Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Senate Bill 490

Maintenance and removal of vegetation obstructing the view of outdoor advertising signs along highways under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation

Topics: Billboard, Building, Plants, Road, Transportation, Department of: Roads

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 20, 2012

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 26, 2012: “Fiscal estimate received”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) is responsible for maintenance of the highway right-of-way on highways that, for maintenance purposes, are under its jurisdiction, which are generally state trunk highways (including interstate highways) but do not include connecting highways. DOT must provide for the care and protection of trees and other roadside vegetation. DOT must also cut, trim, or remove, or allow others to cut, trim, or remove, trees and other vegetation in order to provide safety to highway users. Current law generally prohibits a person from cutting, trimming, removing, or planting a tree or other vegetation within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway without DOT's consent.

The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, which includes state trunk highways and connecting highways, and current state law incorporates these requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions, the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising signs (signs) within 660 feet of, or beyond 660 feet but visible (and erected for the purpose of being visible) from, the main-traveled way of an interstate or federal-aid primary highway. Exceptions to this prohibition include, with some restrictions, signs advertising activities conducted on the property on which the signs are located; signs located beyond 660 feet of the highway in urban areas; and signs located within 660 feet of the highway in certain business, industrial, or commercial areas.

Read the full summary

Under current law, DOT administers a permit system for the maintenance and removal by sign owners of vegetation obstructing the view of signs along state trunk highways, including interstate highways. DOT may issue permits to sign owners for the trimming, removal, or relocation of vegetation in the highway right-of-way if, within various specified distances along the highway, the vegetation obstructs motorists' view of the face of a sign. A permit authorizes the sign owner, or a third-party contractor employed by the sign owner, to trim, remove, or relocate obstructing vegetation to the extent necessary to eliminate the obstruction and restore an unobstructed view of the sign for the applicable specified distance along the highway. A permit must specify the vegetation or the portion of the highway right-of-way to which the permit applies. Each permit must require a sign owner that removes planted vegetation to either relocate the planted vegetation or reimburse DOT for the value of the planted vegetation. DOT must present to the sign owner DOT's calculation of the value of the planted vegetation, and the sign owner may elect to relocate the planted vegetation or to reimburse DOT in the amount calculated by DOT.

This bill makes various changes to DOT's permit system for maintenance and removal of vegetation obstructing signs, including the following:

1. The bill replaces various sign viewing standards with a single standard: that a sign owner is eligible for a permit to trim or remove vegetation if, for a distance of 500 continuous feet within the 1,000 feet distance motorists travel immediately before reaching the sign, the vegetation obstructs the view of any portion of the face of the sign. The bill also eliminates an exception that allowed DOT to issue a permit for a noncontinuous 500 feet viewing distance.

2. The bill specifies that, with limited exceptions, DOT must issue permits to eligible applicants. Also under the bill, DOT permits authorize the trimming or removal, but not the relocation, of obstructing vegetation. The bill also requires all trimming to be performed in compliance with applicable standards of the American National Standards Institute.

3. The bill eliminates the requirement that a permittee that removes planted vegetation must either relocate the planted vegetation or reimburse DOT for the value of the planted vegetation. The bill replaces this requirement with the requirement that a permittee that removes vegetation with a diameter of four inches or more must plant replacement vegetation to compensate for the vegetation removed. DOT must determine where the replacement vegetation is to be planted, but it must be planted in the highway right-of-way within ten miles of the location where the vegetation was removed. The bill specifies that a permittee that removes vegetation must also remove the vegetation's stump and must dispose of all vegetation removed.

4. Under the bill, DOT's permit system for the maintenance and removal of vegetation obstructing the view of a sign also applies to any sign that is attached to a building or similar structure, that is within 100 feet of the highway right-of-way, and that advertises activities conducted on the property.

5. The bill eliminates a provision of current law that a permit may not authorize the trimming, removal, or relocation of vegetation in existence prior to the erection of the sign obstructed by the vegetation. The bill replaces this provision with a provision that DOT may not issue a permit to trim or remove vegetation obstructing the view of a sign that is less than five years old (calculated from when DOT first collected the sign's permit fee), except a sign that is attached to a building or similar structure, that is within 100 feet of the highway right-of-way, and that advertises activities conducted on the property.

6. The bill eliminates a provision of current law allowing DOT to require as a condition or restriction under a permit that the work authorized under the permit meet standards established by DOT. Instead, under the bill, DOT may impose any condition or restriction on a permit that DOT customarily imposes in connection with work performed on highway rights-of-way. The bill retains current law that DOT has authority to supervise and determine how the work authorized under a permit is carried out.

7. Under the bill, DOT may deny an application for a permit for a sign for which DOT has issued a removal order and the removal order was received by the sign owner prior to DOT's receipt of the application. DOT may also impose conditions or restrictions on a permit under certain circumstances, including that the application seeks authorization for the trimming or removal of vegetation at an archaeological site. Under the bill, all trimming and removal of vegetation, as well as all planting of replacement vegetation, must be conducted within the hours of the day and days of the week specified by DOT in the permit.

8. The bill eliminates a requirement under current law that, under certain conditions, a sign owner applying for a permit must, at the time of the application, provide written notice of the application to any adjacent property owner and to the applicable municipality.

9. The bill eliminates a provision of current law requiring DOT, within 30 days of receiving an application for a permit, to determine whether the application is complete and to return it to the applicant if incomplete.

10. The bill expands the definition of "vegetation," for purposes of the bill, to include grass. The bill also eliminates the distinction between various other types of vegetation, including "natural vegetation," "planted vegetation," and "specimen trees."

Who's behind it

6 senators are its ⁠. All 6 are Republicans.

18 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (18)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 12, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 26, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  2. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  3. Mar 12, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  4. Mar 8, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Feb 20, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.

  6. Feb 20, 2012

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Grothman, Darling, Lasee, Moulton, Olsen and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Honadel, Bies, Brooks, Kestell, LeMahieu, Mursau, Nerison, Nygren, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Stone, Strachota, Tiffany, Van Roy, Vruwink, Weininger, Wynn and E. Coggs

  2. Feb 20, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  3. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  6. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  8. Mar 26, 2012 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote