Senate Bill 496
Brucellosis testing of milk, cream, and cattle and restrictions on moving or sale of American bison and other animal species
Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Animal, Animal: Disease, Dairy product: Regulation, Livestock and meat
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 13, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 21, 2012
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 6, 2012
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 13, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 281
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 16, 2012: “Published 4-26-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law requires the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (department) to conduct testing of milk and cream at dairy plants at regular intervals in order to identify and limit incidents of bovine brucellosis. If milk or cream tests positive for brucellosis, certain cattle and American bison must be subjected to blood tests for brucellosis. This testing requirement derives, in part, from United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulations; the USDA recently modified its regulations to eliminate the frequency of brucellosis testing in this state and other states in which no brucellosis has been identified for five or more years. This bill repeals the bovine brucellosis milk and cream and blood testing requirements.
Current law also prohibits, with certain exceptions, a person from moving or selling an American bison, or animal of another species identified by the department by rule, born on or after June 1, 1984, unless it is accompanied by a report of a complete negative brucellosis test conducted within 30 days prior to movement. This bill eliminates this prohibition.
Who's behind it
Dale Schultz, a Republican, is its .
7 more lawmakers .
See all 8 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (7)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Lee Nerison · Republican, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 0 · Feb 24, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 16, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 13, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 281.
-
Apr 5, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Mar 6, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 6, 2012
The Assembly received it.
-
Mar 6, 2012
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Mar 6, 2012
The Senate passed it.
-
Mar 2, 2012
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 24, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Feb 23, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 22, 2012
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Feb 21, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education.
-
Feb 21, 2012
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Nerison, A. Ott, Vruwink, Tranel and Spanbauer
- Feb 21, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Senator Vinehout added as a coauthor
- Feb 23, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 23, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 24, 2012 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Forestry, and Higher Education, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 24, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 2, 2012 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 5, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a coauthor
- Mar 6, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:39 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 21, 2012 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 3-21-2012
- Apr 5, 2012 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012
- Apr 13, 2012 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-12-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 281
- Apr 16, 2012 · Senate
Published 4-26-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote