may include one or more of the following services, if performed for compensation:
1. Arranging, styling, dressing, shampooing, cleansing, curling, dyeing, tinting, coloring, bleaching, waving, cutting, shaving, trimming, relaxing, singeing, or performing similar work upon the hair or beard of a person.
2. Aesthetics, which includes beautifying or cleansing or applying cosmetics, oils, lotions, clay, creams, antiseptics, powders, or tonics to or massaging, stimulating, wrapping, exercising, or performing similar work upon the skin of a person.
3. Manicuring, which is cleansing, cutting, shaping, beautifying, or massaging limited to the hands, feet, or nails of a person.
4. Removing a person's hair by means other than by use of an electric needle.
The removal of hair from the human body by use of an electric needle is electrology.
Under current law, a person who holds a barbering and cosmetology license, or a licensed manager, may practice aesthetics and manicuring without being separately licensed in those areas. The practice of electrology requires licensure as an electrologist. Also under current law, a licensed manager may manage any establishment where barbering and cosmetology, aesthetics, manicuring, or electrology takes place.
Similarly, under current law, a person who holds a barbering and cosmetology license, or a licensed manager, may use titles that are associated with the practice of barbering and cosmetology or may use titles that are associated with the practice of a manicurist or aesthetist, but that person may not use titles associated with the practice of an electrologist unless the person is also licensed as an electrologist.
Under the bill, a person who is licensed by the Barbering Examining Board solely as a barber or barbering manager may practice only barbering or manage only a barbering establishment licensed by the Barbering Examining Board, and such a person may use titles associated only with barbering. The bill defines barbering as arranging, styling, dressing, shampooing, cleansing, curling, dyeing, tinting, coloring, bleaching, waving, cutting, shaving, trimming, relaxing, singeing, or performing similar work upon the hair of the head, neck, or face of a person.
The bill defines cosmetology as performing one or more of the following:
barbering, aesthetics, manicuring, or removing a person's hair by means other than by use of an electric needle. Under the bill, a person who is licensed by the Cosmetology Examining Board as a cosmetologist or cosmetology manager may practice barbering, aesthetics, or manicuring but not electrology unless the person also holds a license as an electrologist. A licensed cosmetology manager may manage any establishment where barbering, cosmetology, aesthetics, manicuring, or electrology is performed.
Similarly, under the bill, a licensed cosmetologist or cosmetology manager may use titles associated with barbering, cosmetology, aesthetics, or manicuring, but that person may not use titles associated with practice as an electrologist unless the person also holds a license as an electrologist.
Under current law, a person must meet all of the education, examination, and practice requirements for initial licensure as a barber and cosmetologist or manager, whether or not that person intends to provide solely services that are traditionally associated with barbering, such as shaving and cutting hair or intends to manage an establishment where only those kinds of services are performed. Also under current law, the board may establish continuing education requirements for barbers and cosmetologists, aesthetists, manicurists, electrologists, and managers as a part of the disciplinary process to ensure competency, or if necessary to preserve the public health, safety, or welfare.
Under the bill, the Barbering Examining Board establishes initial licensure requirements for barbers and barbering managers that are independent of those for cosmetologists. The bill eliminates any continuing education requirements for barbers.
Also under the bill, the Barbering Examining Board regulates and licenses establishments where only barbering may take place. The Cosmetology Examining Board regulates and licenses establishments where the practices of cosmetology, aesthetics, manicuring, or electrology may take place, in addition to barbering.
Inactive licenses Under current law, a person who holds a barbering and cosmetology license, or who holds a license as an aesthetist, manicurist, electrologist, or manager, must meet certain renewal requirements, such as the payment of a renewal fee, and may have to meet continuing education requirements, if that person wishes to maintain that license.
Under the bill, any person to whom the Cosmetology Examining Board or the Barbering Examining Board has issued a license may apply to the appropriate board to have that license classified as inactive. The Cosmetology Examining Board or the Barbering Examining Board may classify a license as inactive if the licensed person is otherwise in good standing with the appropriate board and intends to refrain from practice under the license. A person who holds an inactive license is not required to meet continuing education requirements for the license and may pay one-half the usual renewal fee for the license. A person who holds an inactive license may not practice under that license unless the person's active status is returned by the appropriate board or unless the work performed is minimal, as determined by the appropriate board.
Barbering and cosmetology schools and instructors Under current law, the Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS) directly licenses barbering and cosmetology schools and specialty schools. A specialty school is one that concentrates in aesthetics, manicuring, or electrology.
DSPS issues one license for barbering and cosmetology schools. A licensed barbering and cosmetology school may offer courses of instruction in barbering and cosmetology, aesthetics, manicuring, and electrology.
Under current law, DSPS also certifies instructors in barbering and cosmetology, aesthetics, manicuring, and electrology. DSPS issues one certification for barbering and cosmetology instructors, and a person who is certified as a barbering and cosmetology instructor may teach in a barbering and cosmetology school or in a specialty school.
The bill establishes licensure requirements for barbering schools that are independent of the requirements for cosmetology schools. Under the bill, a licensed barbering school may offer courses of instruction only in barbering, while a licensed cosmetology school may offer courses of instruction in cosmetology, as well as barbering, aesthetics, manicuring, and electrology if certain requirements relating to instruction in each of those practices are met.
Similarly, the bill establishes certification requirements for barbering instructors that are independent of the certification requirements for cosmetology instructors. Under the bill, a certified barbering instructor may provide instruction in barbering. A certified cosmetology instructor may provide instruction in barbering, cosmetology, aesthetics, and manicuring.
Who's behind it
4 senators are its . 3 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 11 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (7)
- David Craig · Republican, Senate
- Mark Honadel · Republican, Assembly
- Dale Kooyenga · Republican, Senate
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Michelle Litjens · Republican, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues vote on an amendment
Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 2, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 4, Noes 1 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 12, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 29 to 4 · Mar 13, 2012
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (29)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dale Schultz (R, 17)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Glenn Grothman (R, 20)
- Jessica King (D, 18)
- Jim Holperin (D, 12)
- Joe Leibham (R, 9)
- Julie M. Lassa (D, 24)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Mary Lazich (R, 28)
- Michael Ellis (R, 19)
- Neal Kedzie (R, 11)
- Pam Galloway (R, 29)
- Rich Zipperer (R, 33)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Robert Jauch (D, 25)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Spencer Coggs (D, 6)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Timothy Cullen (D, 15)
No (4)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 29, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 5, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 3, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 190.
-
Mar 30, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 15, 2012
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 13, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Assembly received it.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Senate passed it, 29 to 4.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Senate adopted it.
-
Mar 12, 2012
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 12, 2012
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Mar 9, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 2, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.
-
Feb 29, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 22, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues,.
-
Feb 20, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs.
-
Feb 20, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Grothman, Harsdorf, Schultz and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Kooyenga, Litjens, Young, Honadel, Spanbauer, Krug and Craig
- Feb 20, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from committee on Labor, Public Safety, and Urban Affairs and rereferred to committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, pursuant to Senate Rule 46 (2)(c)
- Feb 29, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 4, Noes 1 by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 9, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senate substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 29, Noes 4
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 9:22 A.M. on 3-14-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 24
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 16, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-23-2012
- Mar 30, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-30-2012
- Apr 3, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 190
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-16-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote